Abstract
Information and Communication Technology (ICT) is seen as a way to enhance learning (e.g. Koehler and Mishra CITE 9:60–70, 2009; Rada et al. 1996; Scott 1996), especially in geography (Nguyen et al. 2008; Razikin et al. 2009; Goh et al. 2012). “There is no escaping the web of information technology , and preparing our children to deal with the myriad aspects of this innovation is a task we cannot ignore” (Cheah 1997, p. 140). Some advantages of using ICT for learning include the allowance for self-paced learning, visualization facilitated learning, multi-media learning, constantly updated materials, production of new materials, assessments tailored based on learners’ progress and the resource-rich nature of materials from sources such as the Internet. Indeed, learning arises from a constructive process of reflection on the material provided and interacting with it (Farnham-Diggory 1990). There is “growing demand for a 21st century that is independent of time and space, oriented toward goals and outcomes, centered in the student/learner, geared to active, hands-on learning and [the ability] to accommodate differences in skills and language” (Aaggarwal and Bento 2000, p. 4). The authors will provide a conceptual approach to understand how learning geography can be enhanced with technology. Fundamentally, the question that helps us frame our understanding of ICT in geography learning should be “How does ICT help students learn geography better?”. Using ICT for learning geography can be understood in terms of how ICT can be used more efficiently, and how to encourage students to learn beyond facts and analyse and apply what they have learnt. With the rise of social media, there is also vast potential for students to curate information and produce knowledge . How then do we develop strategies to ensure that the exponential growth in information is not based on parochial individual naïve theories? Geography as a school subject, the authors argue, engages key affordances of using ICT for teaching and learning. But more importantly, ICT is just a tool and how a teacher chooses the mode of technology , sequence topics, design resources and even assess student learning will be determined by the knowledge and skills required to engage the subject, and in this case, geography.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Aggarwal, A., & Bento, R. (2000). Web-based education. In A. Aggarwal (Ed.), Web-based learning and teaching technologies: Opportunities and challenges (pp. 2–16). Hershey PA: Idea Group.
Balduini, M., Celino, I., Dell’Aglio, D., Della Valle, E., Huang, Y., Lee, T., et al. (2012). BOTTARI: An augmented reality application to deliver personalized and location-based recommendations by continuous analysis of social media streams. Web Semantics: Science, Services and Agents on the World Wide Web, 16, 33–41.
Barron, B., & Darling-Hammond, L. (2008). Teaching for meaningful learning: A review of research on inquiry-based and cooperative learning. Book Excerpt. George Lucas Educational Foundation.
Bartoschek, T., & Keßler, C. (2013). VGI in education: From K-12 to graduate studies. In Crowdsourcing Geographic Knowledge (pp. 341–360). Springer, Dordrecht.
Bednarz, R. S., & Bednarz, S. W. (2004). Geography : The glass is half full and it’s getting fuller. The Professional Geographer, 56(1), 22–27.
Bednarz, S. W. (2004). Geographic systems: A tool to support and environmental ? GeoJournal, 60(2), 191–199.
Cheah, Y. M. (1997). Shaping the classrooms of tomorrow: Lessons from the past. In J. Tan, S. Gopinathan, & W.K. Ho (Eds.), Education in Singapore, A book of readings (pp. 129–144). Singapore: Prentice Hall.
Chen, M., Lin, H., Hu, M., He, L., & Zhang, C. (2013). Real-geographic-scenario-based virtual social environments: Integrating geography with social research. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 40(6), 1103–1121. https://doi.org/10.1068/b38160.
Earnshaw, R. A. (2014). Virtual reality systems. Elsevier Science.
Farnham-Diggory, S. (1990). Schooling, the development child. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Foresman, C. (2016, September 11). How Star Trek artists imagined the iPad… nearly 30 years ago. Retrieved September 30, 2016, from Ars Technica: http://arstechnica.com/apple/2016/09/how-star-trek-artists-imagined-the-ipad-23-years-ago/.
Gilbert, I. (2010). Why do I need a teacher when I’ve got google. London: Routledge.
