Skip to main content

Abstract

Traditional teaching and learning method such as teacher being the controller of the classroom and as the source of knowledge while learners act as a passive receiver is no longer an ideal method for today’s classroom settings. Instead of being a receiver, student nowadays also ought to give input in class, take charge of class activities and allow to give feedbacks, feeling as much responsible as the teachers and having fun while learning. Blended Learning is a new pedagogical approach which provides a mixed-mode learning and teaching method. The term “blended” brought the meaning of blending a multimedia tool such as text, audio, video, animation, virtual reality, edutainment and effective functions into interactive learning experience. This paper is aimed to investigate students’ experience on blended learning at one of private university in Kuala Lumpur. The objective of this research is to identify the students’ experience on blended learning towards course content, delivery media, learning outcome, interactivity and the relevancy towards the course structure. This study shall prove that blended learning is able to give a new experience and approach to the students while making teaching and learning more effective, interactive and not to forget, fun.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. H. Sithiq and R. Mahmud, “Using an Edutainment Approach of a Snake and Ladder game for teaching Jawi Script.,” in International Conference on Education and Management Technology (ICEMT 2010), Cairo (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  2. B. Ugur, B. Akkoyunlu and K. Kurbanoglu, “Students’ Opinions on Blended Learning and Its Implementation in terms of Their Learning Styles.,” Journal Education Information Technology, vol. 16, p. 5–23 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  3. E. Chew, D. A. Turner and N. Jones, “In Love and War: Blended Learning Theories for Computer Scientist and Educationalists.,” in Handbook of Research on Hybrid Learning Models: Advanced Tools, Technologies, and Applications., Hershey, IGI Global, 2010, pp. 1-23.

    Google Scholar 

  4. C. R. Graham, “Blended learning systems: Definition, Current Trends, and Future Directions.,” in Handbook of Blended Learning: Global Perspectives, Local Design, California, Pfeiffer Publishing, 2012, pp. 3-21.

    Google Scholar 

  5. K. S. Cheung, J. Lam, N. Lau and C. Shim, “A Paradigm in Instructional Design to Support Blended L.earning,” in Proceedings from the International Conference on ICT in Teaching and Learning., Sims University (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  6. B. Means, Y. Toyama, R. Murphy, M. Bakia and K. Jones, Evaluation of Evidence-Based Practices in Online Learning: A Meta-analysis and Review of Online Learning Studies., Washington: Department of Education (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  7. G. Saliba, L. Rankine and H. Cortez, Fundamentals of Blended Learning, Sydney: University of Western Sydney (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  8. P. Ramsden, Learning to Teach in Higher Education, London: Routledge Falmer (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  9. M. Oliver and K. Trigwell, “Can Blended Learning be redeemed?,” E-Learning and Digital Media, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 17-26 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  10. C. R. Graham, “Blended learning systems: Definition, Current Trends, and Future Directions,” in Handbook of Blended Learning: Global Perspectives and Local Design, California, Pfeiffer Publishing, 2012, pp. 3-21.

    Google Scholar 

  11. D. Whitelock and A. Jelfs, “Journal of Educational Media Special Issue on Blended Learning,” Journal of Educational Media, vol. 28, no. 2-3, pp. 99-100 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  12. A. Rossett, F. Douglis and R. Frazee, “Strategies for Building Blended Learning.,” 2010. [Online]. Available: http://www.astd.org/LC/2003/0703_rossett.htm. [Accessed 20 10 2017].

  13. S. J. McMillan, “Exploring Models of Interactivity from Multiple Research Traditions: Users, Documents, And Systems,” in Handbook of New Media, London, Sage, 2002, pp. 162-182.

    Google Scholar 

  14. C. J. Macdonald, E. J. Stodel, L. G. Farres, K. Briethaupt and M. A. Gabriel, “The Demand-Driven Learning Model as a Standard for Web-Based Learning,” 2002. [Online]. Available: http://elearnmag.acm.org/featured.cfm?aid=609737. [Accessed 29 October 2017].

  15. M. J. Kintu and E. Kagembe, “Blended learning effectiveness: The Relationship Between Student Characteristics, Design Features and Outcomes,” International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, vol. 14, no. 1, p. 16–39 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  16. N. F. Taharim, A. M. Lokman, W. A. R. Wan Mohd Isa and N. L. M. Noor, “A Relationship Model of Playful Interaction, Interaction Design, Kansei Engineering and Mobile Usability in Mobile Learning,” in Open System (ICOS), Kuching (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  17. E. Loukis, S. Georgiou and K. Pazalo, “A Value Flow Model for The Evaluation of an E-Learning Service,” in European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS), St. Gallen (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Y. Kuo, A. E. Walker, B. R. Belland and L. E. E. Schroder, “A Predictive Study of Student Satisfaction in Online Education Programs,” International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, vol. 14, no. 1, p. 16–39 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  19. D. H. Lim and H. J. Kim, “Motivation and Learner Characteristics Affecting Online Learning and Learning Application,” Journal of Educational Technology Systems, vol. 31, no. 4, p. 423–439 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  20. K. M. Justice and C. Zhu, “Student Characteristics and Learning Outcomes in a Blended Learning Environment Intervention in a Ugandan University,” The Electronic Journal of E-Learning, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 181-195 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  21. M. Holtzblatt and N. Tschakert, “Expanding Your Accounting Classroom With Digital Video Technology,” Journal of Accounting Education, vol. 29, no. 2-3, p. 100–121 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  22. T. Krasnova and M. Demeshko, “Tutor-mediated Support in Blended Learning,” in Social and Behavioral Sciences (2015).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Intan Farahana Kamsin or Hairul Aysa Abdul Halim Sithiq .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Kamsin, I.F., Taharim, N.F., Zainal, N.K., Sithiq, H.A.A.H. (2018). Investigating User Experience on Blended Learning. In: Lokman, A., Yamanaka, T., Lévy, P., Chen, K., Koyama, S. (eds) Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Kansei Engineering and Emotion Research 2018. KEER 2018. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 739. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-8612-0_84

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-8612-0_84

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-8611-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-8612-0

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics