Consumers’ visual attention and emotional perception of sustainable product information: Case study of furniture

  • Victoria Pérez-Belis
  • Maria-Jesus Agost
  • Margarita Vergara
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 739)


Transparency about product information is increasingly accessible, due to factors such as market globalization and the fast growing of new communication technologies. This fact has facilitated the appearance of well-informed consumers who are concerned about the repercussions of their purchasing choices on, for example, their own health, the environment, or even the social conditions of workers. Information about sustainable aspects of product lifecycle is often presented through labels located on the product itself or on its packaging. Apart from providing information to consumers, these labels need to connect to their environmental subjective perception, in order to integrate them into their purchase criteria. However, literature shows that some of them are not effective or well understood by consumers. Through the application of product semantics and eye-tracking, an objective technique measuring visual attention, this communication shows the results of a study on consumer perception of different sustainable labels applied to furniture. Twenty-six subjects were recruited to analyze their perception and knowledge about labels related to three different sustainable dimensions: environment, workers respect and customer health, through semantic differential evaluation. Besides, visual attention was measured using eye-tracking technology. Some descriptive and comparative statistical analyses about visual behavior on different areas of interest were completed considering eye-tracking metrics. Results show some significant differences in the time spent looking at label areas, and also in the number of right answers, depending on different factors.


Visual Attention Eye-Tracking Product Information Sustainability 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Ibáñez-Forés, V., Pacheco-Blanco, B., Capuz-Rizo, S. F., Bovea, M. D.: Environmental Product Declarations: Exploring their evolution and the factors affecting their demand in Europe. Journal of Cleaner Production 116, 157–169 (2016).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Borin, N., Cerf, D. C., Krishnan, R.: Consumer effects of environmental impact in product labeling. Journal of Consumer Marketing 28(1), 76–86 (2011).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    ISO 14020. Environmental Labels and Declarations. General Principles. International Standard Organization, Geneva, Switzerland (2000).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    De Carvalho, B. L., Salgueiro, M. D. F., Rita, P.: Consumer Sustainability Consciousness: A five dimensional construct. Ecological Indicators 58, 402–410 (2015).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Schumacher, I.: Ecolabeling, consumers’ preferences and taxation. Ecological Economics 69(11), 2202–2212 (2010).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    European Economic and Social Committee: The influence of lifespan labelling on consumers: Visits and Publications. Unit EESC-2016-13-EN, 100., last accessed 2017/06/28.
  7. 7.
    European Commission, Flash Eurobarometer 367 Attitudes of Europeans towards building the single market for green products, 114 (2013).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Brécard, D.: Consumer confusion over the profusion of eco-labels: Lessons from a double differentiation model. Resource and Energy Economics 37, 64–84 (2014).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Berger, V., Hari, J.: Consumers and Eco-labelling: A Repertory Grid Study. Academy of Marketing Conference Paper 170, Southampton University, Southampton, United Kingdom (2012).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Janssen, M., Hamm, U.: Product labelling in the market for organic food: consumer preferences and willingness-to-pay for different organic certification logos. Food Quality and Preference 25(1), 9–22 (2012).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    OECD, Promoting Sustainable Consumption Good Practives in OECD Countries (2008).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Grunert, K. G., Aachmann, K.: Consumer reactions to the use of EU quality labels on food products: A review of the literature. Food Control 59, 178–187 (2016).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Rousseau, S.: The role of organic and fair trade labels when choosing chocolate. Food Quality and Preference 44, 92–100 (2015).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ozaki, R., Pickett-baker, J.: Pro-environmental products: marketing influence on consumer purchase decision. Journal of Consumer Marketing 25(5), 281–293 (2008).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ares, G., Giménez, A., Bruzzone, F., Vidal, L., Antúnez, L., Maiche, A.: Consumer Visual Processing of Food Labels: Results from an Eye-Tracking Study. Journal of Sensory Studies 28(2), 138–153 (2013).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Piqueras-Fiszman, B., Velasco, C., Salgado-Montejo, A., Spence, C.: Using combined eye tracking and word association in order to assess novel packaging solutions: A case study involving jam jars. Food Quality and Preference 28(1), 328–338 (2013).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    ISO 14024. Environmental Labels and Declarations. Type I environmental labelling - Principles and procedures. International Standard Organization, Geneva, Switzerland (1999).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ehmke, C., Wilson, S.: Identifying Web Usability Problems from Eyetracking Data. British HCI Conference, University of Lancaster, United Kingdom (2007).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Victoria Pérez-Belis
    • 1
  • Maria-Jesus Agost
    • 1
  • Margarita Vergara
    • 1
  1. 1.Mechanical Engineering and Construction DepartmentUniversitat Jaume ICastellónSpain

Personalised recommendations