Skip to main content

From Response to Responsibility: An Academe–Industry Partnership on Solid Waste Management in the Philippines

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Disaster Risk Reduction
  • 726 Accesses

Abstract

By the late 1980s and early 1990s, a shift in environmental governance began to focus on advocates for effective environmental management by looking into communities and local institutions as important actors to involve in the process of environmental governance. There emerged a new view in environmental governance by pinpointing three (3) social actors, the states, markets and the civil society (Lemos and Agrawal in Annual Review of Environment and Resources 31: 297–325, 2006). Taking the cue from said representation leads to an examination of environmental governance by this author, in an attempt to take an in-depth look on the roles, participation, and accountability of non-state actors in the implementation of the solid waste management program. The paper is a portion of the author’s dissertation project. Further, the paper took a look also into the trajectory of environmental governance, the roles and the specific tasks particularly in the performance of private sector in its pursuit of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR). Citing a specific example for the research, the author chose as a case study, Toyota Auto Parts Incorporated and the different schools in implementation of solid waste management in the City of Santa Rosa, Province of Laguna in the Philippines which explored a least studied partnership known as the Social–Private Partnerships (SPP). Making this study unique as it tackled the actual participation of non-state actors such as the private corporations, academic institutions, and industries that are engaged in solid waste management partnerships. The data were collected using interview, focus group discussion and secondary data analysis to determine the strengths and weaknesses of different partnership arrangements in the implementation of Solid Waste Management (SWM) in the City of Santa Rosa. The paper concludes that successful environmental governance requires improved incentive mechanism and accountability measures specially in partnership arrangements among non-state actors. The paper makes recommendations for improvements of partnerships in environmental governance, particularly in the area of law, policy, education, and research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  • Agrawal, A., and Lemos, Maria Carmen. (2007). “A Greener Revolution in the Making”. Environment 49(5): 36–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Behn, R. (2001). Rethinking Democratic Accountability. Brooking Institution Press, p. 317.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, L., and Moore, M. (2001). “Accountability and Startegy and International Non-Governmental Organization”. Hauser Center for Non-Profit Organization. Working Paper 7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clapp, J. (2005, August). “Global Environmental Governance for Corporate Responsibility and Accountability”. Global Environmnetal Politics 5(3): 23–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fry, R. (1995). Accountability in Organizational Life: Problem or Opportunity for Non-profits. Wiley Periodicals Inc.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laratta, R. (2009). “Autonomy and Accountability in Social Services Nonprofits: Japan and UK”. Social Enterprise Journal 5(3): 259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lemos, M. C., and Agrawal, A. (2006). “Environmental Governance”. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 31: 297–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lemos, M. C., and Oliveira, J. L. F. (2004). “Can Water Reform Survive Politics? Institutional Change and River Basin Management in Ceara, Northern Brazil”. World Development 32(12): 2121–2137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Logo, P. B. (2003). The Decentralized Forestry Taxation System in Cameroon: Local Management and State Logic. Environmental Governance in Africa. Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naidoo, K. (2003). “Civil Society Accountability: Who Guards the Guardians-GDRC”. https://www.gdrciorg/ngo/accountability/ngo-accountability.pdf.

  • Najam, A. (1996, December). “NGO Accountability: A Conceptual Framework”. Development Policy Review.

    Google Scholar 

  • Przeworski, A., Stokes, S., and Manin, B. (1999). Democracy, Accountability and Representation. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Republic Act 7160. The Local Government Code of 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • Republic Act 9003. Ecological Solid Waste Management Act of 2000.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marlon de Luna Era .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Era, M.d. (2019). From Response to Responsibility: An Academe–Industry Partnership on Solid Waste Management in the Philippines. In: Zutshi, B., Ahmad, A., Srungarapati, A.B. (eds) Disaster Risk Reduction. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-8845-2_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-8845-2_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-8844-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-8845-2

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics