Skip to main content

A Framework for Analysis Learning Pattern Toward Online Forum in Programming Course

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover New Media for Educational Change

Part of the book series: Educational Communications and Technology Yearbook ((ECTY))

  • 742 Accesses

Abstract

With the online learning platform used widely, learners’ behavior in online system should be an important element to assess the achievement and reflect the learning process. This paper proposes an approach to analyze the students’ behavior in Moodle’s online forum by a two-dimensional framework. One dimension is toward the interaction activities among peers’ posts in online forum. Another dimension is described by word clouds related to learning contents of the posts. The students’ learning behavior patterns are analyzed and described. It found that there is high correlation between the participating in online forum and achievement. The framework is helpful to design the architecture of automatically recommended system and adaptive learning system in the future.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Berland, M., Baker, R. S., & Blikstein, P. (2014). Educational data mining and learning analytics: Applications to constructionist research. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 19(1–2), 205–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bienkowski, M., Feng, M., & Means, B. (2012). Enhancing teaching and learning through educational data mining and learning analytics: An issue brief. Available: https://tech.ed.gov/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/edm-la-brief.pdf.

  • Blikstein, P., Worsley, M., Piech, C., Sahami, M., Cooper, S., & Koller, D. (2014). Programming pluralism: Using learning analytics to detect patterns in the learning of computer programming. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 23(4), 561–599.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • da Silveira Espindola, L., & Silveira, M. S. (2017). Self-expression and discourse continuity in a multilevel EUD environment: The case of Moodle. Journal of Visual Languages & Computing, 40, 36–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fidalgo-Blanco, Á., Sein-Echaluce, M. L., García-Peñalvo, F. J., & Conde, M. Á. (2015). Using learning analytics to improve teamwork assessment. Computers in Human Behavior, 47, 149–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Losh, E. (Ed.). (2017). MOOCs and their afterlives: Experiments in scale and access in higher education. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meza-Fernández, S., & Sepúlveda-Sariego, A. (2017). Representational model on Moodle’s activity: Learning styles and navigation strategies. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 14(1), 14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Serrano-Laguna, Á., Torrente, J., Moreno-Ger, P., & Fernández-Manjón, B. (2012). Tracing a little for big improvements: Application of learning analytics and videogames for student assessment. Procedia Computer Science, 15, 203–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siemens, G. (2011). Learning and knowledge analytics: Knewton – The future of education? Retrieved from: http://www.learninganalytics.net/?p=126.

  • Stich, A. E., & Reeves, T. D. (2017). Massive open online courses and underserved students in the United States. The Internet and Higher Education, 32, 58–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, S. (2016). Future ready learning: Reimagining the role of technology in education. 2016 National Education Technology Plan. Office of Educational Technology, US Department of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vu, P., Fredrickson, S., & Moore, C. (Eds.). (2016). Handbook of research on innovative pedagogies and technologies for online learning in higher education. Hershey, PA: IGI Global.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wise, A. F., Cui, Y., Jin, W., & Vytasek, J. (2017). Mining for gold: Identifying content-related MOOC discussion threads across domains through linguistic modeling. The Internet and Higher Education, 32, 11–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

This study is supported by the Undergraduate Students Research Fund of East China University of Science and Technology (ECUST).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Qingchun Hu or Yong Huang .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Hu, Q., Huang, Y. (2018). A Framework for Analysis Learning Pattern Toward Online Forum in Programming Course. In: Deng, L., Ma, W., Fong, C. (eds) New Media for Educational Change. Educational Communications and Technology Yearbook. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-8896-4_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-8896-4_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-8895-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-8896-4

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics