Abstract
The beginnings of the European Union (EU) can be attributed to the desire to promote mutual cooperation and trade in order to support production facilitation. This chapter aims to present recommendations for the improvement of the technical harmonization and conformity assessment system based on the evaluation of the existing approaches. The necessity for assessment of the existing technical harmonization approaches arose in line with the development of manufacturing and technologies, changes in management strategies and development of global value chains (GVC) where different stages of the production process are located across different countries. The research mainly employed qualitative research methods: analysis of regulations and binding documents, logical constructive analysis and comparison, interviews with experts. The authors have established an interrelation between the technical harmonization approaches and are proposing to adopt a new approach —the Technical Harmonization Approach. Through that authors encompass all elements that are essential for product quality assurance and conformity assessment to facilitate product global supply and distribution. In addition, the authors propose to adopt unified requirements for metrology and conformity assessment of products when they are in use within the EU single market. In order to facilitate the application of requirements, the authors have grouped them and propose to separately regulate each of these groups. Through that authors propose development of post sales activities. The development of methodologies of technical harmonization approaches would facilitate the work of manufacturers and other stakeholders ; it would promote manufacturing of qualitative products as well as sustainable development of entrepreneurship . It is suggested that the results of this research can be used by a number of stakeholders : manufacturers, traders, consumers, etc. At the same time, the results can be used as a basis for further improvement of technical harmonization approaches and sustainability of conformity assessment that would facilitate global trade and help manufacturers to participate in GVCs.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Alesina, A., Angeloni, I., & Schuknecht, L. (2005). What does the European Union do? Public Choice, 123(3–4), 275–319.
Andersson, F., Arvķus, C., Haase, P., & Renman, A. (2008). Measures for enhanced co-operation in the area of technical rules, Part 3. The contribution of trade to a New EU growth strategy, Ideas for a more Open European Economy. Kommerskollegium National Board of Trade, Stockholm, Sweden. http://www.kommers.se/upload/Analysarkiv/In%20English/Analyses/LS%20Technicalrules.pdf.
Behme, C. (2016). The principle of mutual recognition in the european internal market with special regard to the cross-border mobility of companies. European Company & Financial Law Review, 13(1), 31–54.
Burrows, N. (2011). Harmonisation of technical standards: reculer pour mieux sauter? The Modern Law Review, 53(5), 597–603.
Council Decision 93/465/EEC of 22 July 1993 Concerning the modules for the various phases of the conformity assessment procedures and the rules for the affixing and use of the CE conformity marking, which are intended to be used in the technical harmonisation directives. Official Journal of the European Communities, 30.8.93(L223), 23–39. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:1993:220:0023:0039:EN:PDF.
Council Resolution of 10 November 2003 on the Communication of the European Commission ‘enhancing the implementation of the new approach directives’. Official Journal of the European Communities, 2003/C 282, 3–4. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:C:2003:282:0003:0004:EN:PDF.
Council Resolution of 21 December 1989 on a Global approach to Conformity Assessment. Official Journal of the European Communities, 16.1. 90/C 10, 1–2. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:C:1990:010:0001:0002:EN:PDF.
Council Resolution of 7 May 1985 on a New approach to technical harmonization and standards. Official Journal of the European Communities, 4.6. 85/C 136, 1–9. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:C:1985:136:0001:0009:EN:PDF.
Crenna, F., Rossi, G. B., & Bovio, L. (2009). Probabilistic measurement evaluation for the implementation of the measuring instrument directive. Measurement, 42(10), 1522–1531.
European Commission (EC). (2000). Guide to the implementation of directives based on the new approach and the global approach. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
Filiač, V. (2003). Conformity assessment to electrical products in the CR. Electrical Engineering, Czech Industry, 4, 10–11.
Gattorna, J. (2013). The influence in customer buying behaviour on product flow patterns between trading countries, and the implications for regulatory policy. In Global value chains in a changing world (pp. 201–244). WTO Publications.
Gereffi, G., & Fernandez-Stark, K. (2016). Global value chain analysis: A primer (p. 34). Center on Globalization, Governance & Competitiveness, Duke University. http://www.cggc.duke.edu/pdfs/Duke_CGGC_Global_Value_Chain_GVC_Analysis_Primer_2nd_Ed_2016.pdf.
Gereffi, G., Humphrey, J., & Sturgeon, T. (2005). The governance of global value chains. Review of International Political Economy, 12(1), 78–104.
Gehring, T., & Kerler, M. (2008). Institutional stimulation of deliberative—Decision-making: division of labour, deliberative legitimacy and technical regulation in the European single market. Journal of Common Market Studies, 46(5), 1001–1023.
Ghannam, A. (2016). Business integration unit (BIU) adapted for industrial global value chain on the web. Journal of Electrical Systems and Information Technology, 3(1), 127–140.
Inomata, S. (2017). Analytical frameworks for global value chains: An overview. Global value chain development report 2017 “measuring and analyzing the impact of GVCs on economic development” (chapter 1, pp. 15–28). International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank. https://www.wto.org/english/res_e/booksp_e/gvcs_report_2017.pdf.
Liepiņa, R., Lapiņa, I., & Mazais, J. (2013). Improvement of conformity assessment system: technical harmonization adjustment. In Proceedings of the 17th World Multi-Conference on Systemics, Cybernetics and Informatics (Vol. II, pp. 37–42). Orlando, Florida, USA.
Lohbeck, D. (1998). CE marking handbook. A practical approach to global safety certification. Chapter 1—Europe’s Approach to Total Harmonization. Elsevier Inc.
Maciejewski, M. (2017). Free movement of goods. Fact sheets on the European Union—2017 (pp. 1–5). Available at: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/ftu/pdf/en/FTU_3.1.2.pdf.
Masserlin, P. (2011). The European Union single market in goods: Between mutual recognition and harmonisation. Australian Journal of International Affairs, 65(4), 410–435.
Mishra, R., Pundir, A. K., & Ganapathy, L. (2014). Manufacturing flexibility research: A review of literature and agenda for future research. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 15(2), 101–112.
Nicolaides, P. (1998). The role of member states as rule-makers in the European Union. Intereconomics, 33(1), 3–10.
Pelkmans, J. (1987). The new approach to technical harmonization and standardization. Journal of Common Market Studies, 25(3), 249–269.
Pelkmans, J. (2006). European industrial policy. International Handbook on Industrial Policy, 45–78.
Playle, M. (2011). CE marking—The essential requirements. In C. Dale & T. Anderson (Eds.), Advances in systems safety (pp. 251–271). London: Springer.
Poncibò, C. (2007). Private certification schemes as consumer protection: A viable supplement to regulation in Europe? International Journal of Consumer Studies, 31(6), 656–661.
Ruževičius, J. (2008). The study of quality certification system of Lithuania. Engineering Economics, 2(57), 78–84.
Saam, N., & Sumpter, D. (2008). EU institutional reforms. How do member states reach a decision? Journal of Policy Modeling, 30(1), 71–86.
Sheps, I. (2009). From product quality to organization quality. In Proceedings of Fifth International Working Conference “Total Quality Management—Advanced and Intelligent Approaches” (pp. 41–46). Belgrade.
Stephenson, S. M. (1997). Standards, conformity assessment and developing countries. World Bank Research Working Paper No. 1826.
Sushil. (2012). Multiple perspectives of flexible systems management. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 13(1), 1–2.
Tippman, C. (2013). The national quality infrastructure, policy brief “the innovation policy platform” (pp. 1–12). https://innovationpolicyplatform.org/sites/default/files/rdf_imported_documents/TheNationalQualityInfrastructure.pdf.
Tricker, R. (2000). CE conformity marking and new approach directives. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann Linacre House.
Vaquier, C., Legrand, D., & Caldani, C. (2009). Qualification Opérationnelle du Systèmein Formatique d’un Depot de Sanget de ses Échanges Dedonnées. Transfusion Clinique et Biologique, 16(2), 245–252.
Yin, X., Dong, C., & Liu, C. (2017). Global value chain restructuring in the trade of knocked down products. Transactions of FAMENA, 41(1), 91–98.
Zhou, R. (2013). Research on vertical structure evolution of global value chain & enterprise innovation. In 2013 International Conference on Management Science and Engineering 20th Annual Conference Proceedings Management Science and Engineering (ICMSE) (pp. 1848–1853).
Zlámalová, J. (2010). Chosen influences of “revision of new approach”. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, 291–296.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Liepiņa, R., Lapiņa, I., Mazais, J. (2018). Sustainability in Conformity Assessment: Flexibility of Technical Harmonization. In: Connell, J., Agarwal, R., Sushil, Dhir, S. (eds) Global Value Chains, Flexibility and Sustainability. Flexible Systems Management. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-8929-9_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-8929-9_16
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-8928-2
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-8929-9
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)