Skip to main content

Regulating Cumulative Impacts in Groundwater Systems: Global Lessons from the Australian Experience

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Reforming Water Law and Governance

Abstract

The regulation of groundwater extraction has shifted, almost seismically, through Australia’s water reform era, which culminated in the National Water Initiative and the federal Water Act 2007 (Cth). Its starting point was minimal regulation, targeted at controlling selected extractions and pursuing sustainability for consumptive purposes. Since then, groundwater laws have imported regulatory concepts from the surface water sphere; among them, regulating extraction through statutory plans and in a broad-based way, and protecting dependent ecosystems. One issue emerges at the heart of both the history and future of groundwater reform: dealing with the cumulative impacts of extraction. This chapter reviews how groundwater reforms in Australia have approached cumulative impacts—albeit often implicitly rather than explicitly—measured against concepts of cumulative impact assessment derived from the scientific environmental assessment literature. It finds that both regulatory and non-regulatory, incentive-based measures have been used. As water reforms have progressed, arrangements for assessing and managing the cumulative impacts of groundwater extraction have taken a dramatically broader view of potentially affected natural systems, as well as consumptive values. However, they have not focused significantly on the implications of connections between natural systems. Reforms have also resulted in a much broader view of the impacting activities that are relevant to an assessment of cumulative impacts, though often with an unclear temporal scope. Remaining weaknesses in approaches to managing cumulative impacts and a lack of empirical evidence as to the effectiveness of existing measures warrant attention. The chapter concludes by charting key challenges that remain for resolution, and setting out an accompanying research and reform agenda.

This is a revised version of a journal article that was first published by Thomson Reuters as Rebecca Nelson, “Broadening Regulatory Concepts and Responses to Cumulative Impacts: Considering the Trajectory and Future of Groundwater Law and Policy” (2016) 33(4) Environmental and Planning Law Journal 356–371. For all subscription inquiries please phone, from Australia: 1300 304 195, from Overseas: +61 2 8587 7980 or online at legal.thomsonreuters.com.au/search. The official PDF version of this article can also be purchased separately from Thomson Reuters at http://sites.thomsonreuters.com.au/journals/subscribe-or-purchase.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adelaide and Mount Lofty Ranges Natural Resources Management Board. (2013). Water Allocation Plan: Western Mt Lofty Ranges. Adelaide: Government of South Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agriculture and Resource Management Council of Australia and New Zealand and Standing Committee on Agriculture and Resource Management. (1996). Allocation and use of groundwater: A national framework for improved groundwater management in Australia—Policy position paper for advice to States and Territories. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Government. (2015). Our north, our future: White paper on developing Northern Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Badr, E.-S. A., Cashmore, M., & Cobb, D. (2004). The consideration of impacts upon the aquatic environment in environmental impact statements in England and Wales. Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy & Management, 6(1), 19–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bashour, L. (2016). Comparative analysis of enabling legislation for EIA follow-up in Lebanon, Palestine and Jordan (and Aqaba). Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 34(1), 72–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basin Plan. (2012). (Cth).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bates, B., et al. (2008). Climate change and water. Geneva: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.

    Google Scholar 

  • BHP Billiton. (2016). Draft MNES Program, Pilbara Strategic Assessment. http://www.bhpbilliton.com/-/media/bhp/regulatory-information-media/iron-ore/western-australia-iron-ore/0000/mnes-program/160316_ironore_waio_pilbarastrategicassessment_commonwealth_draftmnesprogram.pdf. Accessed 30 Jan 2017.

  • Bubna-Litic, K. (2015). Fracking in Australia: The future in South Australia? Environmental and Planning Law Journal, 32(5), 437–454.

    Google Scholar 

  • Canter, L., Atkinson, S. F., & Sadler, B. (2010). Introduction to a special issue on cumulative effects assessment and management. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 28(4), 259–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Commission of European Communities. (2001). Directive 2001/42/EC of the European Parliament and the Council of 27 June on the assessment of the effects of certain plans and programmes on the environment. Official Journal of the European Communities 197(30), Annex I.

    Google Scholar 

  • Commonwealth of Australia. (2004). Intergovernmental Agreement on a National Water Initiative.

    Google Scholar 

  • Commonwealth of Australia et al. (2012). National Partnership Agreement on Coal Seam Gas and Large Coal Mining Development. https://www.ehp.qld.gov.au/management/impact-assessment/pdf/partnership-agreement.pdf. Accessed 30 Jan 2017.

  • Contant, C. K., & Wiggins, L. L. (1991). Defining and analyzing cumulative environmental impacts. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 11(4), 297–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, L. M., & Sheate, W. R. (2002). Cumulative effects assessment: a review of UK environmental impact statements. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 22(4), 415–439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Council on Environmental Quality. (1997). Considering cumulative effects under the National Environmental Policy Act. United States: Executive Office of the President.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cullen, P. (2006). Flying blind: The disconnect between groundwater and policy. Canberra: National Water Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of the Environment, Australian Government. (2013). Significant impact guidelines 1.3: Coal seam gas and large coal mining developments—impacts on water resources. Canberra: Australian Government.

    Google Scholar 

  • Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act. (1999). (Cth).

    Google Scholar 

  • Foley, M. M., et al. (2017). The challenges and opportunities in cumulative effects assessment. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 62, 122–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Folkeson, L., Antonson, H., & Helldin, J. O. (2013). Planners’ views on cumulative effects: A focus-group study concerning transport infrastructure planning in Sweden. Land Use Policy, 30(1), 243–253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forbes, M., et al. (2014). Report to the MDBA by the review panel for the Goulburn-Murray sedimentary plain SDL area in Victoria. http://www.mdba.gov.au/sites/default/files/pubs/GM-sed-plain-groundwater-review-panel.pdf. Accessed 30 Jan 2017.

  • Fullagar, I. (2004). Rivers and aquifers: Towards conjunctive water management (workshop proceedings). Canberra: Bureau of Rural Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howe, P. (2011). Framework for assessing potential local and cumulative effects of mining on groundwater resources—project summary report. Canberra: National Water Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, D. P. (2013). Impact assessment: Practical solutions to recurrent problems and contemporary challenges. Hoboken: Wiley.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Maher, M., Neville, J., & Nichols, P. (2001). Improving the legislative basis for river management in Australia (stage 2 report: final report). Canberra: Land and Water Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, R., Arts, J., & Morrison-Saunders, A. (2005). International principles for best practice EIA follow-up. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 23(3), 175–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCallum, J. L., et al. (2010). Impacts of climate change on groundwater in Australia: A sensitivity analysis of recharge. Hydrogeology Journal, 18(7), 1625–1638.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGrath, C. (2005). Avoiding the legal pitfalls in the EPBC Act by understanding its key concepts. National Environmental Law Review, 32, 37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merz, S. K., CSIRO, & Bureau of Rural Sciences. (2010). Surface and/or groundwater interception activities: Initial estimates. Canberra: National Water Commission Waterlines Report Series No 30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minister for Water, Victoria. (2014). Policies for managing take and use licences 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray-Darling Basin Authority. (2012). The proposed groundwater baseline and sustainable diversion limits: Methods report. Canberra: Murray-Darling Basin Authority.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Water Commission. (2011). The National Water Initiative—securing Australia’s water future: 2011 assessment. Canberra: National Water Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Water Commission. (2012). Groundwater essentials. Canberra: National Water Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Water Commission. (2014). Australia’s water blueprint: National reform assessment 2014. Canberra: National Water Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Natural Resources Management Act. (2004). (SA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, R. (2013). Groundwater, rivers and ecosystems: Comparative insights into law and policy for making the links. Australian Environment Review, 28, 558–566.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, R., & Perrone, D. (2016). Local groundwater withdrawal permitting laws in the south-western US: California in comparative context. Groundwater, 54(5), 747–753.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, R., & Quevauviller, P. (2016). Groundwater law. In Tony Jakeman et al (Eds.), Integrated groundwater management: Concepts, approaches and challenges (pp. 173–196). Online: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neville, J. (2003). Managing the cumulative effects of incremental development in freshwater resources. Environmental Planning and Law Journal, 20(2), 85–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • NSW Department of Primary Industries Office of Water. (2012). NSW aquifer interference policy: NSW government policy for the licensing and assessment of aquifer interference activities. New South Wales: NSW Department of Primary Industries.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, S., et al. (2011). Evolving issues and practices in groundwater-dependent ecosystem management. Canberra: National Water Commission Waterlines Report Series No 46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petroleum and Gas (Production and Safety) Act. (2004) (Qld).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pigram, J. (2006). Australia’s water resources: From use to management. Collingwood: CSIRO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Randall, A. (2012). Coal seam gas—toward a risk management framework for a novel intervention. Environmental and Planning Law Journal, 29, 152–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reid-Piko, C., et al. (2010). Ecosystem services and productive base for the Basin Plan: final report. Canberra: Murray-Darling Basin Authority.

    Google Scholar 

  • RPS Australia East Pty Ltd. (2011). Onshore co-produced water: Extent and management. Canberra: National Water Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinclair, J. A., Doelleb, M., & Duinker, P. N. (2017). Looking up, down, and sideways: Reconceiving cumulative effects assessment as a mindset. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 62, 183–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Standing Council on Energy and Resources. (2013). National harmonised regulatory framework for natural gas from coal seams. http://www.coagenergycouncil.gov.au/sites/prod.energycouncil/files/publications/documents/National-Harmonised-Regulatory-Framework-for-Natural-Gas-from-Coal-Seams_1.pdf. Accessed 30 Jan 2017.

  • Tarkine National Coalition v Minister for the Environment. (2015). FCAFC 89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tularam, G. A., & Krishna, M. (2009). Long term consequences of groundwater pumping in Australia: A review of impacts around the globe. Journal of Applied Sciences in Environmental Sanitation, 4(2), 151–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wade, A. (2014). Goulburn-Murray Sedimentary Plain Groundwater Sustainable Diversion Limit Review Synthesis Report. Richmond North: Aquade Pty Ltd. http://www.mdba.gov.au/sites/default/files/pubs/GM-sed-plain-synthesis-report.pdf. Accessed 30 Jan 2017.

  • Water Act. (1989). (Vic).

    Google Scholar 

  • Water Act. (2000). (Qld).

    Google Scholar 

  • Water Act. (2007). (Cth).

    Google Scholar 

  • Water Management Act. (2000). (NSW).

    Google Scholar 

  • Water Sharing Plan for the Greater Metropolitan Region Groundwater Sources. (2011). (NSW).

    Google Scholar 

  • Werner, A. D. (2010). A review of seawater intrusion and its management in Australia. Hydrogeology Journal, 18(1), 281–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rebecca Louise Nelson .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Nelson, R.L. (2018). Regulating Cumulative Impacts in Groundwater Systems: Global Lessons from the Australian Experience. In: Holley, C., Sinclair, D. (eds) Reforming Water Law and Governance. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-8977-0_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-8977-0_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-8976-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-8977-0

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics