Abstract
Miki Kiyoshi tried to grasp the continuities and discontinuities between nature and humanity, and between nature and culture, but it is not enough. If we were to make Miki’s conception into an abstract logic it would probably be a logic similar to Nishida’s “absolutely contradictory self-identity” [絶対矛盾的自己同一], but unlike Nishida Miki’s particular strength lay in drawing a logic out of an analysis of concrete phenomena. Miki needed to clarify the logic of discontinuity and continuity in the midst of concretely analyzing the difference and commonality between the forms of nature and the forms of human culture, and between the technology of nature and the technology of human beings, but he stopped mid-way.
Translated from the Japanese by Robert Chapeskie and revised by John W. M. Krummel.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Akamatsu, T. (2018). The Philosophy of Miki Kiyoshi. In: Fujita, M. (eds) The Philosophy of the Kyoto School. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-8983-1_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-8983-1_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-8982-4
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-8983-1
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)