Class Discriminator-Based EMG Classification Approach for Detection of Neuromuscular Diseases Using Discriminator-Dependent Decision Rule (D3R) Approach

  • Avik Bhattacharya
  • Purbanka Pahari
  • Piyali Basak
  • Anasua Sarkar
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 727)

Abstract

Classification of EMG signals is essential for diagnosis of motor neuron diseases like neuropathy and myopathy. Although a number of strategies have been implemented for classification, none of them are efficient enough to be implemented in clinical environment. In the present study, we use ensemble approach of support vector machines for classification of three classes (normal, myopathic and neuropathic) of clinical electromyogram (EMG). Our proposed approach uses time and time–frequency features extracted from EMG signals. By employing two types of feature set for same class discriminators, we are able to select the best feature set-discriminator pairs. The decision made by each selected classifier is used to generate the final class for an input EMG signal through majority voting. Our proposed method yields higher accuracy of 94.67% over 89.67% for multiclass SVM classifier.

Keywords

Ensemble framework Discriminator-dependent decision rule Electromyogram MUAP classification 

References

  1. 1.
    Merletti R, Parker P (2004) Electromyography: physiology, engineering, and non-invasive applications. Wiley, Hobokken, NJCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Subasi A (2012) Classification of EMG signals using combined features and soft computing techniques. Appl Soft Comput 12:2188–2198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Subasi A (2013) Classification of EMG signals using PSO optimized SVM for diagnosis of neuromuscular disorders. Comput Biol Med 43:576–586CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kamali T, Boostani R, Parsaei H (2014) a multi-classifier approach to MUAP classification for diagnosis of neuromuscular disorders. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehab Eng 22(1), 191–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hamilton WA, Stashuk DW (2005) Physiologically based simulation of clinical EMG signals [dataset S003]. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 52, 171–183. www.emglab.net
  6. 6.
    Elamvazuthi I, Duy HXN, Ali Z, Su WS, Khan A, Parasuraman S (2015) Electromyography (EMG) based classification of neuromuscular disorders using multi-layer perceptron. Procedia Comput Sci 76:223–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Phinyomark A, Phukpattaranont P, Limsakul C (2012) Feature reduction and selection for EMG signal classification. Expert Syst Appl 39:7420–7431CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Akansu Ali N, Haddad Richard A (1992) Multiresolution signal decomposition: transforms, subbands, and wavelets. Academic Press, Boston, MAMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cortes C, Vapnik V (1995) Support-vector networks. Mach Learn 20(3):273–297MATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Avik Bhattacharya
    • 1
  • Purbanka Pahari
    • 1
  • Piyali Basak
    • 1
  • Anasua Sarkar
    • 2
  1. 1.School of Bioscience and EngineeringJadavpur UniversityKolkataIndia
  2. 2.Computer Science and Engineering DepartmentJadavpur UniversityKolkataIndia

Personalised recommendations