Goh, D., Razikin, K., Lee, C., Lim, E., Chatterjea, K., & Chang, C. (2012). Evaluating the use of a mobile annotation system for geography education. The Electronic Library, 30(5), 589–607.
Goodchild, M. (2007). Citizens as sensors: The world of volunteered geography. GeoJournal, 69(4), 211–221.
Hannon, V., Patton, A., & Temperley, J. (2011). Developing an innovation ecosystem for education. Cisco White Paper December.
International Geographic Union—Commission on Geographical Education. (1992). International Charter on Geographical Education. Retrieved 2016, from International Geographic Union—Commission on Geographical Education: http://www.igu-cge.org/charter-translations/1.%20English.pdf
Koehler, M., & Mishra, P. (2009). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge? CITE, 9 (1), 60–70.
Lambert, D., & Hopkin, J. (2014). A possibilist analysis of the national curriculum in England. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 23(1), 64–78.
Li, Y., Guo, A., Lee, J. A., & Negara, G. P. K. (2013). A platform on the cloud for self-creation of interactive trails. International Journal of Mobile Learning and Organisation, 7(1), 66–80.
Meng, L., & Reichenbacher, T. (2005). Map-based services. In L. Meng, A. Zipf, & T. Reichenbacher (Eds.), Map-based mobile services: Theories, methods and implementations (pp. 1–10): Springer.
Young, M., & Muller, J. (2010). Three educational scenarios for the future: Lessons from the sociology of knowledge. European Journal of Education, 45(1), 11–27.
Nguyen, Q. K. (2008). TagNSearch: Searching and navigating geo-referenced collections of photographs. International Conference on Theory and Practice of Digital Libraries (pp. 62–73). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
O’Reilly, T. (2007). What is Web 2.0: Design patterns and business models for the next generation of software. Communications & Strategies, (1), 17.
Parkinson, A. (2013). How has technology impacted on the teaching of geography and geography teachers. Debates in Geographical Education, 193–205.
Rada, R., Rimpau, J., Bowman, C., Gordon, J., Henderson, T., & Sansom, T. (1996). World wide web activity and the university. Educational Technology Research and Development, 36(5), 49–51.
Razikin, K., Goh, D. H. L., Theng, Y. L., Nguyen, Q. M., Kim, T. N. Q., et al. (2009, October). Sharing multimedia annotations to support inquiry-based learning using MobiTOP. In International Conference on Active Media Technology (pp. 171–182). Berlin Heidelberg: Springer.
Reed, S., Kreylos, O., Hsi, S., Kellogg, L., Schladow, G., Yikilmaz, M., et al. (2014). Shaping watersheds exhibit: An interactive, augmented reality sandbox for advancing earth science. Paper presented at the AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts.
Scott B. D. (1996) Teaching the net: Innovative techniques in Internet training. Paper presented at the Annual Computers in Libraries Conference (Washington DC, February 1996).
Shulman, L. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14.
Sui, D. Z., & Bednarz, R. S. (1999). The message is the medium: Geographic in the age of the Internet. Journal of Geography, 98(3), 93–99.
Woods, T. L., Reed, S., Hsi, S., Woods, J. A., & Woods, M. R. (2016). Pilot study using the augmented reality sandbox to teach topographic maps and surficial processes in introductory geology labs. Journal of Geoscience Education, 64(3), 199–214.
Wu, B. S. (2013). Developing an evaluation framework of spatial understanding through GIS analysis of Volunteered Geographic Information (VGI). Review of International Geographical Education Online, 3(2).
Yuen, S., Yaoyuneyong, G., & Johnson, E. (2011). Augmented reality: An overview and five directions for AR in education. Journal of Educational Technology Development and Exchange, 4(1), 119–140.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Chang, CH., Wu, B.S. (2018). Teaching Geography with Technology—A Critical Commentary. In: Chang, CH., Wu, B., Seow, T., Irvine, K. (eds) Learning Geography Beyond the Traditional Classroom. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-8705-9_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-8705-9_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-8704-2
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-8705-9
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)