Mapping Sociotechnical Resilience

  • Vivek KantEmail author
  • Justyna Tasic


This chapter aims to introduce a blended framework for analyzing sociotechnical resilience and its applicability for the electricity sector. In our blended approach, derived from social sciences and engineering, we start the analysis of sociotechnical system from the bottom up to discover relations, interdependencies and entangled meanings in their contexts. From the systemic viewpoint, the sociotechnical system will be conceptualized as a meshwork of holons that can provide insights into system properties, such as embedded risks of systemic degradation, organizational vulnerabilities and emergency response capacity, among other aspects that contribute to sociotechnical resilience. When viewed from its totality, this meshwork of holons represents the ongoing exchanges of information, capital, and matter constrained by the sociomaterial infrastructure.


Sociotechnical systems Resilience Pentad Holon Electrical system 



This work is an outcome of the Future Resilient Systems project at the Singapore-ETH Centre (SEC), which is funded by the National Research Foundation of Singapore (NRF) under its Campus for Research Excellence and Technological Enterprise (CREATE) program (FI 370074011).


  1. Amir, S., & Kant, V. (2018). Sociotechnical Resilience: A Preliminary Concept. Risk Analysis, 38: 8–16. Scholar
  2. Arianos, S., Bompard, E., Carbone, A., & Xue, F. (2009). Power grid vulnerability: A complex network approach. Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science, 19(1), 013119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Burke, K. (1969). A grammar of motives. Berkeley: University of California Press. Original published in 1945.Google Scholar
  4. Dahlberg, R., Johannessen-Henry, C. T., Raju, E., & Tulsiani, S. (2015). Resilience in disaster research: three versions. Civil Engineering and Environmental Systems, 32(1–2), 44–54. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. De Bruijn, H., & Herder, P. M. (2009). System and actor perspectives on sociotechnical systems. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics-Part A: Systems and Humans, 39(5), 981–992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chang, Y. (2015). Energy in Singapore: The engine of economic growth from 1965 to 2065. In Quah, E. ed. (2016). Singapore 2065: leading insights on economy and environment from 50 Singapore icons and beyond. (pp. 343–347). New Jersey: World Scientific.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Energy Market Authority (2015). Singapore Energy Statistics 2015. Retrieved from (Accessed 05.05.2016).
  8. EMA (2010). Introduction to the National Electricity Market of Singapore. Retrieved from (Accessed 23.04.2016).
  9. EMA (2016) Chapter 5. System Operation, in Singapore Electricity Market Rules. Retrieved from,7842/Chapter_5_System_Operation_1Apr16.pdf (Accessed 05.05.2016).
  10. Gallopín, G. C. (2006). Linkages between vulnerability, resilience, and adaptive capacity. Global Environmental Change, 16(3), 293–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kapucu, N. (2006). Interagency communication networks during emergencies boundary spanners in multiagency coordination. The American Review of Public Administration, 36(2), 207–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Klein, R. J. T., Smit, M. J., Goosen, H., & Hulsbergen, C. H. (1998). Resilience and Vulnerability: Coastal Dynamics or Dutch Dikes? The Geographical Journal, 164(3), 259–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Koestler, A. (1971). The ghost in the machine. (2nd.print.). London: Pan Books. Original published in 1967.Google Scholar
  14. Holling, C. S. (1996). Engineering Resilience versus Ecological Resilience. In P. C. Schulze (Ed.), A common perceptual parameter for stair climbing for children, young and old adults (pp. 31–44). Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press. Retrieved from
  15. Hollnagel, E., Woods, D. D., & Leveson, N. (2006). Resilience engineering concepts and precepts. Aldershot, England; Burlington, VT: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  16. Ingold, T. (2007). Lines: a brief history. London; New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  17. Ingold, T. (2013). Making : anthropology, archaeology, art and architecture. London; New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  18. MTI (Ministry of Trade and Industry) (2007). Singapore’s National Energy Policy Report – Energy for Growth. Retrieved from (Accessed 23.03.2016).
  19. Ng, W. H. (2012). Singapore, the energy economy : from the first refinery to the end of cheap oil, 1960–2010. London; New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  20. Park, J., Seager, T. P., Rao, P. S. C., Convertino, M., & Linkov, I. (2013). Integrating Risk and Resilience Approaches to Catastrophe Management in Engineering Systems. Risk Analysis, 33(3), 356–367. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Pelling, M., & Wisner, B. (2012). Disaster risk reduction: Cases from urban Africa. Routledge.Google Scholar
  22. Perrow, C. (1984). Normal accidents : living with high-risk technologies. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  23. Polanyi, M. (2005). Personal Knowledge: Towards a Post-Critical Philosophy. London: Routledge. Original published in 1958.Google Scholar
  24. Sehgal, P. (2015). The Profound Emptiness of “Resilience.” Retrieved from
  25. Rasmussen, J. (1997). Risk management in a dynamic society: a modelling problem. Safety Science, 27(2), 183–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Rasmussen, J., & Svedung, I. (2000). Proactive risk management in a dynamic society. Karlstad, Sweden: Swedish Rescue Services Agency. Retrieved from
  27. Rosen, R. (2000). Essays on life itself. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Singapore Power (2010). Annual report 2010. Enhancing Capabilities Powering Growth. Retrieved from (Accessed 23.03.2016).
  29. Tasic, J., & Amir S. (2016). Informational Capital and Disaster Resilience: The Case of Jalin Merapi, Journal of Disaster Prevention and Management, 25(3), 1–18.Google Scholar
  30. Wagenaar, H., & Wilkinson, C. (2015). Enacting Resilience: A Performative Account of Governing for Urban Resilience. Urban Studies, 52(7), 1265–1284. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Walker, B., Holling, C. S., Carpenter, S. R., & Kinzig, A. (2004). Resilience, adaptability and transformability in social--ecological systems. Ecology and Society, 9(2), 5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Industrial Design CentreIndian Institute of Technology Bombay (IITB)MumbaiIndia
  2. 2.Institute of Catastrophe Risk Management, Interdisciplinary Graduate SchoolNanyang Technological UniversitySingaporeSingapore
  3. 3.Future Resilient SystemsSingapore-ETH CentreSingaporeSingapore

Personalised recommendations