Abstract
Traditional teaching and learning method such as teacher being the controller of the classroom and as the source of knowledge while learners act as a passive receiver is no longer an ideal method for today’s classroom settings. Instead of being a receiver, student nowadays also ought to give input in class, take charge of class activities and allow to give feedbacks, feeling as much responsible as the teachers and having fun while learning. Blended Learning is a new pedagogical approach which provides a mixed-mode learning and teaching method. The term “blended” brought the meaning of blending a multimedia tool such as text, audio, video, animation, virtual reality, edutainment and effective functions into interactive learning experience. This paper is aimed to investigate students’ experience on blended learning at one of private university in Kuala Lumpur. The objective of this research is to identify the students’ experience on blended learning towards course content, delivery media, learning outcome, interactivity and the relevancy towards the course structure. This study shall prove that blended learning is able to give a new experience and approach to the students while making teaching and learning more effective, interactive and not to forget, fun.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
H. Sithiq and R. Mahmud, “Using an Edutainment Approach of a Snake and Ladder game for teaching Jawi Script.,” in International Conference on Education and Management Technology (ICEMT 2010), Cairo (2010).
B. Ugur, B. Akkoyunlu and K. Kurbanoglu, “Students’ Opinions on Blended Learning and Its Implementation in terms of Their Learning Styles.,” Journal Education Information Technology, vol. 16, p. 5–23 (2011).
E. Chew, D. A. Turner and N. Jones, “In Love and War: Blended Learning Theories for Computer Scientist and Educationalists.,” in Handbook of Research on Hybrid Learning Models: Advanced Tools, Technologies, and Applications., Hershey, IGI Global, 2010, pp. 1-23.
C. R. Graham, “Blended learning systems: Definition, Current Trends, and Future Directions.,” in Handbook of Blended Learning: Global Perspectives, Local Design, California, Pfeiffer Publishing, 2012, pp. 3-21.
K. S. Cheung, J. Lam, N. Lau and C. Shim, “A Paradigm in Instructional Design to Support Blended L.earning,” in Proceedings from the International Conference on ICT in Teaching and Learning., Sims University (2010).
B. Means, Y. Toyama, R. Murphy, M. Bakia and K. Jones, Evaluation of Evidence-Based Practices in Online Learning: A Meta-analysis and Review of Online Learning Studies., Washington: Department of Education (2010).
G. Saliba, L. Rankine and H. Cortez, Fundamentals of Blended Learning, Sydney: University of Western Sydney (2013).
P. Ramsden, Learning to Teach in Higher Education, London: Routledge Falmer (2003).
M. Oliver and K. Trigwell, “Can Blended Learning be redeemed?,” E-Learning and Digital Media, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 17-26 (2005).
C. R. Graham, “Blended learning systems: Definition, Current Trends, and Future Directions,” in Handbook of Blended Learning: Global Perspectives and Local Design, California, Pfeiffer Publishing, 2012, pp. 3-21.
D. Whitelock and A. Jelfs, “Journal of Educational Media Special Issue on Blended Learning,” Journal of Educational Media, vol. 28, no. 2-3, pp. 99-100 (2003).
A. Rossett, F. Douglis and R. Frazee, “Strategies for Building Blended Learning.,” 2010. [Online]. Available: http://www.astd.org/LC/2003/0703_rossett.htm. [Accessed 20 10 2017].
S. J. McMillan, “Exploring Models of Interactivity from Multiple Research Traditions: Users, Documents, And Systems,” in Handbook of New Media, London, Sage, 2002, pp. 162-182.
C. J. Macdonald, E. J. Stodel, L. G. Farres, K. Briethaupt and M. A. Gabriel, “The Demand-Driven Learning Model as a Standard for Web-Based Learning,” 2002. [Online]. Available: http://elearnmag.acm.org/featured.cfm?aid=609737. [Accessed 29 October 2017].
M. J. Kintu and E. Kagembe, “Blended learning effectiveness: The Relationship Between Student Characteristics, Design Features and Outcomes,” International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, vol. 14, no. 1, p. 16–39 (2017).
N. F. Taharim, A. M. Lokman, W. A. R. Wan Mohd Isa and N. L. M. Noor, “A Relationship Model of Playful Interaction, Interaction Design, Kansei Engineering and Mobile Usability in Mobile Learning,” in Open System (ICOS), Kuching (2013).
E. Loukis, S. Georgiou and K. Pazalo, “A Value Flow Model for The Evaluation of an E-Learning Service,” in European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS), St. Gallen (2007).
Y. Kuo, A. E. Walker, B. R. Belland and L. E. E. Schroder, “A Predictive Study of Student Satisfaction in Online Education Programs,” International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, vol. 14, no. 1, p. 16–39 (2013).
D. H. Lim and H. J. Kim, “Motivation and Learner Characteristics Affecting Online Learning and Learning Application,” Journal of Educational Technology Systems, vol. 31, no. 4, p. 423–439 (2003).
K. M. Justice and C. Zhu, “Student Characteristics and Learning Outcomes in a Blended Learning Environment Intervention in a Ugandan University,” The Electronic Journal of E-Learning, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 181-195 (2016).
M. Holtzblatt and N. Tschakert, “Expanding Your Accounting Classroom With Digital Video Technology,” Journal of Accounting Education, vol. 29, no. 2-3, p. 100–121 (2011).
T. Krasnova and M. Demeshko, “Tutor-mediated Support in Blended Learning,” in Social and Behavioral Sciences (2015).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Kamsin, I.F., Taharim, N.F., Zainal, N.K., Sithiq, H.A.A.H. (2018). Investigating User Experience on Blended Learning. In: Lokman, A., Yamanaka, T., Lévy, P., Chen, K., Koyama, S. (eds) Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Kansei Engineering and Emotion Research 2018. KEER 2018. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 739. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-8612-0_84
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-8612-0_84
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-8611-3
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-8612-0
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)