Advertisement

Kansei Design Customization based on Personality Modelling

  • Zahrah Yahya
  • M. Yaser Shafazand
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 739)

Abstract

Product designers are obliged to meet the user’s desires; both implicit and explicit ones. Identifying the implicit needs is a complicated task. The methods of Kansei Engineering (KE) have aided in this process by using analysis of human emotions. KE starts by detecting the feelings and emotions towards a developing product and ends in giving product designs that satisfy users. However, can a single design satisfy all users? How can customization be done without losing any Kansei? Knowing the different needs and types of emotional expression between human personalities, this paper explores how modifications in the KE Framework can capture these differences and apply them to the final designs. The results of this process will be a set of customized designs for groups of similar personalities, knowing each design has captured the different interests of those groups.

Keywords

Kansei engineering Kansei design Kansei words personality type Enneagram MBTI 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    M. Nagamachi,: The Story of Kansei Engineering (in Japanese), Japanese Standards Association, 6. Tokyo (2003).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    M. Nagamachi and A. M. Lokman,: “Innovations of Kansei Engineering: Industrial Innovation Series,” Taylor Francis (2010).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    M. Nagamachi,: “Kansei engineering: a new ergonomic consumer-oriented technology for product development,” Int. J. Ind. Ergon., vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 3–11 (1995).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    A. Harper,: “Psychometric tests are now a multi-million-pound business: What lies behind a coach’s decision to use them,” Int. J. Evid. Based Coach. Mentor., vol. 2, pp. 40–51 (2008).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    I. Azzadina, A. N. Huda, and C. P. M. Sianipar,: “Understanding relationship between personality types, Marketing-mix factors, and purchasing decisions,” Procedia-Soc. Behav. Sci., vol. 65, pp. 352–357 (2012).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    N. Maehle and R. Shneor,: “On congruence between brand and human personalities,” J. Prod. Brand Manag., vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 44–53 (2010).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    T. T. T. Wee,: “Extending human personality to brands: The stability factor,” J. Brand Manag., vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 317–330 (2004).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Q.-X. Qu,: “Kansei knowledge extraction based on evolutionary genetic algorithm: an application to e-commerce web appearance design,” Theor. Issues Ergon. Sci., vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 299–313 (2015).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    J. L. Aaker,: “Dimensions of brand personality,” J. Mark. Res., pp. 347–356 (1997).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    R. Barkhi and L. Wallace,: “The impact of personality type on purchasing decisions in virtual stores,” Inf. Technol. Manag., vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 313–330 (2007).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    K. Siddiqui,: “Individual differences in consumer behaviour,” Interdiscip. J. Contemp. Res. Bus., vol. 2, no. 11, pp. 475–486 (2011).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    R. Aktivia, T. Djatna, and Y. Nurhadryani,: “Visual usability design for mobile application based on user personality,” in Advanced Computer Science and Information Systems (ICACSIS), 2014 International Conference on, 2014, pp. 177–182.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    L. Alboaie, M.-F. Vaida, and D. Pojar,: “Alternative methodologies for automated grouping in education and research,” in Proceedings of the CUBE International Information Technology Conference, 2012, pp. 508–513.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    D. R. Hudson and R. Hudson,: “The wisdom of Enneagram,” Bantam Dell Publ. Random House (1999).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    X. Zhou, X. Zhou, H. Liang, H. Liang, Z. Dong, and Z. Dong,: “A personalized recommendation model for online apparel shopping based on Kansei engineering,” Int. J. Cloth. Sci. Technol., vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 2–13 (2017).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    I. Ishihara, T. Nishino, Y. Matsubara, T. Tsuchiya, F. Kanda, and K. Inoue,: “Kansei And Product Development (In Japanese), Ed. M,” M Nagamachi, vol. 1 (2005).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    A. M. Lokman,: “Design & emotion: The kansei engineering methodology,” Malays. J. Comput., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1–11 (2010).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    A. M. Lokman, M. B. C. Haron, S. Z. Z. Abidin, and N. E. A. Khalid, “Natphoric Kansei Engi-neering Systems (N-KES),” J. Telecommun. Electron. Comput. Eng. JTEC, vol. 9, no. 2–3, pp. 77–81 (2017).Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    C. M. Brugha,: “Implications from decision science for the systems development life cycle in information systems,” Inf. Syst. Front., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 91–105 (2001).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Computing and Technological ScienceKolej Universiti Poly-Tech MARAKuala LumpurMalaysia
  2. 2.Faculty of Computer Science and Information TechnologyUniversiti PutraSerdangMalaysia

Personalised recommendations