Abstract
Articulated landing gears have relatively lower stowage volume and provide better taxiing characteristics when compared to telescopic gears. Unlike telescopic configuration, the articulated configurations do not have the same stroke for wheel axle and shock absorber travel. The objective of this work is to study and compare the dynamics of the articulated main landing gear, during level and tail-down landing conditions, using MSC/ADAMS software. The results are compared with the available landing gear analysis program, which has been experimentally validated by the drop tests. A 12.3% reduction in total vertical wheel axle travel is observed in tail-down condition when compared to level landing, due to the kinematic configuration. It results in 18.9% and 14.8% increase in dynamic load in limit and reserve landing respectively for tail-down condition. Also, the tire deflections are relatively higher and the shock absorber travel is relatively lower, in tail-down landing for both limit and reserve conditions.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Abbreviations
- LG:
-
Landing Gear
- MIL:
-
Military Standard
- FAR:
-
Federal Aviation Regulations
- MLG:
-
Main Landing Gear
- WA:
-
Wheel Axle
- SA:
-
Shock Absorber
- Fs:
-
Total Shock Absorber Force (N)
- Fa:
-
Pneumatic Force (N)
- Fh:
-
Hydraulic Force (N)
- n:
-
Polytropic Index
- N:
-
Dynamic Load Factor or Reaction Factor
- ηsa:
-
Efficiency of Shock Absorber
- ηt:
-
Efficiency of Tire
- Pe:
-
Extended Pressure in the Shock Absorber (Pa)
- Ve:
-
Extended Volume in the Shock Absorber (m3)
- Ps:
-
Static Pressure in the Shock Absorber (Pa)
- Vs:
-
Static Volume in the Shock Absorber (m3)
- Pr:
-
Reserve Pressure in the Shock Absorber (Pa)
- Vr:
-
Reserve Volume in the Shock Absorber (m3)
- Pao:
-
Initial Pressure in the Shock Absorber (Pa)
- Vao:
-
Initial Volume in the Shock Absorber (m3)
- Aao:
-
Pneumatic Area (m2)
- s/St:
-
Shock Absorber Stroke (m)
- Swa:
-
Wheel Axle Travel (m)
- v:
-
Velocity of Aircraft (m/s)
- g:
-
Acceleration due to gravity (m/s2)
- ρ:
-
Density of hydraulic oil (kg/m3)
- Ah:
-
Hydraulic Area (m2)
- An:
-
Net Orifice Area (m2)
- Cd:
-
Coefficient of Discharge
- \( {\dot{\text{s}}} \) :
-
Shock Strut Telescopic Velocity (m/s)
- Fty:
-
Tire Force (N)
- z:
-
Tire Deflection (m)
- L:
-
Aircraft Lift (N)
- W1:
-
Weight of Sprung Mass (N)
- W2:
-
Weight of Unsprung Mass (N)
- m1:
-
Sprung Mass (kg)
- m2:
-
Unsprung Mass (kg)
- Fva:
-
Vertical Force on Wheel Axle (N)
- Fha:
-
Horizontal Force on Wheel Axle (N)
- Fvg:
-
Vertical Ground Reaction (N)
- Fhg:
-
Horizontal Ground Reaction (N)
- z1:
-
Deflection of Sprung mass (m)
- z2:
-
Deflection of Unsprung mass (m)
References
G. Temple, Prediction of Undercarriage Reactions, R & M No. 1927, 1944. (RAE Report, S.M.E. 3298, 1945)
M. Franz, Theoretical and experimental principles of landing gear research and development. Luftfahrtforschung 14(8), 387–419 (1937)
M.A. Biot, R.L. Bisplinghoff, Dynamic loads on airplane structures during landing, NACA Wartime Report, W-92 (1944)
W. Flugge, Landing gear impact, NACA TN 2743 (1952)
C.C. Daughetee, Drop testing naval aircraft and the VSD landing gear dynamic test facility, in 15th ASME Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference (AIAA Paper, 1974)
G.L. Ghiringhelli, Testing of semiactive landing gear control for a general aviation aircraft. J. Aircr. 37(4), 606–616 (2000)
D.H. Chester, A parametric study of aircraft landing-impact, with emphasis on nose gear landing conditions, in ICAS Congress (2000)
T. Niezgoda, J. Malachowski, W. Kowalski, Numerical Simulation of Landing Gear Dynamics (XXI, Mecanica Computacional, 2002), pp. 2579–2586
J.P. Kong, Y.S. Lee, J.D. Han, O.S. Ahn, Drop impact analysis of smart unmanned aerial vehicle (SUAV) landing gear and comparison with experimental data. Materialwiss. Werkstofftech. 40(3), 192–197 (2009)
Z. Wen, Z. Zhi, Z. Qidan, X. Shiyue, Dynamics model of carrier-based aircraft landing gears landed on dynamic deck. Chin. J. Aeronaut. 22, 371–379 (2009)
C.J. Xue, Y. Han, W.G. Qi, J.H. Dai, Landing gear drop test rig development and application for light airplanes, J. Aircr. 49(6) (2012)
R. Jakubowski, A. Tywoniuk, An energy absorption dynamic test of landing gear for 1400 Kg general aviation aircraft. J. KONES Powertrain Transp. 23(4), 159–165 (2016)
H.G. Conway, Landing Gear Design (Chapman & Hall Ltd., 1958)
N.S. Curry, Landing Gear Design Handbook (Lockheed-Georgia Company, Marietta, Georgia, 1982)
P. Jayarami Reddy, V.T. Nagaraj, V. Ramamurti, Analysis of a semi-levered suspension landing gear with some parametric study. J. Dyn. Syst. Meas. Contr. 106(3), 218–224 (1984)
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank Mr. P. Jayarami Reddy, for his kind support.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Kadam, M., Sathish, S., Bujurke, A., Joshi, K., Gopalsamy, B. (2019). Dynamics of Articulated Landing Gear in Tail-Down Landing Condition. In: Badodkar, D., Dwarakanath, T. (eds) Machines, Mechanism and Robotics. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-8597-0_17
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-8597-0_17
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-8596-3
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-8597-0
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)