Skip to main content

Profit Opportunity, Strategic Innovation, and Management Accounting

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

This chapter reexamines the concept of profit in management accounting from the viewpoints of opportunity, profit opportunity, and strategic (feed-forward) innovation. The information required today for strategic management and performance evaluation has become distinct from accounting profit information required for traditional management, given the current transitory and uncertain business environment. However, management accounting cannot exist without profit. Therefore, the chapter seeks to examine the source of profit and clarify the profit opportunity–based aspects of contemporary management accounting through the analysis of opportunity, profit opportunity, and strategic innovations. For this purpose, the chapter first addresses the relationship between opportunity and profit opportunity. Secondly, in association with management accounting, it seeks to understand current innovations intended to enhance profit opportunity. Thirdly, effects of innovations and profit opportunity on target costing in Japan are discussed. Lastly, this chapter develops profit opportunity–based variance analysis that is useful in feed-forward planning and feedback control processes. Increased use of strategic innovation management is found to yield more useful variance analysis and strengthen the strategic feature of management accounting, which can contribute to future innovation in management and help objectively recognize and reduce opportunity costs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    This book uses the term ‘feed-forward innovation’ more roughly than as used in cybernetic science. In this context, the word means proactive and preventive information and management /production system in which global information, knowledge, resources, competence, and technologies are used for self-reliance (internal innovation), agile supply chain management (external innovation), and global innovation. Enterprises have invested large amounts of money and time for establishing this feed-forward innovation. Thus, it would be better to say ‘strategic innovation’ in this chapter, because it is strategic and we are not familiar with ‘feed-forward innovation’. For example, a leading mobile phone manufacturer, Nokia, adopted integrated project management, which consists of collaborative demand planning with customers, site-based ordering by progress, professional cost management, and performance metrics with an integrated platform. The supply chain is flexibly decentralized according to changing markets on the basis of concentrated demand planning and site-based ordering, whereas parts and components are standardized and modularized for finished products in response to changes in demand in markets. Its goal is “to provide customers with more speed, efficient and cost effective deliveries by better orchestrating the end-to-end supply chain” (Collin and Lorenzin 2006). In the case of Zara, each of the more than 300 small contractors specializes in one particular part of the production process or one particular garment type. They work exclusively for Zara’s parent company, Inditex SA. In return, they receive the necessary technological, financial, and logistical support required to meet the stringent time and quality targets (Christopher 2000).

Bibliography

  • Atkinson, A. A., Banker, R. D., Kaplan, R. S., & Yong, S. M. (2001). Management Accounting. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belkoui, A. (1983). Cost Accounting: A Multidimensional Emphasis. Chicago: The Dryden Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birkinshaw, J., Bouquet, C., & Barsoux, J-L. (2011, Winter). The 5 Myths of Innovation. MIT Sloan Management Review, 1–8. Sloan-select Collection.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boudreau, K. J.. & Lakhani, K. R. (2009, Summer). How to Manage outside Innovation, MIT Sloan Management Review, 50–57. Sloan-Select Collection, Winter 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chesbrough, H. W. (2003, Spring). The Era of Open Innovation. MIT Sloan Management Review, 35–41. Sloan-select Collection.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chesbrough, H. W. (2007, Winter). Why Companies Should Have Open Business Models, MIT Sloan Management Review, 68–74. Sloan-select Collection.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christopher, M. (2000). The Agile Supply Chain: Competing in Volatile Markets. Industrial Marketing Management, 29, 37–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christopher, M., & Towill, D. (2001). An Integrated Model for the Design of Agile Supply Chains. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 31(4), 235–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collin, J., & Lorenzin, D. (2006). Plan for Supply Chain Agility at Nokia: Lessons from the Mobile Infrastructure Industry. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 36(6), 418–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, J. (2009). How the Mighty Fall and Why Some Companies Never Give in. New York: HarperCollins Publishers Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, R., & Slagmulder, R. (1999). Develop Profitable New Products with Target Costing. MIT Sloan Management Review, 40(Summer), 23–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, R., & Slagmulder, R. (2004). Achieving Full-Cycle Cost Management. MIT Sloan Management Review, 46(Fall), 45–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Demski, J. S. (1967, October). An Accounting System Structures on a Linear Programming Model. Accounting Review, 42(4), 701–712.

    Google Scholar 

  • Demski, J. S. (1968, October). Some Observations on Demski’s Ex Post Accounting System: A Reply. The Accounting Review, 43(4), 672–674.

    Google Scholar 

  • Demski, J. S. (1969, October). Decision-Performance Control. Accounting Review, 44(4), 669–713.

    Google Scholar 

  • Falta, M., Gallagher, L., & Willett, R. (2006). Modeling ‘Hard-To-Measure’ Costs in Environment Management Accounting. Asia-Pacific Management Accounting Journal, 1(1), 127–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Govindarajan, V., & Trimble, C. (2004, Winter). Strategic Innovation and the Science of Learning, MIT Sloan Management Review, 19–27. Sloan-select Collection.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grégoire, D. A., Barr, P. S., & Shepherd, D. A. (2010, March–April). Cognitive Processes of Opportunity Recognition: The Role of Structural Alignment. Organization Science, 21(2), 413–431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gruber, M. M., Ian, C., & Thompson, J. D. (2008, September). Look before You Leap: Market Opportunity Identification in Emerging Technology Firms. Management Science, 54(9), 1652–1665.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haynie, M. J., Shepherd, D. A., & McMullen, J. S. (2009, May). An Opportunity for Me? The Role of Resources in Opportunity Evaluation Decision. Journal of Management Studies, 46(3), 337–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hopkins, M. S. (2010, Spring). The Four Ways IT Is Revolutionizing Innovation (Interview), MIT Sloan Management Review, 75–80. Sloan-select Collection.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingrassia, P. (2011). Crash Course: The American Automobile Industry’s Road to Bankruptcy and Bailout—And Beyond. New York: Random House Trade Publishing Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ishikawa, A., & Smith, C. H. (1972). A Feed Forward Control System for Organizational Planning and Control. ABACUS, 8(2), 163–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1996). The Balanced Scorecard: Translating Strategy into Action. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kawada, M. (2009). From Profit to Profit Potential: Redesign the Performance Indicator to Support Toyota Production System, Contemporary Issues of Management and Accounting in the World Financial Crisis. Proceedings of the 5th Asia-Pacific Management Forum in Japan, the Asia-Pacific Management Accounting Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kornish, L. J., & Ulrich, K. T. (2011, January). Opportunity Spaces in Innovation: Empirical Analysis of Large Samples of Ideas. Management Science, 57(1), 107–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumarasinghe, S., & Willett, R. (2010). What Can Management Accounting Practitioners and Academics to Improve Risk Measurement and Foreworn Impending Financial Crises? Asia-Pacific Management Accounting Journal, 5(2), 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lim, M. (2011). Full Cost Accounting in Solid Waste Management: The Gap in the Literature on Newly Industrialized Countries. Journal of Applied Management Accounting Research, 9(1), 21–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • March, J. G. (1991, February). Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning. Organizational Science, 2(1), 71–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mcmillan, C. J. (1984). Cost Information and Competitive Strategy: Lessons from Japan. In L. C. Rosen (Ed.), Topics in Managerial Accounting (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill Ryerson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, M. (1992). Feed Forward Control for Competitive Advantage: The Japanese Approach. Journal of General Management, 17(Summer), 41–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morris, D. (2005). A New Tool for Strategy Analysis: The Opportunity Model. Journal of Business Strategy, 25(3), 50–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nagaike, K. (2010, October). Rising Global Horizontal Integration Business Network Systems in Electronics Industry and Reorganization Strategies of Japanese Electronics Companies. Journal of Strategic Management Studies, 2(1), 29–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakajima, H. (2004). Treatment of Life Cycle Costs in Target Costing; A Review of Past Research and Examination of Unsettled Subjects. Study of Business Management, 21, 119–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakajima, H. (2011). Life Cycle Costing: Development in UK. Sosei Publisher.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naylor, B. J., Naim, M. M., & Berry, D. (1999). Legality: Integrating the Lean and Agile Manufacturing Paradigms in the Total Supply Chain. International Journal of Production Economics, 62, 107–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nikkei (Nihon Economic Newspaper) (2011a, September 13). Japanese and Korean Cooperation for Development of Smartphone Semiconductors. Nikkei (Nihon Economic Newspaper).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nikkei (2011b, September 13). Komats Searches for its Course (1). Nikkei.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nikkei (2011c, December 12). Why is Ink-jet Expensive? Nikkei.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nishimura, A. (1996). New Development of Japanese Management Accounting: From Cost Design to Strategic Cost Design. Journal of Political Economy (Kyushu University), 62(1–6), 241–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nishimura, A. (2003). Management Accounting in Asia: feed forward and Asian perspectives. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nishimura, A. (2005). Strategic Management and Contemporary Management Accounting. In A. Nishimura & R. Willett (Eds.), Management Accounting in Asia (pp. 1–8). Singapore: Thomson Learning (a Division of Thomson Asia Pte Ltd).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nishimura, A. (2007). Conceptual Analysis of Value-based Management and Accounting: with Reference to Japanese Practices. Asian-Pacific Management Accounting Journal, 2(1), 71–87. Public Knowledge Project (Open Journal System). http://arionline.uitm.edu.my/ojs/index.php/APMAJ/issue/view/54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nishimura, A. (2011). Uncertainty and Management Accounting: Opportunity, Profit Opportunity and Profit. Asia-Pacific Management Accounting Journal, 6(1), 81–101. Public Knowledge Project (Open Journal System). http://arionline.uitm.edu.my/ojs/index.php/APMAJ/issue/view/13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orita, Y. (2012a). The Whole Company’s Improvement Process of Cost Management, Reexamination of Management Accounting for Manufacturing, Report in the Third Forum (December 8, Tokyo), Japanese Association of Management Accounting.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orita, Y. (2012b). The Whole Company’s Improvement Process of Cost Management: Reexamination of Management Accounting for Manufacturing (Case Study of Fuji Xerox Company). Report Presented in the Third Forum (December, Tokyo), The Japanese Association of Management Accounting.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oshita, J. (2012, December). Paradox of Control and Management Accounting. Annual Report of Economics Science, Kyushu Association of Economic Science, 50, 19–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reuer, J. J., & Tong, T. W. (2010, January–February). Discovering Valuable Growth, Opportunities: An Analysis of Equity Alliances with IPO Firms. Organization Science, 21(1), 201–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rimienè, K. (2011). Supply Chain Agility Concept Evolution (1990–2010). Economics and Management, 16, 892–899.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuels, J. M. (1965). Opportunity Costing. Journal of Accounting Research, 3(2), 182–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sawhney, M., Wolcott, R. C., & Arroniz, I. (2006). The 12 Different Ways for Companies to Innovate, MIT Sloan Management Review, Winter (ibid., 28–34).

    Google Scholar 

  • Scapens, R. W. (1991). Management Accounting: A Review of Contemporary Developments (2nd ed.). London: Macmillan Education Ltd.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Seiko-Epson Corporation. (2012), Annual Securities Report. www.epson.jp/IR/library/yuho/yuho-bbn.htm.

  • Shane, S. (2000, July–August). Prior Knowledge and the Discovery of Entrepreneurial Opportunities. Organization Science, 11(4), 448–469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shank, J. K., & Fisher, J. (1999). Case Study Target Costing as a Strategic Tool. MIT Sloan Management Review, 41(Fall), 73–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharif, H., & Zhang, Z. (1999). A Methodology for Achieving Agility in Manufactring Organizations: An Introduction. International Journal of Production Economics, 62, 7–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simanis, E., & Hart, S. (2009, Summer). Innovation from the Inside Out. MIT Sloan Management Review, 9–18. Sloan-select Collection.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simons, R. (1995). Levers of Control: How Managers Use Innovative Control Systems to Drive Strategic Renewal. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanaka, M. (2008). Report on Practical Improvement of Accounting for Manufacturing: Practices of J Cost Theory, MMRC Discussion Paper, No. 208, Manufacturing Management Research Center, Tokyo University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanaka, M. (2009). Accounting of Toyota Type of Improvement (Kaizen). Tokyo: Chukei Publisher.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Appendix

Appendix

Table 5.3 Employee number (EN), sales, and industrial sector of the investigated companies (2011) (money amount in 100 million yen)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Nishimura, A. (2019). Profit Opportunity, Strategic Innovation, and Management Accounting. In: Management, Uncertainty, and Accounting. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-8989-3_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics