Investigating User Experience on Blended Learning

  • Intan Farahana Kamsin
  • Nurwahida Faradila Taharim
  • Nur Khairunnisha Zainal
  • Hairul Aysa Abdul Halim Sithiq
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 739)

Abstract

Traditional teaching and learning method such as teacher being the controller of the classroom and as the source of knowledge while learners act as a passive receiver is no longer an ideal method for today’s classroom settings. Instead of being a receiver, student nowadays also ought to give input in class, take charge of class activities and allow to give feedbacks, feeling as much responsible as the teachers and having fun while learning. Blended Learning is a new pedagogical approach which provides a mixed-mode learning and teaching method. The term “blended” brought the meaning of blending a multimedia tool such as text, audio, video, animation, virtual reality, edutainment and effective functions into interactive learning experience. This paper is aimed to investigate students’ experience on blended learning at one of private university in Kuala Lumpur. The objective of this research is to identify the students’ experience on blended learning towards course content, delivery media, learning outcome, interactivity and the relevancy towards the course structure. This study shall prove that blended learning is able to give a new experience and approach to the students while making teaching and learning more effective, interactive and not to forget, fun.

Keywords

User Experience Blended Learning Pedagogy 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    H. Sithiq and R. Mahmud, “Using an Edutainment Approach of a Snake and Ladder game for teaching Jawi Script.,” in International Conference on Education and Management Technology (ICEMT 2010), Cairo (2010).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    B. Ugur, B. Akkoyunlu and K. Kurbanoglu, “Students’ Opinions on Blended Learning and Its Implementation in terms of Their Learning Styles.,” Journal Education Information Technology, vol. 16, p. 5–23 (2011).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    E. Chew, D. A. Turner and N. Jones, “In Love and War: Blended Learning Theories for Computer Scientist and Educationalists.,” in Handbook of Research on Hybrid Learning Models: Advanced Tools, Technologies, and Applications., Hershey, IGI Global, 2010, pp. 1-23.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    C. R. Graham, “Blended learning systems: Definition, Current Trends, and Future Directions.,” in Handbook of Blended Learning: Global Perspectives, Local Design, California, Pfeiffer Publishing, 2012, pp. 3-21.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    K. S. Cheung, J. Lam, N. Lau and C. Shim, “A Paradigm in Instructional Design to Support Blended L.earning,” in Proceedings from the International Conference on ICT in Teaching and Learning., Sims University (2010).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    B. Means, Y. Toyama, R. Murphy, M. Bakia and K. Jones, Evaluation of Evidence-Based Practices in Online Learning: A Meta-analysis and Review of Online Learning Studies., Washington: Department of Education (2010).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    G. Saliba, L. Rankine and H. Cortez, Fundamentals of Blended Learning, Sydney: University of Western Sydney (2013).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    P. Ramsden, Learning to Teach in Higher Education, London: Routledge Falmer (2003).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    M. Oliver and K. Trigwell, “Can Blended Learning be redeemed?,” E-Learning and Digital Media, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 17-26 (2005).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    C. R. Graham, “Blended learning systems: Definition, Current Trends, and Future Directions,” in Handbook of Blended Learning: Global Perspectives and Local Design, California, Pfeiffer Publishing, 2012, pp. 3-21.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    D. Whitelock and A. Jelfs, “Journal of Educational Media Special Issue on Blended Learning,” Journal of Educational Media, vol. 28, no. 2-3, pp. 99-100 (2003).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    A. Rossett, F. Douglis and R. Frazee, “Strategies for Building Blended Learning.,” 2010. [Online]. Available: http://www.astd.org/LC/2003/0703_rossett.htm. [Accessed 20 10 2017].
  13. 13.
    S. J. McMillan, “Exploring Models of Interactivity from Multiple Research Traditions: Users, Documents, And Systems,” in Handbook of New Media, London, Sage, 2002, pp. 162-182.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    C. J. Macdonald, E. J. Stodel, L. G. Farres, K. Briethaupt and M. A. Gabriel, “The Demand-Driven Learning Model as a Standard for Web-Based Learning,” 2002. [Online]. Available: http://elearnmag.acm.org/featured.cfm?aid=609737. [Accessed 29 October 2017].
  15. 15.
    M. J. Kintu and E. Kagembe, “Blended learning effectiveness: The Relationship Between Student Characteristics, Design Features and Outcomes,” International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, vol. 14, no. 1, p. 16–39 (2017).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    N. F. Taharim, A. M. Lokman, W. A. R. Wan Mohd Isa and N. L. M. Noor, “A Relationship Model of Playful Interaction, Interaction Design, Kansei Engineering and Mobile Usability in Mobile Learning,” in Open System (ICOS), Kuching (2013).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    E. Loukis, S. Georgiou and K. Pazalo, “A Value Flow Model for The Evaluation of an E-Learning Service,” in European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS), St. Gallen (2007).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Y. Kuo, A. E. Walker, B. R. Belland and L. E. E. Schroder, “A Predictive Study of Student Satisfaction in Online Education Programs,” International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, vol. 14, no. 1, p. 16–39 (2013).Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    D. H. Lim and H. J. Kim, “Motivation and Learner Characteristics Affecting Online Learning and Learning Application,” Journal of Educational Technology Systems, vol. 31, no. 4, p. 423–439 (2003).Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    K. M. Justice and C. Zhu, “Student Characteristics and Learning Outcomes in a Blended Learning Environment Intervention in a Ugandan University,” The Electronic Journal of E-Learning, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 181-195 (2016).Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    M. Holtzblatt and N. Tschakert, “Expanding Your Accounting Classroom With Digital Video Technology,” Journal of Accounting Education, vol. 29, no. 2-3, p. 100–121 (2011).Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    T. Krasnova and M. Demeshko, “Tutor-mediated Support in Blended Learning,” in Social and Behavioral Sciences (2015).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Intan Farahana Kamsin
    • 1
  • Nurwahida Faradila Taharim
    • 1
  • Nur Khairunnisha Zainal
    • 1
  • Hairul Aysa Abdul Halim Sithiq
    • 1
  1. 1.Asia Pacific University of Technology & InnovationKuala LumpurMalaysia

Personalised recommendations