Skip to main content

Evaluation of Robot Appearance Using a Brain Science Technique

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 746 Accesses

Abstract

We evaluate the humanlike-ness of humanoid robots using electroencephalography (EEG). As the activity of the human mirror-neuron system (MNS) is believed to reflect the humanlike-ness of observed agents, we compare the MNS activity of 17 participants while observing certain actions performed by a human, an extremely humanlike android, and a machine-like humanoid. We find the MNS to be significantly activated only when the participants observe actions performed by the human. Despite the participants’ rating of the android appearance as more humanlike than that of the robot, the MNS activity corresponding to each of the three agents does not differ. These findings suggest that appearance does not crucially affect MNS activity, and that factors such as motion should be targeted for improving the humanlike-ness of humanoid robots.

This chapter is a modified version of a previously published paper [1], edited to be comprehensive and fit with the context of this book.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Matsuda, G., K. Hiraki, and H. Ishiguro. 2010. Evaluation of robot appearance by using a brain science technique. In Proceedings of 2010 IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems (IROS 2010) workshop: Human-robot symbiosis: Synergistic creation of human-robot relationships.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Rizzolatti, G., L. Fogassi, and V. Gallese. 2001. Neurophysiological mechanisms underlying the understanding and imitation of action. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2: 661–670.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Pineda, J.A. 2005. The functional significance of mu rhythms: translating “seeing” and “hearing” into “doing”. Brain Research Reviews 50: 57–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Chikaraishi, T., T. Minato, and H. Ishiguro. 2008. Development of an android system integrated with sensor networks. In Proceedings of 2008 IEEE international conference intelligent robots and systems (IROS 2008), Nice, Sep. 2008, 326–333.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ulloa, E.R., and J.A. Pineda. 2007. Recognition of point-light biological motion: mu rhythms and mirror neuron activity. Behavioural Brain Research 183: 188–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by KAKENHI (20220002 and 18200018).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kazuo Hiraki .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Matsuda, G., Hiraki, K., Ishiguro, H. (2018). Evaluation of Robot Appearance Using a Brain Science Technique. In: Ishiguro, H., Dalla Libera, F. (eds) Geminoid Studies. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-8702-8_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-8702-8_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-8701-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-8702-8

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics