Novel Intermolecular Surface Force Unveils the Driving Force of the Actomyosin System

  • Makoto Suzuki
  • George Mogami
  • Takahiro Watanabe
  • Nobuyuki Matubayasi
Chapter

Abstract

In this chapter, we discuss the role of water in actomyosin-force generation. We have been investigating the hydration properties of ions, organic molecules, and proteins. These studies revealed that actin filaments (F-actin) are surrounded by a hyper-mobile water (HMW) layer and restrained water layer, while myosin subfragment 1 (S1) has only a typical restrained hydration layer. The understanding of the physicochemical properties of HMW has been greatly advanced by recent theoretical studies on statistical mechanics and solution chemistry. To explain the mechanism of force generation of actomyosin using ATP hydrolysis, we propose a driving force hypothesis based on novel intermolecular surface force. This hypothesis is consistent with the reported biochemical kinetics and thermodynamic parameters for the primary reaction steps. The gradient field of solvation free energy of S1 is generated in close proximity to F-actin.

Keywords

ATP hydrolysis Electric field effect Hydration free energy Motor protein Protein–water interaction 

References

  1. Asakura S, Oosawa F (1954) On interaction between two bodies immersed in a solution of macromolecules. J. Chem. Phys. 22:1255–1256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bagshaw CR, Trentham DR (1974) The characterization of Myosin-product complexes and of product-release steps during the magnesium ion-dependent adenosine triphosphatase reaction. Biochem J 141:331–349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Best RB, Zhu X, Shim J, Lopes PEM, Mittal J, Feig M, MacKerell Jr AD (2012) Optimization of the additive CHARMM all-atom protein force field targeting improved sampling of the backbone φ, ψ and side-chain χ1 and χ2 dihedral angles. J Chem Theory Comput 8:3257–3273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brooks BR, Bruccoleri RE, Olafson BD, States DJ, Swaminathan S, Karplus M (1983) CHARMM: a program for macromolecular energy, minimization, and dynamics calculations. J Comput Chem 4:187–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brünger A, Brooks IIICL, Karplus M (1984) Stochastic boundary conditions for molecular dynamics simulations of ST2 water. Chem Phys Lett 105:495–500CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chauwin JF, Ajdari A, Prost J (1994) Force-free motion in asymmetric structures: a mechanism without diffusive steps. Europhys Lett 27:421–426CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Edmann KAP (1988) Double hyperbolic force-velocity relation in frog muscle fibers. J Physiol 404:301–321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Egelman EH, Orlova A (1995) New insights into actin filament dynamics. Curr Opin Struct Biol 5:172–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Essmann U, Perera L, Berkowitz ML, Darden T, Lee H, Pedersen JG (1995) A smooth particle mesh Ewald method. J Chem Phys. 103:8577–8593CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Feller SE, Zhang Y, Pastor RW, Brooks BR (1995) Constant pressure molecular dynamics simulation: The Langevin Piston method. J Chem Phys 103:4613–4621CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fiorin G, Klein ML, Hénin J (2013) Using collective variables to drive molecular dynamics simulations. Mol Phys 111:3345–3362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fujii T, Namba K (2017) Structure of actomyosin rigour complex at 5.2 Å resolution and insights into the ATPase cycle mechanism. Nat Commun 8 (1–11):13969CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Galkin VE, Orlova1 A, Schröder GF, Egelman EH (2010) Structural polymorphism in F-actin. Nat Struct Mol Biol 17:1318–1324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Greene LE, Eisenberg E (1980) Dissociation of the Actin ~ Subflagment1 Complex by Adeny1-5’-yl Imidodiphosphate, ADP, and PPi. J Biol Chem 255:543–548PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Hibberd MG, Dantzig JA, Trentham DR, Goldman YE (1985) Phosphate release and force generation in skeletal muscle fibers. Science 228:1317–1319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hirakawa R, Nishikawa Y, Uyeda TQP, Tokuraku K (2017) Unidirectional growth of HMM clusters along actin filaments revealed by real time fluorescence microscopy. Cytoskeleton 74:482–489.  