Abstract
The establishment of global value chains requires changes in the approach to market surveillance . Intermediate inputs have become an important part of the world trade, particularly as they are increasingly being sourced through imports rather than domestic production. The nature of internal markets combined with the effects of the global supply chain makes it increasingly necessary to adopt a truly coordinated approach to market surveillance . Market surveillance practices among the European Union Member States and worldwide differ by each country. Within the European Union it is the responsibility of each individual Member State, which has different resources , priorities and legislative framework, to develop and sustain their internal market surveillance . Different countries around the world develop their own standardization arrangements and start to produce more products that only conform to their own safety standards. The aim of this chapter is to analyse approaches to market surveillance through different product groups, in order to evaluate the differences between the sectors and countries.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Ali, S., & Dadush, U. (2011). The rise of trade in intermediates: Policy implications. International Economic Bulletin, 10. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, Retrieved from http://carnegieendowment.org/2011/02/10/rise-of-trade-inintermediates-policy-implications/458.
Baram, M. (2007). Liability and its influence on designing for product and process safety. Safety Science, 45(1), 11–30.
Berman, B., & Swani, K. (2010). Managing product safety of imported Chinese goods. Business Horizons, 53(1), 39–48.
Coulibaly, A., Houssin, R., & Mutel, B. (2008). Maintainability and safety indicators at design stage for mechanical products. Computers in Industry, 59(5), 438–449.
Disdier, A. C., Fontagne, L., & Mimouni, M. (2008). The impact of regulations on agricultural trade: Evidence from the SPS and TBT Agreements, 0063 bn’? 006CZm.
European Commission Rapid Alert System (RAPEX) (2017). Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/consumers/consumers_safety/safety_products/rapex/alerts/main/?event=main.search.
Fiegenwald, V., Bassetto, S., & Tollenaere, M. (2013). Controlling non-conformities propagation in manufacturing. International Journal of Production Research, 52(14), 4118–4131.
Hendrikx, I., Tuneski, N., & Jovanoski, B. D. (2016). Dynamic simulations of market surveillance actions. In 2016 IEEE symposium on product compliance engineering (ISPCE), Anaheim, CA, pp. 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/ispce.2016.7492846.
Horaa, M., Bapuji, H., & Roth, A. V. (2011). Safety hazard and time to recall: The role of recall strategy, product defect type, and supply chain player in the U.S. toy industry. Journal of Operational Management, 29(7), 766–777.
Ibrahim, H. W., Zailani, S., & Tan, K. C. (2015). A content analysis of global supply chain research. An International Journal, 22(7), 1429–1462.
International Organization for Standardization (ISO) (2012). A guide to good practice principles and practices in product regulation and market surveillance. Retrieved from http://www.iso.org/iso/casco_guide.pdf.
Liepiņa, R., & Korabļova, L. (2014). Market surveillance of toys: Situation assessment and improvement. In 19th International scientific conference: Economics management 2014, ICEM 2014.
Maruchek, A., Greis, N., Mena, C., & Cai, L. (2011). Product safety and security in the global supply chain: Issues challenges and research opportunities. Journal of Operational Management, 29(7), 707–720.
Mauborgne, P., Deniaud, S., Levrat, E., Bonjour, E., Micaëlli, J.-P., & Loise, D. (2016). Operational and system hazard analysis in a safe systems requirement engineering process—Application to automotive industry. Safety Science, 87(August), 256–268.
Meixell, M. J., & Gargeya, V. B. (2005). Global supply chain design: A literature review and critique. Transportation Research Part E, 41(6), 531–550.
Midler, P. (2007). Quality fad: China’s great business challenge. Retrieved from http://knowledge.wharton.upenn.edu/article.cfm?articleid=1776.
Mrugalska, B., & Tytyk, E. (2015). Quality control methods for product reliability and safety. Procedia Manufacturing, 3(1), 2730–2737.
Official Website of the European Commission (2016a). Eurostat. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/tgm/table.do?tab=table&init=1&language=en&pcode=tps00001&plugin=1.
Official Website of the European Commission (2016b). List of National Market Surveillance Authorities by sector. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/DocsRoom/documents/20322/attachments/1/translations/.
Official Website of the European Commission (2016c). List of National Market Surveillance Authorities by EU Country. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/DocsRoom/documents/20321/attachments/1/translations/.
Official Website of the European Union (2016d). Living in the EU. Retrieved from https://europa.eu/european-union/about-eu/figures/living_en.
Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and the World Bank Group (2015). Policy options in trade and complementary areas for GVC integration by small and medium enterprises and low-income developing counties. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/trade/OECD-WBG-g20-gvc-report-2015.pdf.
Product Safety Forum of Europe (Prosafe) (2013). Best practices techniques in market surveillance. Retrieved from http://www.prosafe.org/index.php?option=com_zoo&task=item&item_id=1490&Itemid=270.
Pyke, D., & Tang, C. S. (2010). How to mitigate product safety risks proactively? Process, Challenges and Opportunities. International Journal of Logistics Research and Application: A Leading Journal of Supply Chain Management, 13(4), 243–256.
Rausand, M., & Utne, I. B. (2009). Product safety—Principles and practices in a life cycle perspective. Safety Science, 47(7), 939–947.
Regulation of 7 July 2008 No. 765/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council setting out the requirements for accreditation and market surveillance relating to the marketing of product and repealing Regulation (EEC) No. 339/93. Retrieved from http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32008R0765.
Ruiz-Torres, A. J., & Mahmoodi, F. (2008). Outsourcing decision in manufacturing supply chains considering production failure and operating costs. An International Journal Integrated Supply Management, 4(2), 141–158.
Singh, R. K., & Sharma, P. B. (2014). Development of framework for analyzing flexibility in supply chain. In M. K. Nandakumar et al. (Eds.), Organisational flexibility and competitiveness, flexible system management. India: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/987-81-322-1668-1_19.
Statistics Canada (2016). Retrieved from http://www.statcan.gc.ca/tables-tableaux/sum-som/l01/cst01/demo02a-eng.htm.
Tang, C. S. (2008). Making products safe: Process and challenges. International Commerce Review, 8(1), 48–55.
The Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) Global Portal on Product Recalls. Retrieved from http://globalrecalls.oecd.org/.
van Tongeren, F., Beghin, J., & Marette, S. (2009). A cost-benefit framework for the assessment of non-tariff measures in agro-food trade. In OECD Food, Agriculture, and Fisheries Working Paper 21, OECD Publishing, Paris.
van Tongeren, F., Disdier, A. C., Ilicic-Komorowska, J., Marette, S., & von Lampe, M. (2010). Case studies of costs and benefits of non-tariff measures: Cheese, Shrimp, and Flowers. In: OECD Food, Agriculture, and Fisheries Working Paper 28, OECD Publishing, Paris.
Vasara, J., & Kivistö-Rahnasto, J. (2015). A qualitative examination of safety-related compliance challenges for global manufacturing. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 16(4), 429–446.
Wainwright, N. (2014). Ten years of joint cross-border EMC market surveillance. But are products any more compliant? In Proceeding of the 2014 international symposium on electromagnetic compatibility (EMC Europa 2014), Gothenburg, Sweden, Sept 1–4, 2014.
Walkington, J., Sugavanam, S., & Nunns, S. R. (2013). One approach to functional safety assurance and safety lifecycle compliance. In 8th IET international system safety conference incorporating the cyber security conference 2013.
Wogalter, M. S., Laughery, K. R., Vredenburgh, A. G., Deppa, S. W., Lueder, R., & Zackowitz, I. B. (2014). Child injury: Forensic human factors points to the need for better product designs and warnings. In Proceeding of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 58th annual meeting.
Working Party of Regulation Cooperation and Standardization Policies (2009). Market surveillance update on the market surveillance initiative draft guide to the use of the general market surveillance procedure. Retrieved from https://www.unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/trade/wp6/documents/2009/wp6_09_GMS_012E.pdf.
Xiulia, L., Baozhia, C., Yinglib, B., & Baohong, Z. (2012). Study on effect of product liability to inherent safety. Procedia Engineering, 45, 271–275.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Mjakuškina, S., Lapiņa, I. (2018). Evaluation of Market Surveillance Implementation and Sustainability. In: Connell, J., Agarwal, R., Sushil, Dhir, S. (eds) Global Value Chains, Flexibility and Sustainability. Flexible Systems Management. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-8929-9_17
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-8929-9_17
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-8928-2
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-8929-9
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)