Skip to main content

Why Did Leopards Kill Humans in Mumbai but not in Nairobi? Wildlife Management in and Around Urban National Parks

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
From Urban National Parks to Natured Cities in the Global South

Abstract

Why did leopards kill humans in Mumbai but not in Nairobi? Our initial hypothesis was that a different form of park management, more in harmony with that of the city, might explain the absence of leopard attacks on humans in Nairobi. We speculated that the actors in the two spheres coordinate their efforts to ensure better oversight of wildlife. This hypothesis was not confirmed. Instead, we see the importance of factors such as predation by leopards on populations of domestic dogs, the landscape configurations of the interfaces between park and city, and the diversity of representations of nature or social disparities, which generate differing vulnerabilities. This leads to a two-level conclusion regarding the role of the national trajectories in these countries of the Global South in respect of environmental concerns and their contribution to the new ways of understanding our relation to nature.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Around the world, leopard densities in rainforests have been estimated to not exceed 1 per 10 km² (Bailey 1993).

  2. 2.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=75Yq0rOIsMY. Accessed on January 7, 2016.

  3. 3.

    Though a lawyer from Mulund was killed in 2004, the only victim from the well-off social classes. He was in the habit of climbing into the park every morning before dawn… (Interview with members of the victim’s family, January 2014).

  4. 4.

    Ranjeet Jadhav, “Leopard devours 6-yr-old in Mulund”, Mid-Day, July 17, 2012, http://www.mid-day.com/articles/leopard-devours-6-yr-old-in-mulund/172727. Accessed on June 7, 2016.

  5. 5.

    Headed by the Community Warden, it also includes two corporals, two rangers, and a driver.

  6. 6.

    Interview, February 13, 2013.

  7. 7.

    See also Harrisson (1993): “Forests mark the provincial edge of Western civilization, in the literal as well as imaginative domains …. We call it the loss of nature, or the loss of wildlife habitat, or the loss of biodiversity, but underlying the ecological concern is perhaps a much deeper apprehension about the disappearance of boundaries, without which the human abode loses its grounding.” Leopard is to contribute to this transgression of boundaries….

  8. 8.

    Although in charge of SGNP and the neighbouring Tungareshwar Wildlife Sanctuary, the FD does not appear to be very interested in enhancing the connectivity between these two forests. Yet, creating corridors and helping leopards move within a larger network of forests could help release the pressure on the national park by decreasing its population of leopards. Also, since mobility is critical to leopard survival, geographic isolation—like in the case of the SGNP—can lead to inbreeding, depression and increased extinction risk of the leopard population (Edelblutte 2016).

  9. 9.

    They are also the first to call out on tribals undertaking illegal activities. During a field trip, E. Edelblutte visited a tribal village inside the park where a family was building a new house with better material than thatch since they had too many intrusions of leopards in their old house. A forest officer had to investigate after receiving a call from high-rise building residents living nearby who had reported “illegal activity from tribals”. The officer, empathetic towards their situation, just gave them a warning and told them to be more discreet, so that he does not get other calls from urban residents. Also note that Adivasi sometimes “use” leopard attacks to expose their living conditions and ask for better amenities (especially electricity, waste management system and public lighting) (Edelblutte 2016).

  10. 10.

    Interview, August 2, 1014.

  11. 11.

    Interview, July 21, 2014.

  12. 12.

    Interview, July 20, 2014.

  13. 13.

    Animals can be associated with black magic. We were told about a hyena that had been sent to kill an enemy’s livestock, but on the way had attacked the interviewee’s female cousin. The latter agreed that “yes, we need national parks… because animals are destructive, and otherwise elephants could kill people”. The park as protection for people, not wildlife….

  14. 14.

    Interview in Maasai Mara, March 24, 2012.

  15. 15.

    On the contrary, for many non-tribal Hindus the leopard has no prestige since it is not the vehicle of any god—unlike the tiger who is attached to Durga, Parvati or Shiva deities. (Yet in Himalayan states the leopard is regarded as the vehicle of the Goddess).

  16. 16.

