Scaffolding Instruction of Chinese Essay Writing with Assessment as Learning

Chapter

Abstract

This article shares ideas of how to teach writing through activities based on constructivism and scaffolding. The findings suggested that there is little relation between teacher’s feedback and students’ writing improvement. Instead, the relation is found between the numbers of communication seeking feedback the students send out.

References

  1. Berg, E. C. (1999). The effects of trained peer response on ESL students’ revision types and writing quality. Journal of Second Language Writing, 8(3), 215–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bransford, J., Brown, A., & Cocking, R. (2000). How People Learn: Brain, Mind, and Experience & School. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  3. Chang, K., Sung, Y., & Chen, I. (2002). The effect of concept mapping to enhance text comprehension and summarization. The Journal of Experimental Education, 71(1), 5–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Connor, U., & Asenavage, K. (1994). Peer response groups in ESL writing classes: How much impact on revision? Journal of Second Language Writing, 3(3), 257–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Davies, A., Pantzopoulos, K., & Gray, K. (2011). Emphasising assessment ‘as’ learning by assessing wiki writing assignments collaboratively and publicly online. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 27(5), 798–812.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Earl, L. (2003). Assessment of learning, for learning and as learning. In Assessment as learning: Using classroom assessment to maximise student learning. Thousand oaks, CA: Corwin Press.Google Scholar
  7. Earl, L., & Katz, S. (2006). Rethinking classroom assessment with purpose in mind. Assessment for learning, assessment as learning, assessment of learning. In Western and Northern Canadian Protocol for Collaboration in Education (WNCP). Retrieved from https://www.wncp.ca/media/40539/rethink.pdf on March 10, 2015.
  8. Hall, A. H., & Grisham-Brown, J. (2011). Writing development over time: Examining preservice teachers’ attitudes and beliefs about writing. Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education, 32, 148–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hattie, J. (1999). Influence on student learning. Professor of Education Inauguarl Lecture. New Zealand: University of Auckland.Google Scholar
  10. Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. London, England: Routledge.Google Scholar
  11. Hatton, N., & Smith, D. (1995). Reflection in teacher education: Towards definition and implementation. Teaching and Teacher Education, 11(1), 33–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hedge, T. (2011). Teaching and learning in the language classroom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Hyland, K. (1990). Providing productive feedback. ELT Journal, 44(4), 279–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hyland, K. (2003). Second language writing. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Johns, A. (2009). The future of second language instruction. Paper presented at the symposium on second language writing.Google Scholar
  16. Kirkwood, A., & Price, L. (2008). Assessment and student learning: A fundamental relationship and the role of information and communication technologies. Open Learning: The Journal of Open and Distance Learning, 23(1), 5–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lee, I. (2013). Becoming a writing teacher: Using “identity” as an analytic lens to understand EFL writing teachers’ development. Journal of Second Language Writing, 22, 330–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Liang, R. L. (2000). The relationship between Singapore students’ Chinese vocabulary and reading ability with their attitudes and Chinese learning achievement. In H. G. Zhang (Ed.), New trends in teaching Chinese (pp. 38–52). ILEC: Hong Kong.Google Scholar
  19. Lundstrom, K., & Baker, W. (2009). To give is better than to receive: The benefits of peer review to the reviewer’s own writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 18, 30–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Marcangelo, C., Cartney, P., & Barnes, C. (2010). The opportunities and challenges of self, peer and group assessment. In M. Hammick & C. Reid (Eds.), Contemporary issues in assessment in health sciences and practice education. (pp. 50–69). (Higher Education Academy Assessment Occasional Papers). York: UK Higher Education Academy.Google Scholar
  21. Miller, G. A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63, 81–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ministry of Education. (2011). Chinese language syllabus 2011, Curriculum planning and development division. Singapore: Ministry of Education.Google Scholar
  23. Mother Tongue Languages Review Committee. (2011). Nurturing active learners and proficient users, mother tongue languages review committee report. Singapore: MOE. Retrieved from http://www.moe.gov.sg/media/press/files/2011/mtl-review-report-2010.pdf on March 7, 2014.
  24. Murray, D. (1972). Teach writing as a process not product. In R. Graves (Ed.), Rhetoric and composition: A sourcebook for teachers and writers (pp. 89–92). Upper Montclair, NJ: Boynton/Cook.Google Scholar
  25. Murray, D. (1985). A writer teaches writing (2nd ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  26. Olson, J., & Platt, J. (2000). The instructional cycle. Teaching children and adolescents with special needs (pp. 170–197). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.Google Scholar
  27. Paas, F., Renkl, A., & Sweller, J. (2003). Cognitive load theory and instructional design: Recent developments. Educational psychologist, 38(1), 1–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Paas, F., Renkl, A., & Sweller, J. (2004). Cognitive load theory: Instructional implications of the interaction between information structures and cognitive architecture. Instructional Science, 32(1), 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Palincsar, A., & Brown, A. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1(2), 117–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Paulus, T. M. (1999). The effect of peer and teacher feedback on student writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 8(3), 265–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Raymond, E. (2000). Cognitive characteristics. Learners with mild disabilities (pp. 169–201). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon, A Pearson Education Company.Google Scholar
  32. Rollinson, P. (2005). Using peer feedback in the ESL writing class. ELT Journal, 59(1), 23–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Soh, K. C. (2010). What are the chances of success for my project? and, what if it was already done? Using Meta-Analyzed Effect Sizes to Inform Project Decision-Making. Educational Research Journal, 25(1), 13–25.Google Scholar
  34. Straub, R. (2000). The students, the text and the classroom context: a case study of student response. Assessing Writing, 7, 23–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Stiggins, R. J. (2002). Assessment crisis: The absence of assessment for learning. Phi Delta Kappan, 83(10), 758–765.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12, 257–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Sweller, J. (1999). Instructional Design in Technical Areas, (Camberwell. Victoria, Australia: Australian Council for Educational Research.Google Scholar
  38. Sweller, J., Van Merrienboer, J. J., & Paas, F. G. (1998). Cognitive architecture and instructional design. Educational psychology review, 10(3), 251–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Tsui, A. B. M., & Ng, M. (2000). Do secondary L2 writers benefit from peer comments? Journal of Second Language Writing, 9(2), 147–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Villamil, O. S., & De Guerrero, M. (1998). Assessing the impact of peer revision on L2 writing. Applied Linguistics, 19(4), 491–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Wood, D., Bruner, J., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem-solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17(2), 89–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Zamel, V. (1982). Writing: The process of discovering meaning. TESOL Quarterly, 16, 195–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Zhang, S. (1995). Reexamining the affective advantage of peer feedback in the ESL writing class. Journal of Second Language Writing, 4(3), 209–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 沈淑华. (2008). 中文网志写作对提升新加坡中学生写作能力与态度之成效研究. 博士论文,香港大学,香港.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Singapore Centre for Chinese LanguageNanyang Technological UniversitySingaporeSingapore

Personalised recommendations