An Audience Perspective on Disaster Response

  • Kurniawan Adi SaputroEmail author


Media audience perspective can shed light on different barriers faced by the people when joining collective actions in response to disasters. There are barriers to forming collective attention, formulating the problem, imagining the others, building resources, and crossing private-public thresholds. Using a case study of the Mount Merapi disaster in 2010, this chapter reveals that certain sociotechnical conditions were necessary for a successful disaster relief response in the age of new media.


Media audience Mediated disaster response Mount Merapi Volcano eruption 


  1. Adams, P. (2012). Grouped: how small groups of friends are the key to influence on the social web. New Rider.Google Scholar
  2. Amir, S. & Kant, V. (2018). Sociotechnical Resilience: A Preliminary Concept. Risk Analysis, 38: 8–16. Scholar
  3. Boltanski, L. (2004). Distant suffering: morality, media, and politics. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  4. boyd, d. (2011). Social network sites as networked publics: affordances, dynamics, and implications. In Networked self: identity, community, and culture on social network sites, edited by Z. Papacharissi, 39–58. Routledge.Google Scholar
  5. Bruns, A. & Burgess, J. E. (2012). Local and global responses to disaster: #eqnz and the christchurch earthquake. In Conference proceedings of disaster and emergency management conference, edited by P. Sugg, 86–103. Brisbane, AST Management.Google Scholar
  6. Bruns, A., Burgess, J., Crawford, K., & Shaw, F. (2012). #qldfloods and @qpsmedia: crisis communication on Twitter in the 2011 south-east Queensland floods. ARC Centre of Excellence for Creative Industries and Innovation.Google Scholar
  7. Carah, N. & Louw, E. (2012). ‘Inundatedy by the audience: journalism, audience participation, and the 2011 Brisbane flood’. Media International Australia 144(1), 137–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cedillos, V. & Alexander N. (2010). ‘Learning from earthquakes: Indonesia earthquake and tsunami’. EERI Newsletter 44(12), 4.Google Scholar
  9. Chouliaraki, L. (2006). The spectatorship of suffering. Sage.Google Scholar
  10. Cialdini, R. B., Brwon, S. L., Lewis, B. P., Luce, C., & Neuber, S. L. (1997). ‘Reinterpreting the empathy-altruism relationship’. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 73(3), 481–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Couldry, N., Livingstone, S., & Markham, T. (2007). Media consumption and public engagement: beyond the presumption of attention. Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  12. Dayan, D. (2009). ‘Sharing and showing: television as monstration’. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 625(1), 19–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Drabek, T. T. & McEntire, D. A. (2003). ‘Emergent phenomena and the sociology of disaster: lessons, trends, and opportunities from the research literature.’ Disaster Prevention and Management 12(2), 97–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ewart, J. & Dekker, S. (2013). ‘Radio, someone still loves you!: talkback radio and community emergence during disasters’. Journal of Media and Cultural Studies 27(3), 365–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fine, G. A. & White R. D. (2002). ‘Creating collective attention in the public domain: human interest narratives and the rescue of Floyd Collins’. Social Forces 81(1), 57–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fritz, C. E. & Williams, H. B. (1957). ‘The human being in disasters: a research perspective’. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 309(1), 42–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hindman, D. B. & Coyle, K. (1999). ‘Audience orientations to local radio coverage of a natural disaster’. Journal of Radio and Audio Media 6(1), 8–26.Google Scholar
  18. Houston, J. B., Pfefferbaum, B., & Rosenholtz, C. E. (2012). ‘Disaster news: framing and frame changing in coverage of major U.S. natural disasters, 2000–2010’. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 89(4), 606–623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Houston, J. B., Hawthorne, J., Perreault, M. F., Park, E. H., Hode, M. G., Halliwell, M. R., McGowen, S. E. T., Davis, R., Vaid, S., McElderry, J. A., & Griffith, S. A. (2014). ‘Social media and disasters: a functional framework for social media use in disaster planning, response, and research’. Disasters 39(1), 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. IFRC. (2011). Protect. Promote. Recognize: volunteering in emergencies. Report. Swedish Red Cross.Google Scholar
  21. Knight, A. (2006). ‘Covering disasters and the media mandate’. Media Asia 33(1–2), 47–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kurnia, A. (2014). ‘Surono berdiri di cincin api.’ Available at: Accessed at June 18, 2017.
  23. Meier, P. & Munro, R. (2010). ‘The unprecedented role of SMS in disaster response: learning from Haiti’. SAIS Review 30(2), 91–103.Google Scholar
  24. Mendonca, D., Jefferson, T., & Harrald, J. (2007). ‘Collaborative adhocracies and mix-and-match technologies in emergency management: using the emergent interoperability approach to address unanticipated contingencies during emergency response.’ Communication of the ACM 50(3), 45–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Moeller, S. D. (1999). Compassion fatigue: how the media sell disease, famine, war and death. Routledge.Google Scholar
  26. Nielsen (2010). Watching natural disaster on tv news. Nielsen Newsletter 11(Nov), 1. Jakarta, Nielsen.Google Scholar
  27. Nugroho, Y., Amalia, D., Nugraha, L. K., Putri, D. A., Tanaya, J., & Laksmi, S. (2013). Creating content, shaping society: do Indonesian media uphold the principle of citizenship? Engaging media, empowering society: Assessing media policy and governance in Indonesia through the lens of citizens' rights. Jakarta, CIPG and HIVOS.Google Scholar
  28. Pantti, M. (2015). ‘Grassroots humanitarianism on Youtube: ordinary fundraisers, unlikely donors, and global solidarity’. The International Communication Gazette 77(7), 622–636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Perez-lugo, M. (2004). ‘Media uses in disaster situations: a new focus on the impact phase’. Sociological Inquiry 74(2), 210–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Quarantelli, E. L. (1994). Emergent behaviors and groups in the crisis time period of disasters. Preliminary paper #206. Newark, Disaster Research Center.Google Scholar
  31. Quarantelli, E. L. (2003). A half century of social science disaster research: selected major findings and their applicability. Preliminary paper #36. [online]. Available at: Accessed June 29, 2017.
  32. Quarantelli, E. L. (2008). ‘Conventional beliefs and counterintuitive realities’. Social Research: An International Quarterly 75(3), 973–904.Google Scholar
  33. Saputro, K. A. (2014). Engaged audiences in the mediated disaster of Mount Merapi in 2010. Thesis. Sheffield Hallam University.Google Scholar
  34. Saputro, K. A. (2016). ‘Information volunteers’ strategies in crisis communication: the case of Mt. Merapi eruption in Indonesia 2010’. International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment 7(1), 63–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Starbird, K. & Stamberger, J. (2010). Tweak the tweet: leveraging microblogging proliferation with a prescriptive syntax to support citizen reporting. In: Proceedings of the 7th International ISCRAM Conference, May 2–5. Seattle, ISCRAM.Google Scholar
  36. Starbird, K. (2011). Digital volunteerism during disaster: crowdsourcing information processing. In: CHI 2011, May 7–12. Vancouver, ACM.Google Scholar
  37. Surono, Jousset P., Pallister, J., Boichu, M., Buongiorno, M. F., Budisantoso, A., Costa, F., Andreastuti, S., Prata, F., Schneider, D., Clarisse, L., Humaida, H., Sumarti, S., Bignami, C., Griswold, J., Carn, S., Oppenheimer, C., & Lavigne, F. (2012). ‘The 2010 explosive eruption of Java’s Merapi volcano: A ‘100-year’ event.’ Journal of Volcanonology and Geothermal Research 241–242(1), 121–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Tanesia, A. & Habibi, Z. (2011). ‘JALIN Merapi community information system in response to Mount Merapi’s 2010 eruption. n.p. Accessed at
  39. von Engelhardt, J. (2015). ‘Studying western audiences vis-a-vis mediated distant suffering: a call to venture beyond media studies’. The International Communication Gazette 77(7), 695–707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Vrasti, W. & Montsion, J. M. (2014). ‘No good deed goes unrewarded’. Global Society 28(3), 336–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Webster, J. G. (1986). ‘Audience behavior in the new media environment’. Journal of Communication 36(3), 77–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Webster, J. G. (2002). ‘The internet audience: web use as mass behavior’. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 46(1), 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Webster, J. G. (2005). ‘Beneath the veneer of fragmentation: television audience polarization in a multichannel world’. Journal of Communication 55(2), 366–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Webster, J. G., Phalen, P. F., & Lichty L. W. (2006). Ratings analysis: the theory and practice of audience research. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Indonesia Institute of the Arts YogyakartaYogyakartaIndonesia

Personalised recommendations