https://doi.org/10.1002/cm.21408CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Hornak V, Abel R, Okur A, Strockbine B, Roitberg A, Simmerling C (2006) Comparison of multiple Amber force fields and development of improved protein backbone parameters. Proteins Struct Funct, Bioinf 65:712–725CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Inoue A, Tonomura Y (1980) Dissociation of Acto ~ H-Meromyosin and That of Acto-Subfragment-l Induced by Adenyl-5’-yl-imidodiphosphate: Evidence for a Ternary Complex of F-Actin, Myosin Head, and Substrate. J Biochem 88:1643–1651CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ishijima A, Doi T, Sakurada K, Yanagida T (1991) Sub-piconewton force fluctuations of actomyosin in vitro. Nature 352:301–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Jorgensen WL, Chandrasekhar J, Madura JD, Impey RW, Klein ML (1983) Comparison of simple potential functions for simulating liquid water. J Chem Phys 79:926–935CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kabir SR, Yokoyama K, Mihashi K, Kodama T, Suzuki M (2003) Hyper-mobile water is induced around actin filaments. Biophys J 85:3154–3161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Karino Y, Matubayasi N (2011) Communication: free-energy analysis of hydration effect on protein with explicit solvent: equilibrium fluctuation of cytochrome c. J Chem Phys 134(1–11):041105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kawai M, Halvorson HR (1991) Two step mechanism of phosphate release and the mechanism of force generation in chemically skinned fibers of rabbit psoas muscle. Biophys J 59:329–342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kinoshita M (2009) Importance of translational entropy of water in biological self-assembly processes like protein folding. Int J Mol Sci 10:1064–1080CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kinoshita M, Suzuki M (2009) A statistical-mechanical analysis on the hypermobile water around a large solute with high surface charge density. J Chem Phys 130(1–11):014707CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kitamura K, Tokunaga M, Iwane AH, Yanagida T (1999) A single myosin head moves along an actin filament with regular steps of 5.3 nanometres. Nature 397(6715):129–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kodama T (1985) Thermodynamic analysis on muscle ATPase mechanisms. Physiol Rev 65:467–551CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kubota Y, Yoshimori A, Matubayasi N, Suzuki M, Akiyama R (2012) Molecular dynamics study of fast dielectric relaxation of water around a molecular-sized ion. J Chem Phys 137(1–4):224502CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lawson JD, Pate E, Rayment I, Yount RG (2004) Molecular dynamics analysis of structural factors influencing the Pi-release tunnel in myosin. Biophys J 86:3794–3803CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. MacKerell AD Jr, Bashford D, Bellott M, Dunbrack RL Jr, Evanseck JD, Field MJ, Fischer S, Gao J, Guo H, Ha S et al (1998) All-atom empirical potential for molecular modeling and dynamics studies of proteins. J Phys Chem B 102:3586–3616CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Margossian SS, Lowey S (1982) Preparation of myosin and its subfragments from rabbit skeletal muscle. San Diego, California: Elsevier, Inc. Methods Enzymol 85 Pt B:55–71Google Scholar
  32. Martyna GJ, Tobias DJ, Klein ML (1994) Constant pressure molecular dynamics algorithms. J Chem Phys 101:4177–4189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Miyamoto S, Kollman PA (1992) SETTLE: an analytical version of the SHAKE and RATTLE algorithm for rigid water models. J Comput Chem 13:952–962CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Miyazaki T, Wazawa T, Mogami G, Kodama T, Suzuki M (2008) Measurement of the dielectric relaxation property of water-ion loose complex in aqueous solutions of salt at low concentrations. J Phys Chem A 112:10801–10806CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Mogami G, Wazawa T, Morimoto N, Kodama T, Suzuki M (2011) Hydration properties of adenosine phosphate series as studied by microwave dielectric spectroscopy. Biophys Chem 154:1–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Mogami G, Miyazaki T, Wazawa T, Matubayasi N, Suzuki M (2013) Anion-dependence of fast relaxation component in Na-, K-halide solutions at low concentrations measured by high-resolution microwave dielectric spectroscopy. J Phys Chem A 117:4851–4862CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Mogami G, Suzuki M, Matubayasi N (2016) Spatial-decomposition analysis of energetics of ionic hydration. J Phys Chem B 120:1813–1821CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Muretta JM, Petersen KJ, Thomas DD (2013) Direct real-time detection of the actin-activated power stroke within the myosin catalytic domain. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110:7211–7216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Muretta JM, Rohde JA, Johnsrud DO, Cornea S, Thomas DD (2015) Direct real-time detection of the structural and biochemical events in the myosin powerstroke. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 112:14272–14277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Ngo KX, Kodera N, Katayama E, Ando T, Uyeda TQP (2015) Cofilin-induced unidirectional cooperative conformational changes in actin filaments revealed by high-speed atomic force microscopy. eLife(1–22):4:e04806Google Scholar
  41. Oda T, Maeda Y (2010) Multiple conformations of F-actin. Structure 18:761–767CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Oobatake M, Ooi T (1988) Characteristic thermodynamic properties of hydrated water for 20 amino acid residues in globular proteins. J Biochem 104:433–439CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Oobatake M, Ooi T (1993) Hydration and heat stability effects on protein unfolding. Prog Biophys Mol Biol 59:237–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Ohno T, Kodama T (1991) Kinetics of adenosine triphosphate hydrolysis by shortening myofibrils from rabbit psoas muscle. J Physiol 441:685–702CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Phillips JC, Braun R, Wang W, Gumbart J, Tajkhorshid E, Villa E, Chipot C, Skeel RD, Kale L, Schulten K (2005) Scalable molecular dynamics with NAMD. J Comput Chem 26:1781–1802CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Prochniewicz E, Thomas DD (1997) Perturbations of functional interactions with myosin induce long-range allosteric and cooperative structural changes in actin. Biochemistry 36:12845–12853CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Sakuraba S, Matubayasi N (2014) ERmod: fast and versatile computation software for solvation free energy with approximate theory of solutions. J Comp Chem 35:1592–1608CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Siddique MSP, Mogami G, Miyazaki T, Katayama E, Uyeda TQP, Suzuki M (2005) Cooperative structural change of actin filaments interacting with activated myosin motor domain, detected with copolymers of pyrene-labeled actin and acto-S1 chimera protein. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 337:1185–1191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Spudich JA, Watt S (1971) The regulation of rabbit skeletal muscle contraction. 1. Biochemical studies of the interaction of the tropomyosin-troponin complex with actin and the proteolytic fragments of myosin. J Biol Chem 246:4866–4871PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Stein LA, Chock PB, Eisenberg E (1981) Mechanism of the actomyosin ATPase: effect of actin on ATP hydrolysis step. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 78:1346–1350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Stein LA, Chock PB, Eisenberg E (1984) The rate-limiting step in the actomyosin adenosinetriphosphate cycle. Biochemistry 23:1555–1563CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Suzuki M (1994) New concept of a hydrophobicity motor based on local hydrophobicity transition of functional polymer substrate for micro/nano machines. Polym Gels Networks 2:279–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Suzuki M, Shigematsu J, Kodama T (1996) Hydration study of proteins in solution by microwave dielectric analysis. J Phys Chem 100:7279–7282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Suzuki M (2004) Actomyosin motor mechanism: affinity gradient surface force model. Prog Coll Polym Sci 125:38–41Google Scholar
