Advertisement

Sustainability in Conformity Assessment: Flexibility of Technical Harmonization

  • Raimonda Liepiņa
  • Inga Lapiņa
  • Jānis Mazais
Chapter
Part of the Flexible Systems Management book series (FLEXSYS)

Abstract

The beginnings of the European Union (EU) can be attributed to the desire to promote mutual cooperation and trade in order to support production facilitation. This chapter aims to present recommendations for the improvement of the technical harmonization and conformity assessment system based on the evaluation of the existing approaches. The necessity for assessment of the existing technical harmonization approaches arose in line with the development of manufacturing and technologies, changes in management strategies and development of global value chains (GVC) where different stages of the production process are located across different countries. The research mainly employed qualitative research methods: analysis of regulations and binding documents, logical constructive analysis and comparison, interviews with experts. The authors have established an interrelation between the technical harmonization approaches and are proposing to adopt a new approach—the Technical Harmonization Approach. Through that authors encompass all elements that are essential for product quality assurance and conformity assessment to facilitate product global supply and distribution. In addition, the authors propose to adopt unified requirements for metrology and conformity assessment of products when they are in use within the EU single market. In order to facilitate the application of requirements, the authors have grouped them and propose to separately regulate each of these groups. Through that authors propose development of post sales activities. The development of methodologies of technical harmonization approaches would facilitate the work of manufacturers and other stakeholders; it would promote manufacturing of qualitative products as well as sustainable development of entrepreneurship. It is suggested that the results of this research can be used by a number of stakeholders: manufacturers, traders, consumers, etc. At the same time, the results can be used as a basis for further improvement of technical harmonization approaches and sustainability of conformity assessment that would facilitate global trade and help manufacturers to participate in GVCs.

Keywords

Conformity assessment Flexible systems management Global value chain Technical harmonization 

