Corporate Social Performance and Corporate Financial Performance

  • Megumi SutoEmail author
  • Hitoshi Takehara
Part of the Advances in Japanese Business and Economics book series (AJBE)


As discussed in Chap.  2, awareness and practices of corporate social responsibility (CSR) have significantly changed since the 2000s by globalization of business and stock ownership structure. Owing to the prolonged economic stagnancy since the beginning of 1990s, revitalization of the Japanese economy became the top agenda for government policy, and the economic responsibility of corporations was interpreted as their primary responsibility. Since the beginning of the 2000s, Japanese corporations seem to have begun to review CSR activities to find a new path to stakeholder relationships in revitalization of business. Interesting research questions are how CSR activities link to economic performance and risk management, and how stakeholder management contribute to performance and risk in the context of Japanese firms in the 2000s.


Corporate Social Performance (CSP) Corporate Financial Performance (CFP) Stakeholder Management Stock Ownership Structure Prolonged Economic Stagnation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Aragon-Correa, A., and S. Sharma. 2003. A contingent resource-based view of proactive corporate environmental strategy. Academy of Management Review 28 (1): 71–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bhattacharya, C.B., and S. Sen. 2004. Doing better at doing good: When, why, and how consumers respond to corporate social initiatives. California Management Review 47 (1): 9–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Boutin-Dufresne, F., and P. Savaria. 2004. Corporate social responsibility and financial risk. Journal of Investing 13: 57–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brammer, S., and A. Millington. 2005. Corporate reputation and philanthropy: An empirical analysis. Journal of Business Ethics 61: 29–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Clarkson, M.E. 1995. A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review 20 (1): 92–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Edmans, A. 2011. Does the stock market fully value intangibles? Employee satisfaction and equity price. Journal of Financial Economics 101: 621–640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. El Ghoul, S.E., O. Guedhami, C.Y. Kwok, and D.R. Mishra. 2011. Does corporate social responsibility affect the cost of capital? Journal of Banking & Finance 35 (9): 2388–2406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Faleye, O., and E.A. Trahan. 2011. Labor-friendly corporate practices: Is what is good for employees good for shareholders? Journal of Business Ethics 101: 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fama, E.F., and K.R. French. 1992. The cross-section of expected stock returns. Journal of Finance 47: 427–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fama, E.F., and K.R. French. 1993. Common risk factors in the returns on stocks and bonds. Journal of Financial Economics 33: 3–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Girerd-Potin, I., S. Jimenez-Garcés, and P. Louve. 2014. Which dimensions of social responsibility concern financial investors? Journal of Business Ethics 121: 559–576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Godfrey, P.C. 2005. The relationship between corporate philanthropy and shareholder wealth: A risk management perspective. Academy of Management Review 30 (4): 777–798.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Godfrey, P.C., C.B. Merrill, and J.M. Hansen. 2009. The relationship between corporate social responsibility and shareholder value: An empirical test of the risk management hypothesis. Strategic Management Journal 30: 425–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Goss, A., and G.S. Roberts. 2011. The impact of corporate social responsibility on the cost of bank loan. Journal of Banking & Finance 35: 1794–1810.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gregory, A., R. Tharyan, and J. Whittaker. 2014. Corporate social responsibility and firm value: Disaggregating the effects on cash flow, risk and growth. Journal of Business Ethics 124: 633–657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Guenster, N., R. Bauer, J. Derwall, and K. Koedijk. 2011. The economic value of corporate eco-efficiency. European Financial Management 17 (4): 679–704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hart, S.L. 1995. A natural resource-based view of the firm. Academy of Management Review 20 (4): 986–1014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hart, S.L., M.B. Milstein., and J. Caggiano. 2003. Creating sustainable value. Academy of Management Executive 17 (2): 56–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hillman, A.J., and G.D. Keim. 2001. Shareholder value, stakeholder management and social issues: What’s the bottom line? Strategic Management Journal 22 (2): 125–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Jagannathan, R., K. Kubota, and H. Takehara. 1998. Relationship between labor-income risk and average return: Empirical evidence from the Japanese stock market. Journal of Business 71: 319–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Jensen, M.C. 2001. Value maximization, stakeholder theory, and the corporate objective function. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance 14 (3): 21–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Jiao, Y. 2010. Stakeholder welfare and firm value. Journal of Banking & Finance 34: 2549–2561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kubota, K., and H. Takehara. 2007. Effects of tax rate changes on the cost of capital: Case of Japanese Firms. Finanz Archiv/Public Finance Analysis 63 (2): 163–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lopatta, K., and T. Kaspereit. 2014. The world capital markets’ perception of sustainability and the impact of the financial crisis. Journal of Business Ethics 122: 475–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. McGuire, J.B., A. Sundgren, and T. Schneeweis. 1988. Corporate social responsibility and firm financial performance. Academy of Management Journal 31 (4): 854–872.Google Scholar
  26. McWilliams, A., and D.S. Siegel. 2001. Corporate social responsibility: A theory of the firm perspective. Academy of Management Review 26 (1): 117–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Menz, K.M. 2010. Corporate social responsibility: Is it rewarded by the corporate bond market? A critical note. Journal of Business Ethics 96 (1): 117–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mishra, S., and S.B. Modi. 2013. Positive and negative corporate social responsibility, financial leverage, and idiosyncratic risk. Journal of Business Ethics 117: 431–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Orlitzky, M. 2008. Corporate social performance and financial performance: A research synthesis. In The Oxford Handbook of Corporate Social Responsibility, edited by A. Crane, A. McWilliam, D. Matten, J. Moon, and D. S. Siegel, 113–136. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Orlitzky, M., and J. Benjamin. 2001. Corporate social performance and firm risk: A meta analytic view. Business and Society 40 (4): 369–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Orlitzky, M., F.L. Schmidt, and S.L. Rynes. 2003. Corporate social and financial performance: A meta-analysis. Organization Studies 24 (3): 403–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Perrini, F., A. Russo, A. Tancati, and C. Vurro. 2011. Deconstructing the relationship between corporate social and financial performance. Journal of Business Ethics 102: 59–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Petersen, M.A. 2009. Estimating standard errors in finance panel data sets: Comparing approaches. Review of Financial Studies 22: 435–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Russo, M., and P.A. Fouts. 1997. A resource-based perspective on corporate environmental performance and profitability. Academy of Management Journal 40: 534–559.Google Scholar
  35. Salama, A., K. Anderson, and J.S. Toms. 2011. Does community and environmental responsibility affect firm risk? Evidence from UK panel data 1994–2006. Business Ethics: A European Review 20 (2): 192–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Scholtens, B., and Y. Zhou. 2008. Stakeholder relations and financial performance. Sustainable Development 16: 213–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Schuler, D.A., and M. Cording. 2006. A corporate social performance-corporate financial performance behavioral model for consumers. Academy of Management Review 31 (3): 540–558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Servaes, H., and A. Tamayo. 2013. The impact of corporate social responsibility on firm value: The role of customer awareness. Management Science 59 (5): 1045–1061.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Smith, N. C. 2008. Consumers as drivers of corporate social responsibility,” ed. by A. Crane, A. McWilliams, D. Matten, J. Moon, and D. S. Stiegel, The Oxford Handbook of Corporate Social Responsibility, 281–302.Google Scholar
  40. Spicer, B.H. 1978. Investors, corporate social performance, and information disclosure: An empirical study. The Accounting Review 53: 94–111.Google Scholar
  41. Surroca, J., J. Tribo, and S. Waddock. 2010. Corporate responsibility and financial performance: The role of intangible resources. Strategic Management Journal 31 (5): 463–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Suto, M., and H. Takehara. 2016. Estimating the hidden corporate social performance of Japanese firms. Social Responsibility Journal 12 (2): 348–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Turban, D.B., and D.W. Greening. 1997. Corporate social performance and organizational attractiveness to prospective employers. Academy of Management Journal 40 (3): 658–672.Google Scholar
  44. Ullman, A. 1985. Data in search of a theory: A critical examination of the relationships among social performance, social disclosure, and economic performance of U.S. firms. Academy of Management Review 10: 540–577.Google Scholar
  45. Wolf, J. 2014. The relationship between sustainable supply chain management, stakeholder pressure and corporate sustainability performance. Journal of Business Ethics 119: 317–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Waseda UniversityTokyoJapan
  2. 2.Waseda UniversityTokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations