Skip to main content

Effects of Corporate Social Performance on Default Risk: Structural Model-Based Analysis on Japanese Firms

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Advances in Japanese Business and Economics ((AJBE))

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    CSR activities might enhance the long-term profitability of the firm, but this is not the focus of this study, in which we discuss default within a relatively short term. It is difficult to assume that firms can reduce asset volatility without lowering the growth rate of assets in the short term.

  2. 2.

    According to Suto and Takehara (2015), the average response rate to Toyo Keizai’s CSR questionnaire survey for 2007–2011 is 29.7%.

  3. 3.

    The slopes for other control variables are not reported because of space constraints. They are available from the authors upon request.

  4. 4.

    In cases in which it is difficult to obtain the estimate of drift with precision, practitioners often set the drift equal to 0 when they compute risk measures. This accepted practice and the low risk-free interest rate in our observation period warrants our assumption that μ A  = r f .

  5. 5.

    These notations are from Sundaram and Das (2011).

  6. 6.

    Recall that the LGD is a percentage of principal debt and interest on a debt that will not be recovered if a borrower defaults. Since the recovery rate (RR) is defined as 1 − LGD, it is the proportion of principal debt and interest that can be recovered expressed as a percentage of the debt instrument’s face value.

  7. 7.

    To simplify the discussion, we set the risk-free interest rate at 2% and assume that it is constant during our sample period.

References

  • Ajward, A.R., and H. Takehara. 2014. Does superior corporate social performance ease financial constraints of companies? The Japanese experience. Global Economy and Finance Journal 7 (2): 42–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arikawa, Y., and H. Miyajima. 2005. Relationship banking and debt choice: Evidence from Japan. Corporate Governance: An International Review 13 (3): 408–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Black, F., and M. Scholes. 1973. The pricing of options and corporate liabilities. Journal of Political Economy 81 (3): 637–654.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boutin-Dufresne, F., and P. Savaria. 2004. Corporate social responsibility and financial risk. Journal of Investing 13 (1): 57–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, T., Y. Yan, and L. Chou. 2013. Is default probability associated with corporate social responsibility? Asia-Pacific Journal of Accounting and Economics 20 (4): 457–472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delianedis, G., and R. Geske. 2003. Credit risk and risk neutral default probabilities: Information about rating migrations and default. Working Paper, University of California, Los Angeles.

    Google Scholar 

  • El Ghoul, S.E., O. Guedhami, C.Y. Kwok, and D.R. Mishra. 2011. Does corporate social responsibility affect the cost of capital? Journal of Banking and Finance 35 (9): 2388–2406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fazzari, S., R.G. Hubbard, and B. Petersen. 1988. Finance constraints and corporate investment. Brookings Paper on Economic Activity 1988 (1): 141–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goss, A., and G.S. Roberts. 2011. The impact of corporate social responsibility on the cost of bank loan. Journal of Banking and Finance 35 (7): 1794–1810.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gregory, A., R. Tharyan, and J. Whittaker. 2014. Corporate social responsibility and firm value: Disaggregating the effects on cash flow, risk and growth. Journal of Business Ethics 124 (4): 633–657.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guariglia, A. 2008. Internal financial constraints, external financial constraints, and investment choice: Evidence from a panel of UK firms. Journal of Banking and Finance 32 (9): 1795–1809.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoshi, T., A.K. Kashyap, and D. Scharfstein. 1991. Corporate structure, liquidity, and investment: Evidence from Japanese industrial groups. Quarterly Journal of Economics 106 (1): 33–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jarrow, R.A., and S.M. Turnbull. 1995. Pricing derivatives on financial securities subject to credit risk. Journal of Finance 50 (1): 53–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menz, K.M. 2010. Corporate social responsibility: Is it rewarded by the corporate bond market? A critical note. Journal of Business Ethics 96 (1): 117–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merton, R. 1974. On the pricing of corporate debt: The risk structure of interest rates. Journal of Finance 29 (2): 449–470.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mishra, S., and S.B. Modi. 2013. Positive and negative corporate social responsibility, financial leverage, and idiosyncratic risk. Journal of Business Ethics 117 (2): 431–448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salama, A., K. Anderson, and J.S. Toms. 2011. Does community and environmental responsibility affect firm risk? Evidence from UK panel data 1994–2006. Business Ethics: A European Review 20 (2): 192–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sundaram, R., and S. Das. 2011. Derivatives: Principles and Practice. McGraw-Hill/Irwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suto, M., and H. Takehara. 2015. The link between corporate social performance and financial performance: Empirical evidence from Japanese firms. International Journal of Corporate Strategy and Social Responsibility 1 (1): 4–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vassalou, M., and Y. Xing. 2004. Default risk in equity returns. Journal of Finance 59 (2): 831–868.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, H. 1982. Instrumental variables regression with independent observations. Econometrica 50: 483–499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Megumi Suto .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Suto, M., Takehara, H. (2018). Effects of Corporate Social Performance on Default Risk: Structural Model-Based Analysis on Japanese Firms. In: Corporate Social Responsibility and Corporate Finance in Japan. Advances in Japanese Business and Economics. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-8986-2_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics