Abstract
Software quality is a complex term. Various researchers have various different views for defining it. One common point in all is that quality is required and is indispensable. It should not only be able to meet the customer requirements but should exceed it. Customers not only mean the external customers but the internal ones too. Performance efficiency characteristic is one of the vital software quality characteristics. If we improve the performance efficiency, then it will definitely have a positive effect on the software quality. In this paper, we have identified various sub-characteristics that can affect the performance efficiency of the software and proposed a performance efficiency model. We assessed the performance efficiency of the software systems by using one of the multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) methods, namely analytical hierarchy process (AHP). Results suggest that the proposed model is consistent and may be used for comparing the software system.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Pressman, R.S.: Software Engineering: A Practitioner’s Approach, 5th edn. Mc Graw Hill, New York (2005)
ISO/IEC 2010; ISO/IEC 25010: Systems & software engineering—system and software quality requirements and evaluation (SQuaRE)—system and software quality models (2010)
Boehm, B., et al.: Quantitative evaluation of software quality. In: IEEE International Conference on Software Engineering, pp. 592–605 (1976)
Sommerville, Ian (2004). Software Engineering (Seventh ed.). Pearson. pp. 12–13. ISBN 0–321-21026-3
McCall, J.A., Richards, P.K., Walters, G.F.: Factors in Software Quality, vols. I, II, and III. US Rome Air Development Center Reports. US Department of Commerce; USA (1977)
ISO 2001; ISO/IEC 9126-1: Software Engineering—Product Quality—Part 1: Quality Model. International Organisation for Standardisation, Geneva Switzerland (2001)
Kumar, A.: Analysis & design of matrices for aspect oriented systems. Ph.D. Thesis, Thapar University (2010)
Saaty, T.L.: Analytic Hierarchy Process. Mc Graw Hill (1980)
Kaur, A., Grover, P.S., Dixit, A.: Quantitative evaluation of proposed maintainability model using AHP method. In: 2nd International Conference on computing for sustainable global development, pp. 8.159–8.163 (2015)
Kaur, A., Grover, P.S., Dixit, A.: An improved model to estimate quality of the software product. YMCAUST Int. J. Res. 1(2), 01–06 (2013)
Kaur, A., Grover, P.S., Dixit, A.: Analysis of quality attribute and metrics of various software development methodologies. In: International Conference on Advancements in Computer Applications and Software Engineering, pp. 05–10 (2012)
Grady, R., et al.: Software Metrics: Establishing a Company-Wide Program, p. 159. Prentice Hall (1987)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Kaur, A., Grover, P.S., Dixit, A. (2019). Performance Efficiency Assessment for Software Systems. In: Hoda, M., Chauhan, N., Quadri, S., Srivastava, P. (eds) Software Engineering. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 731. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-8848-3_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-8848-3_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-8847-6
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-8848-3
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)