References

  1. Alesina, A., Angeloni, I., & Schuknecht, L. (2005). What does the European Union do? Public Choice, 123(3–4), 275–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Andersson, F., Arvķus, C., Haase, P., & Renman, A. (2008). Measures for enhanced co-operation in the area of technical rules, Part 3. The contribution of trade to a New EU growth strategy, Ideas for a more Open European Economy. Kommerskollegium National Board of Trade, Stockholm, Sweden. http://www.kommers.se/upload/Analysarkiv/In%20English/Analyses/LS%20Technicalrules.pdf.
  3. Behme, C. (2016). The principle of mutual recognition in the european internal market with special regard to the cross-border mobility of companies. European Company & Financial Law Review, 13(1), 31–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Burrows, N. (2011). Harmonisation of technical standards: reculer pour mieux sauter? The Modern Law Review, 53(5), 597–603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Council Decision 93/465/EEC of 22 July 1993 Concerning the modules for the various phases of the conformity assessment procedures and the rules for the affixing and use of the CE conformity marking, which are intended to be used in the technical harmonisation directives. Official Journal of the European Communities, 30.8.93(L223), 23–39. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:1993:220:0023:0039:EN:PDF.
  6. Council Resolution of 10 November 2003 on the Communication of the European Commission ‘enhancing the implementation of the new approach directives’. Official Journal of the European Communities, 2003/C 282, 3–4. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:C:2003:282:0003:0004:EN:PDF.
  7. Council Resolution of 21 December 1989 on a Global approach to Conformity Assessment. Official Journal of the European Communities, 16.1. 90/C 10, 1–2. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:C:1990:010:0001:0002:EN:PDF.
  8. Council Resolution of 7 May 1985 on a New approach to technical harmonization and standards. Official Journal of the European Communities, 4.6. 85/C 136, 1–9. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:C:1985:136:0001:0009:EN:PDF.
  9. Crenna, F., Rossi, G. B., & Bovio, L. (2009). Probabilistic measurement evaluation for the implementation of the measuring instrument directive. Measurement, 42(10), 1522–1531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. European Commission (EC). (2000). Guide to the implementation of directives based on the new approach and the global approach. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.Google Scholar
  11. Filiač, V. (2003). Conformity assessment to electrical products in the CR. Electrical Engineering, Czech Industry, 4, 10–11.Google Scholar
  12. Gattorna, J. (2013). The influence in customer buying behaviour on product flow patterns between trading countries, and the implications for regulatory policy. In Global value chains in a changing world (pp. 201–244). WTO Publications.Google Scholar
  13. Gereffi, G., & Fernandez-Stark, K. (2016). Global value chain analysis: A primer (p. 34). Center on Globalization, Governance & Competitiveness, Duke University. http://www.cggc.duke.edu/pdfs/Duke_CGGC_Global_Value_Chain_GVC_Analysis_Primer_2nd_Ed_2016.pdf.
  14. Gereffi, G., Humphrey, J., & Sturgeon, T. (2005). The governance of global value chains. Review of International Political Economy, 12(1), 78–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gehring, T., & Kerler, M. (2008). Institutional stimulation of deliberative—Decision-making: division of labour, deliberative legitimacy and technical regulation in the European single market. Journal of Common Market Studies, 46(5), 1001–1023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ghannam, A. (2016). Business integration unit (BIU) adapted for industrial global value chain on the web. Journal of Electrical Systems and Information Technology, 3(1), 127–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Inomata, S. (2017). Analytical frameworks for global value chains: An overview. Global value chain development report 2017 “measuring and analyzing the impact of GVCs on economic development” (chapter 1, pp. 15–28). International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank. https://www.wto.org/english/res_e/booksp_e/gvcs_report_2017.pdf.
  18. Liepiņa, R., Lapiņa, I., & Mazais, J. (2013). Improvement of conformity assessment system: technical harmonization adjustment. In Proceedings of the 17th World Multi-Conference on Systemics, Cybernetics and Informatics (Vol. II, pp. 37–42). Orlando, Florida, USA.Google Scholar
  19. Lohbeck, D. (1998). CE marking handbook. A practical approach to global safety certification. Chapter 1—Europe’s Approach to Total Harmonization. Elsevier Inc.Google Scholar
  20. Maciejewski, M. (2017). Free movement of goods. Fact sheets on the European Union—2017 (pp. 1–5). Available at: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/ftu/pdf/en/FTU_3.1.2.pdf.
  21. Masserlin, P. (2011). The European Union single market in goods: Between mutual recognition and harmonisation. Australian Journal of International Affairs, 65(4), 410–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Mishra, R., Pundir, A. K., & Ganapathy, L. (2014). Manufacturing flexibility research: A review of literature and agenda for future research. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 15(2), 101–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Nicolaides, P. (1998). The role of member states as rule-makers in the European Union. Intereconomics, 33(1), 3–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Pelkmans, J. (1987). The new approach to technical harmonization and standardization. Journal of Common Market Studies, 25(3), 249–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Pelkmans, J. (2006). European industrial policy. International Handbook on Industrial Policy, 45–78.Google Scholar
  26. Playle, M. (2011). CE marking—The essential requirements. In C. Dale & T. Anderson (Eds.), Advances in systems safety (pp. 251–271). London: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Poncibò, C. (2007). Private certification schemes as consumer protection: A viable supplement to regulation in Europe? International Journal of Consumer Studies, 31(6), 656–661.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ruževičius, J. (2008). The study of quality certification system of Lithuania. Engineering Economics, 2(57), 78–84.Google Scholar
  29. Saam, N., & Sumpter, D. (2008). EU institutional reforms. How do member states reach a decision? Journal of Policy Modeling, 30(1), 71–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Sheps, I. (2009). From product quality to organization quality. In Proceedings of Fifth International Working Conference “Total Quality Management—Advanced and Intelligent Approaches” (pp. 41–46). Belgrade.Google Scholar
  31. Stephenson, S. M. (1997). Standards, conformity assessment and developing countries. World Bank Research Working Paper No. 1826.Google Scholar
  32. Sushil. (2012). Multiple perspectives of flexible systems management. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 13(1), 1–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Tippman, C. (2013). The national quality infrastructure, policy brief “the innovation policy platform” (pp. 1–12). https://innovationpolicyplatform.org/sites/default/files/rdf_imported_documents/TheNationalQualityInfrastructure.pdf.
  34. Tricker, R. (2000). CE conformity marking and new approach directives. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann Linacre House.Google Scholar
  35. Vaquier, C., Legrand, D., & Caldani, C. (2009). Qualification Opérationnelle du Systèmein Formatique d’un Depot de Sanget de ses Échanges Dedonnées. Transfusion Clinique et Biologique, 16(2), 245–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Yin, X., Dong, C., & Liu, C. (2017). Global value chain restructuring in the trade of knocked down products. Transactions of FAMENA, 41(1), 91–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Zhou, R. (2013). Research on vertical structure evolution of global value chain & enterprise innovation. In 2013 International Conference on Management Science and Engineering 20th Annual Conference Proceedings Management Science and Engineering (ICMSE) (pp. 1848–1853).Google Scholar
  38. Zlámalová, J. (2010). Chosen influences of “revision of new approach”. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, 291–296.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Raimonda Liepiņa
    • 1
  • Inga Lapiņa
    • 1
  • Jānis Mazais
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Quality Technologies, Institute for Quality Engineering, Faculty of Engineering Economics and ManagementRiga Technical UniversityRigaLatvia

Personalised recommendations