    Locally, the KWS can be supported by other actors. For example, fauna in the Ngong Road Forest are partially managed by the Ngong Road Forest Sanctuary Trust, which sometimes also calls upon the Kenya Forest Service in the event of problems. Moreover, the recent decentralisation has given greater powers to the counties in the management of biodiversity (see Chap. 8), and the KWS could probably do more to gain support from elected officials.

References

  • Adams, W. M. (2004). Against extinction: The story of conservation. London: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agrawal, A. (2005). Environmentality: Technologies of government and the making of subjects. Durham; London: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Athreya, V., Odden, M., Linnell, J. D. C., & Karanth, K. U. (2011). Translocation as a Tool for Mitigating Conflict with Leopards in Human-Dominated Landscapes of India. Conservation Biology, 25(1), 133–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Athreya, V., Odden, M., Linnell, J. D. C., Krishnaswamy, J., & Karanth, K. U. (2014). A cat among the dogs: leopard Panthera pardus diet in a human-dominated landscape in western Maharashtra. India. Oryx, 50(1), 156–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, T. N. (1993). The African leopard. Ecology and behavior of a solitary felid. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baviskar, A. (2002). The politics of the city. Seminar, 516, 40–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanc, N., & Cohen, M. (2002). L’animal. Une figure de la géographie contemporaine. Espaces et Sociétés, 110–111, 25–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blanchon, D., Moreau, S., & Veyret, Y. (2009). Comprendre et construire la justice environnementale. Annales de Géographie, 1(665–666), 35–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brockington, D., Duffy, R., & Igoe, J. (2008). Nature unbound: Conservation, capitalism and the future of protected areas. London: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buller, H. (2013). Animal geographies I. Progress in Human Geography, 38(2), 308–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buller, H. (2014). Animal geographies II: Methods. Progress in Human Geography, 39(3), 374–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buller, H. (2015). Animal geographies III: Ethics. Progress in Human Geography, 40(3), 422–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butler, J. R. A., Linnell, J. D. C., Morrant, D., Athreya, V., Lescureux, N., & Mckeown, A. (2013). Dog eat dog, cat eat dog: Social-ecological dimensions of dog predation by wild carnivores. In M. E. Gompper (Ed.), Free-ranging dogs and wildlife conservation (pp. 117–143). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Chatterjee, P. (2004). The politics of the governed: Reflections on popular politics in most of the world. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Descola, P. (2013). Beyond nature and culture. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edelblutte, E. (2016). Landscape and political ecology approach for long-term conservation of leopards (Panthera pardus) in a human-dominated landscape, India. Report for UNPEC and EVS lab, University of Lyon 2. Unpublished.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edgaonkar, A., & Chellam, R. (1998). A preliminary study of the ecology of the leopard Panthera pardus fusca in the Sanjay Gandhi National Park, Maharashtra. Dehra Dun: Wildlife Institute of India.

    Google Scholar 

  • Estebanez, J., Gouabault, E., & Michalon, J. (2013). Où sont les animaux? Vers une géographie humanimale. Carnets de géographes, 5 (online).

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster, J., & COE, M. J. (1968). The biomass of game animals in Nairobi National Park, 1960–66. Journal of Zoology, 155(4), 413–425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frykman, J., & Löfgren, O. (1987). Cultural builders: A historical anthropology of middle-class life. Newark: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghosal, S. (2012). Cats in the city: Narrative analysis of the interactions between people and leopards in the Sanjay Gandhi National Park landscape, Mumbai. Mumbai, A Mumbaikars for SGNP project report, http://www.mumbaikarsforsgnp.com/.

  • Ghosal, S., Athreya, V. R., Linnell, J. D. C., & Vedeld, P. O. (2013). An ontological crisis? A review of large felid conservation in India. Biodiversity and Conservation, 22(11), 2665–2681.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guha, R., & Martinez-Alier, J. (1996). Introduction. In R. Guha, & J. Martinez-Alier (Eds.), Varieties of Environmentalism. Essays North and South. London: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haraway, D. J. (2008). When species meet. Minneapolis; London: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, R. P. (1993). Forests: The shadow of civilization. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayward, M. W., Henschel, P., O’Brien, J., Hofmeyr, M., Balme, B., & Kerley, G. I. H. (2006). Prey preferences of the leopard (Panthera pardus). Journal of Zoology, 270, 298–313.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutton, J., Adams, W. M., & Murombedzi, J. C. (2005). Back to the barriers? Changing narratives in biodiversity. Forum for Development Studies, 2, 341–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khorozyan, I., Ghoddousi, A., Soofi, M., & Waltert, M. (2015). Big cats kill more livestock when wild prey reaches a minimum threshold. Biological Conservation, 192, 268–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landy, F. (2017). Urban leopards are good cartographers: Human-nonhuman and spatial conflicts at Sanjay Gandhi National Park, Mumbai. In A. Rademacher & K. Sivaramakrishnan (Eds.), Cities, towns, and the places of nature (pp. 67–85). Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (1993). We have never been modern. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackenzie, J. M. (1988). The empire of nature: Hunting, conservation and british imperialism. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matheka, R. (2005). Antecedents to the community wildlife conservation programme in Kenya, 1946–1964. Environment and History, 11, 239–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mawdsley, E., Mehra, D., & Beazley, K. (2009). Nature lovers, picnickers and bourgeois environmentalism. Economic and Political Weekly, 44(11), 49–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Midgley, M. (1979). Beast and man: The roots of human nature. London; New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neumann, R. P. (2004). Moral and discursive geographies in the war for biodiversity in Africa. Political Geography, 23(7), 813–837.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ogutu, J. O., Owen-Smith, N., Piepho, H.-P., Said, M. Y., Kifugo, S. C., Reid, R. S., et al. (2013). Changing wildlife populations in Nairobi National Park and adjoining Athi-Kaputiei Plains: Collapse of the migratory wildebeest. The Open Conservation Biology Journal, 7, 11–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osano, P. M., Said, M. Y., de Leeuw, J., Ndiwa, N., Kaelo, D., Schomers, S., et al. (2013). Why keep lions instead of livestock? Assessing wildlife tourism-based payment for ecosystem services involving herders in the Maasai Mara. Kenya. Natural Resources Forum, 37(4), 242–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodary, E. (2009). Mobilizing for nature in southern African community-based conservation policies, or the death of the local. Biodiversity and Conservation, 18(10), 2585–2600.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodary, E. (2016). Politiques de connectivité. Conservation de la nature et fin de la modernité en Afrique australe. Habilitation à Diriger des Recherches, University of Grenoble.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez, L. C., Henson, D., Herrero, M., Nkedianye, D., & Reid, R. (2012). Private farmers’ compensation and viability of protected areas: the case of Nairobi National Park and Kitengela dispersal corridor. International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology, 19(1), 34–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, J. C. (1985). Weapons of the weak: Everyday forms of peasant resistance. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sekar, N. (2013). Tolerance for the charismatic marauders: Culture in wildlife conservation. Economic and Political Weekly June 15: 10–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Surve, N. (2015). Ecology of leopard in Sanjay Gandhi National Park, Maharashtra with special reference to its abundance, prey selection and food habit. Mumbai: Wildlife Institute of India; Maharashtra Forest Department, SGNP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tiwari, K. (2008). City Forest Report 2006–07. Mumbai: BNHS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tiwari, K. (2009). Preliminary study on the diet composition of the leopard in Sanjay Gandhi National Park. Mumbai: BNHS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toth, A. B., Lyons, S. K., & Behrensmeyer, A. K. (2014). A century of change in Kenya’s mammal communities: increased richness and decreased uniqueness in six protected areas. PLoS ONE, 9(4), e93092.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Western, D., Russell, S., & Cuthill, I. (2009). The status of wildlife in protected areas compared to non-protected areas of Kenya. PLoS ONE, 4(7), e6140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolch, J. (1998). Zoopolis. In J. Wolch & J. Emel (Eds.), Animal geographies; place, politics and identity in the nature-culture borderlands (pp. 381–404). New York: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolch, J., & Emel, J. (Eds.). (1998). Animal geographies; place, politics and identity in the nature-culture borderlands. New York: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Frédéric Landy .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Landy, F., Rodary, E., Calas, B. (2018). Why Did Leopards Kill Humans in Mumbai but not in Nairobi? Wildlife Management in and Around Urban National Parks. In: Landy, F. (eds) From Urban National Parks to Natured Cities in the Global South. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-8462-1_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-8462-1_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-8461-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-8462-1

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics