Advertisement

A Study on the Attractive Factors for Ceramic Product: The Case of Teapot

  • Bao-Yi Zhang
  • Min-Yuan Ma
  • Xing-Min Lin
  • Juan Li
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 739)

Abstract

The enduring appeal of ceramic products in history comes from its practical and aesthetic values. This unique charm cannot be replaced by other products and is also an important reason to attract consumers. Finding consumer’s emotional preferences plays a significant role in product development. However, research which has empirically documented the link between user emotional demand and ceramic product design strategy is scant. This paper attempts to investigate how the constituent elements of ceramic product affect user’s psychological feeling, and clarify the relationship between various kinds of ceramic products and user emotions. The purpose of this study is to build guidelines in order to provide design strategies for designer. Evaluation Grid Method was used to find out the attractive factors and proposed some important abstract and concrete features for ceramic product. Quantification Theory Type I was conducted to identify potential relationships between ceramic product and users. results of this study depicted the attractive factors for ceramic product and showed how various ceramic products appeal to people with detailed and hierarchical information, which can be design strategies for manufacturers and thus improve the positive emotions experienced by users.

Keywords

Ceramic product EGM Quantification Theory Type I 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Cagan, J., & Vogel, C. M.: Creating breakthrough products: Innovation from product planning to program approval: Ft Press (2002).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Nagamachi, M.: Kansei engineering: a new ergonomic consumer-oriented technology for product development. International Journal of industrial ergonomics, 15(1), 3-11 (1995).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sanui, J.: Visualization of users’ requirements: Introduction of the Evaluation Grid Method. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 3rd Design & Decision Support Systems in Architecture & Urban Planning Conference (1996).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Tama, I. P., Azlia, W., & Hardiningtyas, D.: Development of customer oriented product design using Kansei engineering and Kano model: Case study of ceramic souvenir. Procedia Manufacturing, 4, 328-335 (2015).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ujigawa, M.: The evolution of preference-based design. Research and development Institute, 46, 1-10 (2000).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Yuanyuan Dai.: To enhance the value-added design method of daily-use ceramic products. Wuhan University of Technology (2007).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lijun Huang.: The relationship Between Female Life Aesthetics Characteristics and Ceramics Technicalas Exemplified by the Tea Set Design. National Taipei University of Technology (2009).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Jiajing Liao.: A Study on the Design Strategies for Daily Use Ceramics. National Yunlin University of Science and Technology (2003).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bao-Yi Zhang
    • 1
  • Min-Yuan Ma
    • 1
  • Xing-Min Lin
    • 1
  • Juan Li
    • 1
  1. 1.National Cheng Kung UniversityTainan CityTaiwan R.O.C.

Personalised recommendations