  55. Suzuki M, Kabir SR, Siddique MSP, Nazia US, Miyazaki T, Kodama T (2004) Myosin-induced volume increase of the hyper-mobile water surrounding actin filaments. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 322:340–346CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Suzuki M (2014) What is “hypermobile” water?: detected in alkali halide, adenosine phosphate and F-actin solutions by high-resolution microwave dielectric spectroscopy. Pure Appl Chem 86:181–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Suzuki M, Imao A, Mogami G, Chishima R, Watanabe T, Yamaguchi T, Morimoto N, Wazawa T (2016) Strong dependence of hydration state of F-actin on the bound Mg2+/Ca2+ ions. J Phys Chem B 120:6917–6928CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Suzuki M, Mogami G, Ohsugi H, Watanabe T, Matubayasi N (2017) Physical driving force of actomyosin motility based on the hydration effect. Cytoskeleton 74:512–527.  https://doi.org/10.1002/cm.21417CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Szent-Gyorgyi A (1951) Nature of the contraction of muscle. Nature 4245(1951):380–381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Szent-Gyorgyi A (1956) Bioenerg Sci 124:873–875Google Scholar
  61. Takagi Y, Shuman H, Goldman YE (2004) Coupling between phosphate release and force generation in muscle actomyosin. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 359:1913–1920CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Takashima S (2002) Electric dipole moments of globular proteins: measurement and calculation with NMR and X-ray databases. J Non-Cryst Solids 305:303–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Taylor EW (1977) Transient phase of adenosine triphosphate hydrolysis by myosin, heavy meromyosin, and head. Biochemistry 17:732–740CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. UCSF Chimera. http://www.cgl.ucsf.edu/chimera/. Accessed 18 July 2017
  65. Van Gunsteren WF, Berendsen HJC (1988) A Leap-frog algorithm for stochastic dynamics. Mol Simul 1:173–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Volkmann N, Ouyang G, Trybus KM, DeRosier DJ, Lowey S, Hanein D (2003) Myosin isoforms show unique conformations in the actin-bound state. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 100:3227–3232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Wazawa T, Sagawa T, Ogawa T, Morimoto N, Suzuki M (2011) Hyper-mobility of water around actin filaments revealed using pulse-field gradient spin-echo 1H-NMR and fluorescence spectroscopy. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 404:985–990CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Webb MR, Hibberd MG, Goldman YE, Trentham DR (1986) Oxygene exchange between Pi in the medium and water during ATP hydrolysis mediated by skinned fibers from rabbit skeletal muscle: evidence for Pi binding to a force-generating state. J Biol Chem 261:15557–15564PubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. Woledge RC, Curtin NA, Homsher E (1985) Energetic aspects of muscle contraction, Chap 3. Academic Press, London, pp 119–165Google Scholar
  70. Yamamori Y, Ishizuka R, Karino Y, Sakuraba S, Matubayasi N (2016) Interaction-component analysis of the hydration and urea effects on cytochrome c. J Chem Phys 144:085102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Yanagida T, Arata T, Oosawa F (1985) Sliding distance of actin filament induced by a myosin crossbridge during one ATP hydrolysis cycle. Nature 316:366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Yokoyama K, Kamei T, Minami H, Suzuki H (2001) Hydration study of globular proteins by microwave dielectric spectroscopy. J Phys Chem B 105:12622–12627CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Makoto Suzuki
    • 1
    • 2
  • George Mogami
    • 3
  • Takahiro Watanabe
    • 3
  • Nobuyuki Matubayasi
    • 4
    • 5
  1. 1.Biological and Molecular Dynamics, Institute of Multidisciplinary Research for Advanced Materials (IMRAM)Tohoku UniversitySendaiJapan
  2. 2.Department of Biomolecular Engineering, Graduate School of EngineeringTohoku UniversitySendaiJapan
  3. 3.Department of Materials Processing, Graduate School of EngineeringTohoku UniversitySendaiJapan
  4. 4.Division of Chemical Engineering, Graduate School of Engineering ScienceOsaka UniversityToyonakaJapan
  5. 5.Elements Strategy Initiative for Catalysts and BatteriesKyoto UniversityKatsuraJapan

Personalised recommendations