Evaluating Students’ Emotional Response in Mobile Learning Using Kansei Engineering

Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 739)

Abstract

Mobile learning is able to provide flexibility and conduciveness in learning, as learning materials are accessible anywhere and anytime using mobile devices. However, there are limited studies on understanding students’ emotion and emotional presence pertaining to online and mobile learning environments. Therefore, the main objective of this research is to identify the design elements for affective mobile learning material design. Kansei Engineering (KE) is being applied as the methodology for this research. In this research 10 specimens of mobile learning materials were installed from the Play Store specifically for the Database course where these specimens were evaluated using 25 Kansei Emotion Words (KW). A total of 31 participants have taken part in the experiment and conducted the experiment to assess students’ emotional response to mobile learning materials. The findings in this research reveal the five pillars of Kansei semantic space of emotions for mobile learning materials. Based on the Factor Analysis (FA), it reveals that the five pillars that consist of fun-motivated, learnable, challenging, preoccupied and engaged. On the other hand, this research also discusses design elements of mobile learning materials that might evoke certain emotions based on the five pillars that can be identified using the Partial Least Square (PLS) Analysis based on the interface design. However, there were some limitations and constraints during the course of the research such as the limitation of participants that were involved in the evaluation experiment, the mobile phone operating system itself and the technology that were used in this research. Therefore, future researchers should be able to deploy the research by including participants from various levels and can also use different mobile operating systems as well as technology in assessing the mobile learning environment.

Keywords

Kansei Engineering Emotional Design Mobile Learning Student Emotion 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Raza, A., Capretz, L.F. & Ahmed, F.: Users’ perception of open source usability: An empirical study, Engineering with Computers, vol. 28, No 2, pp. 109-121. Springer (2012).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Little, B.: Issues in mobile learning technology. Human Resource Management International Digest, 21 (3), pp. 26-29 (2013).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sarsar, F.: The Effectiveness of Emotional Motivational Feedback Messages. (Doctoral dissertation). Georgia State University, USA (2014).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Phirangee, K. and Hewitt, J.: Loving this Dialogue: Expressing Emotion Through the Strategic Manipulation of Limited Non-Verbal Cues in Online Learning Environments. In: Tettegah, S. Y., McCreery, M. P.(eds.) Emotions, Technology, and Learning. Academic Press (2015).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chen, C.-M. and Wang, H.-P.: Using emotion recognition technology to assess the effects of different multimedia materials on learning emotion and performance, Library & Information Science Research, vol.33, pp.244-255 (2011).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Jeong, H.-Y. and Yeo S.-S.: The quality model for e-learning system with multimedia : a pairwise comparison approach, Multimedia Tools and Applications (2013).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Marchand, G. C.and Gutierrez, A. P.: The role of emotion in the learning process: Comparisons between online and face-to-face learning settings. The Internet and Higher Education, vol 15(3), pp. 150-160 (2012).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Angelaki, C. and Mavroidis, I.: Communication and social presence: The impact on adult learners’ emotions in distance learning. In European Journal of Open, Distance and e‐Learning, vol 16(1), pp. 78-93 (2013).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
  10. 10.
    Brave, S., and Nass, C.: Emotion in human-computer interaction. In: Jacko, J., Sears, A. (eds.), Handbook of human-computer interaction pp. 251–271. New York: Erlbaum (2002).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Adolphs, R.: Recognizing emotion from facial expressions: Psychological and neurological mechanisms. Behavioral and Cognitive Neuroscience Reviews, vol 1(1), pp. 21–62 (2002).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lang, P. J.: The emotion probe: Studies of motivation and attention. American Psychologist, vol 50(5), pp. 372–385 (1995).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Russell, J. A.: A circumplex model of affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol 39(1), pp.1161–1178 (1980).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wu, L., and Looi, C.-K.: Agent prompts: Scaffolding for productive reflection in an intelligent learning environment. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, vol 15(1), pp. 339–353. (2012). http://www.ifets.info/journals/15_1/29.pdf, last accessed 2016/02/30.
  15. 15.
    Denton, D.: Reflection and learning: Characteristics, obstacles, and implications. Educational Philosophy and Theory, vol 43(8), pp. 838–852 (2011).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Grossman, R.: Structures for facilitating student reflection, College Teaching, vol 57(1), pp. 15–22 (2009).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Robert, J.: A study on Mobile learning as a learning style in modern research practice, i-managerˈs Journal on School Educational Technology, vol.8, no. 4, pp. 29-37. March-May (2013).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Harriman, G.: Mobile Learning. (2007). http://www.Grayharriman.com/mlearning.htm, last accessed 2015/06/04.
  19. 19.
    Kinshuk: Adaptive mobile learning technologies. (2013). http://kcweb.org.uk/weblibraryM-L.pdf, last accessed 2015/10/15.
  20. 20.
    Hsu, Y.-C., Ching, Y.-H.and Chareen, S.: Research priorities in mobile learning: An international Delphi study, Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, vol.40, no.2, Spring (2014).Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Taleb, Z., and Sohrabi, A.: Learning on the Move: The use of Mobile Technology to support Learning for University Students.Prcedia- Social and Behavioral Sciences. 69 (lecepsy), pp.1102-1109 (2012).Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Wang, Y., Wu, M., and Wang, H.: Investigating the determinants, age and gender differences in the acceptance of mobile learning, Journal of Educational Technology.vol. 40, no.1, pp. 92 -119 (2009).Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Tsinakos, A. and Ally.: Global Mobile learning implementation and trends. Beijing, Chines. CRTVU press (2013).Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Nagamachi, M.: Perspectives and the New Trend of Kansei/Affective Engineering, The TQM Journal, Vol. 20, No. 4, pp 290-298 (2008).Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Nagamachi, M. and Lokman, A.M.: Innovations of Kansei Engineering, CRC Press Taylor & Francis Group, Boca Raton, Florida, U.S.A (2011).Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Lokman, A.M and Nagamachi, M.: Kansei Engineering: a beginner’s persperctive. Malaysia: UPENA (2010).Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Nagamachi, M.: Kansei/affective engineering, CRC Press (2010).Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Redzuan, F., Lokman, A.M., and Othman, Z.A.: Kansei semantic space for emotion in online learning. In: User Science and Engineering (i-USEr), 2014 3rd International Conference. pp.168-173. IEEE (2014).Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R.E., and Tatham, R. L.: Multivariate data analysis Vol. 6. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall (2006).Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Chuah, K.E.E.M.A.N., Chen, C.J., and Teh,C.S.: Designing a desktop virtual reality-based learning environment with emotional consideration. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, vol 6(1), pp. 25-42 (2011).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Computer and Mathematical SciencesUniversiti Teknologi MARAShah AlamMalaysia

Personalised recommendations