Abstract
Young children are capable of understanding ideas that educators had once thought to be too complex for these ages. Children start to engage in creative design and develop engineering thinking at early ages as they play, create, solve puzzles, and ask questions. Just as it is important to highlight these activities as early engineering practices , it is important to use assessment practices necessary to support further development of engineering thinking . In this chapter, we lay the foundation for assessment of young children’s engineering thinking through discussion of current research on early engineering thinking and effective approaches to assessment as we outline engineering design competencies for young learners. We also present the Mosaic framework , a model that guides assessment practices in engineering and provides practical strategies that are necessary to maintain complexity while teaching and assessing engineering design to young children. We urge the community toward a multi-faceted view of assessment that targets student learning evidence and growth supported by curriculum design, and teacher professional development , along with assessment tools and strategies.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Anthony, G., McLachlan, C., & Poh, R. L. F. (2015). Narrative assessment: Making mathematics learning visible in early childhood settings. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 27(3), 385–400. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-015-0142-2.
Asunda, P. A., & Hill, R. B. (2007). Critical features of engineering design in technology education. Journal of Industrial Teacher Education, 44(1). Retrieved from http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/ejournals/JITE/v44n1/asunda.html.
Atman, C., & Adams, R. (2007). Engineering design processes: A comparison of students and expert practitioners. Journal of Engineering Education, 96(4), 359–379. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2007.tb00945.x.
Atman, C., Cardella, M. E., Turns, J., & Adams, R. (2005). A comparison of freshman and senior engineering design processes: An in depth follow-up study. Design Studies, 26(4), 325–357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2004.09.005.
Chittenden, E., & Jones, J. (February, 1998). Science assessment in early childhood programs. Paper Presented at the Forum on Early Childhood, Science, Mathematics, and Technology Education, Washington, DC. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED416990.
Crismond, D. P., & Adams, R. S. (2012). The informed design teaching and learning matrix. Journal of Engineering Education, 101(4), 738–797. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2012.tb01127.x.
Daly, S. R., Adams, R. S., & Bodner, G. M. (2012). What does it mean to design? A qualitative investigation of design professionals’ experiences. Journal of Engineering Education, 101(2), 187–219. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2012.tb00048.x.
Douglas, K., Moore, T., & Adams, R. (2016). Core engineering design competencies. Purdue University Research Repository. https://doi.org/10.4231/R7B56GQZ.
ETA hand2mind. (2013). Hands-On Standards® STEM in Action Ron’s Ramp Adventure. [Kit]. Vernon Hills, IL: ETA hand2mind.
Gainsburg, J. (2006). The mathematical modeling of structural engineers. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 8(1), 3–36. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327833mtl0801_2.
Grisham-Brown, J., Hallam, R., & Brookshire, R. (2006). Using authentic assessment to evidence children’s progress toward early learning standards. Early Childhood Education Journal, 34(1), 45–51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-006-0106-y.
Groves, J., Abts, L., & Goldberg, G. (2014). Using an engineering design process portfolio scoring rubric to structure online high school engineering education. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 19(8), 2. Retrieved from http://pareonline.net/getvn.asp?v=19&n=8.
Hsu, M.-C., Cardella, M. E., & Purzer, Ş. (2010, March). Elementary students’ learning progressions and prior knowledge on engineering design process. Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Philadelphia, PA.
Hsu, M.-C., Cardella, M. E., & Purzer, Ş. (2012). Elementary students’ engineering design process knowledge: Instrument development and pilot test. In Proceedings of the 119th ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, San Antonio, TX.
Hunter, L., & Sonter, L. (2011). Wondering why? Exploring scientific thinking in an emergent co-constructed curriculum. Educating Young Children, 17(1), 18–19. Retrieved from http://www.ecta.org.au/_dbase_upl/ECTA-EducatingYoungChildren-17.1-2012S.pdf#page=20.
Institute of Medicine (IOM), & National Research Council (NRC). (2015). Transforming the workforce for children birth through age 8: A unifying foundation. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. Retrieved from https://www.nap.edu/read/19401/chapter/21#498.
Jonassen, D., Strobel, J., & Lee, C. B. (2006). Everyday problem solving in engineering: Lessons for engineering educators. Journal of Engineering Education, 95(2), 139–151. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2006.tb00885.x.
Moore, T. J., Glancy, A. W., Tank, K. M., Kersten, J. A., Smith, K. A., & Stohlmann, M. S. (2014). A framework for quality K-12 engineering education: Research and development. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research, 4(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.7771/2157-9288.1069.
National Academy of Engineering & National Research Council. (2009). Engineering in K-12 education: Understanding the status and improving the prospects. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
National Association for the Education of Young Children. (2012). NAEYC standards for initial & advanced early childhood professional preparation. Retrieved from http://www.naeyc.org/files/naeyc/NAEYC%20Initial%20and%20Advanced%20Standards.pdf.
National Research Council. (2000). Eager to learn: Educating our preschoolers. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
Novel Engineering. (2016). Retrieved from http://www.novelengineering.org.
Pellegrino, J. W. (2012). Assessment of science learning: Living in interesting times. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(6), 831–841.
PictureSTEM. (2016a). Designing hamster habitats. Retrieved from http://picturestem.org/picturestem-units/first-grade-hamsters.
PictureSTEM. (2016b). Designing paper baskets. Retrieved from http://picturestem.org/picturestem-units/kindergarten-baskets.
Popham, W. J. (2010). Classroom assessment: What teachers need to know (6th ed.). NJ Pearson: Upper Saddle River.
Purzer, Ş., Duncan-Wiles, D., & Strobel, J. (2013). Cost or quality? Science & Children, 50(5), 34–39.
Purzer, Ş., & Fernandez, T. (2015, October). Teaching and assessment strategies that value innovative thinking. In Proceedings of the 2015 Frontiers in Education Conference, El Paso, TX.
Purzer, Ş., Strobel, J., & Cardella, M. E. (2014). Engineering in pre-college settings: Synthesizing research, policy, and practices. West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University Press.
Sheppard, S. D., Macatangay, K., Colby, A., & Sullivan, W. M. (2008). Educating engineers: Designing for the future of the field. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Stagnitti, K. (2014). Pretend play and literacy. Educating Young Children, 20(2), 18–21. Retrieved from http://search.informit.com.au/documentSummary;dn=588774442422469;res=IELHSS.
Stevens, R., Bransford, J., & Stevens, A. (2005). The LIFE Center’s lifelong and lifewide diagram. Retrieved from: http://life-slc.org.
Wiliam, D. (2011). Embedded formative assessment. Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Purzer, Ş., Douglas, K.A. (2018). Assessing Early Engineering Thinking and Design Competencies in the Classroom. In: English, L., Moore, T. (eds) Early Engineering Learning. Early Mathematics Learning and Development. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-8621-2_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-8621-2_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-8620-5
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-8621-2
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)