Advertisement

A Text Mining Approach for Automatic Modeling of Kansei Evaluation from Review Texts

  • Atsuhiro Yamada
  • Sho Hashimoto
  • Noriko Nagata
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 739)

Abstract

In the field of product design, it is important to meet the specific user’s affective needs in addition to function and price. For that purpose, a Kansei evaluation model expressing the relationships between a low-level impression related to physical characteristics and a high-level impression (affective needs) is being constructed in the field of Kansei engineering. However, the conventional modeling method involves a lot of time and effort, because it depends on experiments involving humans and on subsequent analyses. To solve this problem, we propose a method that automatically constructs a Kansei evaluation model for product design using review texts on the Web. The method consists of three steps. First, we collect and select evaluation words with word classes and Japanese dictionaries of evaluation expressions. Second, we estimate the impression axes particular to a domain with the topic model that uses only the evaluation words. Finally, we score each product for each evaluation axis, using the frequencies of the appearance of evaluation words and term-scores. The results of the application of the method to reviews of wristwatches and the subjective evaluation experiment with topics for visual impressions show the utility and validity of the method.

Keywords

Affect Auto scoring Kansei evaluation model Text mining 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Qu, Q.-X.: Kansei knowledge extraction based on evolutionary genetic algorithm: an application to e-commerce web appearance design. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science 16(3), 299–313 (2015).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chen, C. H., Khoo, L. P., Chen, K., Pang, J. H., & Huang, Y.: Consumer-oriented product form creation via Kansei engineering. Proceedings of the international symposium for emotion and sensibility e emotion research in practice, 184–191 (2008).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Jing, Y., Ting, J., & Jianbo, X.: A Study on Interaction Design of Elderly Mobile Termi-nals Based on Kansei Engineering. In: Proceedings of the 2016 International Conference on Robots & Intelligent System (ICRIS), pp. 59–62. IEEE, Zhangjiajie (2016).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Jing, Y., Ting, J., & Jianbo, X.: A Study on Interaction Design of Elderly Mobile Termi-nals Based on Kansei Engineering. In: 9th International Proceedings on Proceedings, pp. 1–2. Publisher, Location (2010).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Aiba, E., Takamatsu, N., Numata, K., Yanagita, S., Suzuki, S., Sato, T., … Takada, K.: Differences in ‘Kansei’Space between Age Groups. Transactions of Japan Society of Kansei Engineering 15(7), 677–685 (2016).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lokman, A. M., Haron, M. B. C., Abidin, S. Z. Z., & Khalid, N. E. A.: Automating ex-pert role to determine design concept in Kansei Engineering. In: Aip conference proceedings (Vol. 1705), p. 20003. AIP Publishing, Bali (2016).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Htay, S. S., & Lynn, K. T.: Extracting product features and opinion words using pat-tern knowledge in customer reviews. The Scientific World Journal 2013 (2013).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Santosh, D. T., Babu, K. S., Prasad, S. D. V., & Vivekananda, A.: Opinion Mining of Online Product Reviews from Traditional LDA Topic Clusters using Feature Ontology Tree and Sentiwordnet. International Journal of Education and Management Engineering (IJEME) 6(6), 34–44 (2016).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Teh, Y. W., Jordan, M. I., Beal, M. J., & Blei, D. M.: Sharing Clusters among Related Groups: Hierarchical Dirichlet Processes. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 17, pp. 1385-1392, MIT Press (2005).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Blei, D. M., & Lafferty, J. D.: Topic models. Text mining: classification, clustering, and applications 10(71), 34 (2009).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kudo, T., Yamamoto, K., & Matsumoto, Y.: Applying Conditional Random Fields to Japanese Morphological Analysis. In: Lin, D., Wu, D. (eds.) Proceedings of EMNLP 2004, pp. 230–237. Association for Computational Linguistics, Barcelona (2004).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kurohashi, S.: Improvements of Japanese morphological analyzer JUMAN. In: Proceed-ings of the workshop on sharable natural language resources, pp. 22–28. Nara (1994).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kobayashi, N., Inui, K., Matsumoto, Y., Tateishi, K., & Fukushima, T.: Collecting Evaluative Expressions for Opinion Extraction. Journal of Natural Language Processing 12(3), 203–222 (2005).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kobayashi, N., Inui, K., & Matsumoto, Y.: Designing the task of opinion extraction and structurization. IPSJ SIG Technical Report, NL171-18, 111-118 (2006).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Higashiyama, M., Inui, K., & Matsumoto, Y.: Learning sentiment of nouns from selectional preferences of verbs and adjectives. In: Proceedings of the 14th Annual Meeting of the Association for Natural Language Processing, pp. 584–587. The Association for Natural Language Processing, Tokyo (2008). (In Japanese)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Sano, M.: The construction of “Japanese dictionary of appraisal -attitude-” ~Development of language resource to capture diversity of evaluation. In: Proceedings of the 17th Annual Meeting of the Association for Natural Language Processing, pp. 115–118. The Association for Natural Language Processing, Toyohashi (2010). (In Japanese)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sano, M.: Japanese Dictionary of Appraisal —attitude— (JAppraisal Dictionary ver1.0). Gengo Shigen Kyokai (2010). (In Japanese)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Kwansei Gakuin UniversitySandaJapan

Personalised recommendations