Abstract
The use of phantoms for medical imaging is of increasing importance, especially concerning hybrid imaging technologies. The purpose of this study was to find new materials suitable for hybrid phantoms which can be used in magnet resonance imaging, CT and nuclear medicine. Suitable phantom materials have to meet the requirements: tissue-equivalent relaxation and absorption/scattering coefficients, material stability/strength to reproduce tissue structures, no bacterial infestation of the material, cost-effective use. The material samples in this study were based on the basic components: carrageenan (3%, m/m), agarose (0.8–1.0%, m/m), GdCl3 (30–100 µmol/kg), NaNO3 (antiseptic agent, <0.1%, m/m) and H2O. Additional modifiers were added: Ba(NO3)2, SiO2, CuSO4, MgCl2. These modifiers influence the relaxation times and abortion characteristics. For tissue-equivalency, T1/T2-times and Hounsfield Units (HU) of material samples were compared to various human tissues after performing the following experiments: MR-relaxometry was measured using a 1.5T MRI scanner. HU were acquired at 80 kV/110 kV/130 kV using a CT scanner; for nuclear medicine, material samples (10 MBq, TC-99 m) were examined in a water-phantom utilizing a SPECT-system. Tissue structures, like soft-tissue, brain (gray/white matter), kidney and liver can be simulated with high accuracy in their relaxation times and HU-values using (Ba(NO3)2 as an additional modifier. This modifier meets all requirements and covers T1/T2-times of 700–1400 ms/50–80 ms and HU-values of 12–740 HU. Functional relationships were investigated by describing the T1/T2-times in dependency of the T1/T2-modifiers. Other modifiers did not meet all tissue-equivalent characteristics. Our gel-based approach can also be used in nuclear medicine to generate active tissue structures, e.g. hot nodules with TC-99 m.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
R.-D. Vre, R. Grimee, F. Parmentier, J. Binet: The use of agar gel as a basic reference material for calibrating relaxation times and imaging parameters, Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 2, 176–179 (1985).
M. Bucciolini, L. Ciraolo, B. Lehmann: Simulation of biologic tissues by using agar gels at magnetic resonance imaging, Acta Radiologica 30, 667–669 (1989).
M. D. Mitchell, H. L. Kundel, L. Axel, P. M. Joseph: Agarose as a tissue equivalent phantom material for nmr imaging, Magnetic Resonance Imaging 4, 263–266 (1986).
J. O. Christoffersson, L. Olsson, S. Sjoeberg: Nickel-doped agarose gel phantoms in mr imaging, Acta radiologica 32, 426–431 (1991).
F. Howe: Relaxation times in paramagnetically doped agarose gels as a function of temperature and ion concentration, Magnetic resonance imaging 6, 263–270 (1988).
K. A. Kraft, P. P. Fatouros, G. D. Clarke, P. R. S. Kishore: An mri phantom material for quantitative relaxometry, Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 5, 555–562 (1987).
W. Derbyshire, I. D. Duff: N.m.r. of agarose gels, Faraday Discuss. Chem. Soc. 57, 243–254 (1974).
I. Duff, W. Derbyshire: Nmr of frozen agarose gels, Journal of Magnetic Resonance (1969) 17, 89–94 (1975).
I. Mano, H. Goshima, M. Nambu, M. Iio: New polyvinyl alcohol gel material for mri phantoms, Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 3, 921–926 (1986).
K. C. Chu, B. K. Rutt: Polyvinyl alcohol cryogel: an ideal phantom material for mr studies of arterial flow and elasticity, Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 37, 314–319 (1997).
M. W. Groch, J. A. Urbon, W. D. Erwin, S. Al-Doohan: An mri tissue equivalent lesion phantom using a novel polysaccharide material, Magnetic Resonance Imaging 9, 417–421 (1991).
G. P. Mazzara, R. W. Briggs, Z. Wu, B. G. Steinbach: Use of a modified polysaccharide gel in developing a realistic breast phantom for mri, Magnetic resonance imaging 14, 639–648 (1996).
E. L. Madsen, G. D. Fullerton: Second annual meeting of the society for magnetic resonance imaging prospective tissue-mimicking materials for use in nmr imaging phantoms, Magnetic Resonance Imaging 1, 135–141 (1982).
J. Blechinger, E. Madsen, G. Frank: Tissue-mimicking gelatin–agar gels for use in magnetic resonance imaging phantoms, Medical physics 15, 629–636 (1988).
F. De Luca, B. Maraviglia, A. Mercurio: Biological tissue simulation and standard testing material for mri, Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 4, 189–192 (1987).
S. Ohno, H. Kato, H., T. Harimoto, Y. Ikemoto, K. Yoshitomi, S. Kadohisa, M. Kuroda, S. Kanazawa: Production of a human-tissue-equivalent MRI phantom: optimization of material heating, Magnetic Resonance in Medical Sciences 7, 131–140 (2008).
A. Hellerbach, V. Schuster, A. Jansen, J. Sommer: Mri phantoms? Are there alternatives to agar?, PLoS ONE 8, 1–8 (2013).
K. Yoshimura, H. Kato, M. Kuroda, A. Yoshida, K. Hanamoto, A. Tanaka, M. Tsunoda, S. Kanazawa, K. Shibuya, S. Kawasaki, Y. Hiraki: Development of a tissue-equivalent MRI phantom using carrageenan gel, Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 50, 1011–1017 (2003).
H. Krieger: Strahlungsmessung und Dosimetrie. 2nd edn, Springer Spektrum (2013).
S. J. Graham, G. J. Stanisz, A. Kecojevic, M. J. Bronskill, R. M. Henkelman: Analysis of changes in MR properties of tissues after heat treatment. Magn. Reson. Med. 42: 1061–1071 (1999).
A. Cieszanowski, W. Szeszkowski, M. Golebiowski, D. K. Bielecki, M. Grodzicki, B. Pruszynski. Eur Radiol 12, 2273 (2012).
T. Aherne, D. Tscholakoff, W. Finkbeiner, U. Sechtem, N. Derugin, E. Yee, C. B. Higgins: Magnetic resonance imaging of cardiac transplants: the evaluation of rejection of cardiac allografts with and without immunosuppression. Circulation. 74, 145–156 (1986).
G. J. Stanisz, E. E. Odrobina, J. Pun, M. Escaravage, S. J. Graham, M. J. Bronskill, R. M. Henkelman: T1, T2 relaxation and magnetization transfer in tissue at 3T. Magn. Reson. Med., 54: 507–512 (2005).
S. C. Deoni, B. K. Rutt, T. M. Peters: Rapid combined t1 and t2 mapping using gradient recalled acquisition in the steady state, Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 49, 515–526 (2003).
G. J. Stanisz, E. E. Odrobina, J. Pun, M. Escaravage, S. J. Graham, M. J. Bronskill, R. M. Henkelman: T1, T2 relaxation and magnetization transfer in tissue at 3T, Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 54, 507–512 (2005).
C. M. J. de Bazelaire, G. D. Duhamel, N. M. Rofsky, D. C. Alsop: Mr imaging relaxation times of abdominal and pelvic tissues measured in vivo at 3.0 T: Preliminary results, Radiology 230, 652–659 (2004).
M. A. Goldberg, P. F. Hahn, S. Saini, M. Cohen, P. Reimer, T. Brady, P. Mueller: Value of t1 and t2 relaxation times from echoplanar mr imaging in the characterization of focal hepatic lesions., AJR. American journal of roentgenology 160, 1011–1017 (1993).
M. Barth, E. Moser: Proton nmr relaxation times of human blood samples at 1.5 t and implications for functional mri, Cellular and molecular biology 43, 783–791 (1997).
Acknowledgements
We gratefully thank the institute for radiology and nuclear medicine at the Paracelsus Private Medical University for providing their MR scanner for relaxometry measurements.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Ethics declarations
No humans or animals are involved in this study. The study was performed in compliance with ethical standards.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Electronic Supplementary Material
Electronic Supplementary Material
Suppl. 1: Figure of the material sample for MRI and CT measurements and spherical material sample for measurements in nuclear medicine.
University-Server URL:
https://www.oth-aw.de/files/oth-aw/Personen/Stich/Suppl1_compressed.tif
Suppl. 2: Figure of the measured and fitted SIR and SSE signals for the basic component mixture with different modifiers.
University-Server URL:
https://www.oth-aw.de/files/oth-aw/Personen/Stich/Suppl2_compressed.tiff
Suppl. 3: Surface and contour plots of the regression polynomials PT1(G, B) for the T1 relaxation and PT2(G, B) for the T2 relaxation.
University-Server URL:
https://www.oth-aw.de/files/oth-aw/Personen/Stich/Suppl3_compressed.tiff
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Stich, M. et al. (2019). Material Analysis for a New Kind of Hybrid Phantoms Utilized in Multimodal Imaging. In: Lhotska, L., Sukupova, L., Lacković, I., Ibbott, G.S. (eds) World Congress on Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering 2018. IFMBE Proceedings, vol 68/1. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-9035-6_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-9035-6_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-9034-9
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-9035-6
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)