All-Atom Analysis of Free Energy of Protein Solvation Through Molecular Simulation and Solution Theory

Chapter

Abstract

Solvation affects the protein structure strongly, and its effect is quantified by the solvation free energy in statistical thermodynamics. In the present chapter, a fast and accurate method of computation is introduced for the free energy of protein solvation with explicit solvent. The application of the method is then presented for the equilibrium fluctuation in pure-water solvent and the effect of urea on the protein structure. The roles of the solvent water and the urea cosolvent are discussed from the standpoint of energetics, and it is seen that the variation of the protein structural energy is induced and compensated by the solvent water during the course of equilibrium fluctuation. The unfolding mechanism of added urea is also addressed in terms of the energetics of transfer of the protein solute from pure-water solvent to the urea–water mixed solvent, and an extended structure of protein is shown to be favored through the direct, van der Waals interaction between the protein and urea.

Keywords

Solvation Free energy Solution theory Molecular dynamics simulation Cosolvent 

References

  1. Åqvist J, Medina C, Samuelsson JE (1994) A new method for predicting binding affinity in computer-aided drug design. Prot Eng 7:385–391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bushnell GW, Louie GV, Brayer GD (1990) High-resolution three-dimensional structure of horse heart cytochrome c. J Mol Biol 214:585–595CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Canchi DR, García AE (2011) Backbone and side-chain contributions in protein denaturation by urea. Biophys J 100:1526–1533CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Canchi DR, García AE (2013) Cosolvent effects on protein stability. Annu Rev Phys Chem 64:273–293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Canchi DR, Paschek D, García AE (2010) Equilibrium study of protein denaturation by urea. J Am Chem Soc 132:2338–2344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Carlson HA, Jorgensen WL (1995) An extended linear response method for determining free energies of hydration. J Phys Chem 99:10667–10673CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chuev GN, Fedorov MV, Crain J (2007) Improved estimates for hydration free energy obtained by the reference interaction site model. Chem Phys Lett 448:198–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Date A, Ishizuka R, Matubayasi N (2016) Energetics of nonpolar and polar compounds in cationic, anionic, and nonionic micelles studied by all-atom molecular dynamics simulation combined with a theory of solutions. Phys Chem Chem Phys 18:13223–13231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fdez Galván I, Sánchez ML, Martín ME, Olivares del Valle FJ, Aguilar MA (2003) Geometry optimization of molecules in solution: joint use of the mean field approximation and the free-energy gradient method. J Chem Phys 118:255–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Freedman H, Truong TN (2004) Coupled reference interaction site model/simulation approach for thermochemistry of solvation: theory and prospects. J Chem Phys 121:2187–2198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Frolov AI (2015) Accurate calculation of solvation free energies in supercritical fluids by fully atomistic simulations: probing the theory of solutions in energy representation. J Chem Theory Comput 11:2245–2256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Frolov AI, Ratkova EL, Palmer DS, Fedorov MV (2011) Hydration thermodynamics using the reference interaction site model: speed or accuracy? J Phys Chem B 115:6011–6022CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Harris RC, Deng N, Levy RM, Ishizuka R, Matubayasi N (2017) Computing conformational free energy differences in explicit solvent: an efficient thermodynamic cycle using an auxiliary potential and a free energy functional constructed from the end points. J Comp Chem 38:1198–1208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Horinek D, Netz RR (2011) Can simulations quantitatively predict peptide transfer free energies to urea solutions? Thermodynamic concepts and force field limitations. J Phys Chem A 115:6125–6136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hornak V, Abel R, Okur A, Strockbine B, Roitberg A, Simmerling C (2006) Comparison of multiple amber force fields and development of improved protein backbone parameters. Proteins 65:712–725CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hua L, Zhou R, Thirumalai D, Berne BJ (2008) Urea denaturation by stronger dispersion interactions with proteins than water implies a 2-stage unfolding. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105:16928–16933CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ikeguchi M, Nakamura S, Shimizu K (2001) Molecular dynamics study on hydrophobic effects in aqueous urea solutions. J Am Chem Soc 123:677–682CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Imai T, Harano Y, Kinoshita M, Kovalenko A, Hirata F (2006) A theoretical analysis on hydration thermodynamics of proteins. J Chem Phys 125:024911 (7 pp)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ishizuka R, Matubayasi N, Tu KM, Umebayashi Y (2015) Energetic contributions from the cation and anion to the stability of carbon dioxide dissolved in imidazolium-based ionic liquids. J Phys Chem B 119:1579–1587CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Jorgensen WL, Chandrasekhar J, Madura JD, Impey RW, Klein ML (1983) Comparison of simple potential functions for simulating liquid water. J Chem Phys 79:926–935CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Jorgensen WL, Maxwell DS, Tirado-Rives J (1996) Development and testing of the OPLS all-atom force field on conformational energetics and properties of organic liquids. J Am Chem Soc 118:11225–11236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kamo F, Ishizuka R, Matubayasi N (2016) Correlation analysis for heat denaturation of Trp-cage miniprotein with explicit solvent. Protein Sci 25:56–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Karino Y, Matubayasi N (2011) Free-energy analysis of hydration effect on protein with explicit solvent: equilibrium fluctuation of cytochrome c. J Chem Phys 134:041105 (4 pp)Google Scholar
  24. Karino Y, Matubayasi N (2013) Interaction-component analysis of the urea effect on amino acid analogs. Phys Chem Chem Phys 15:4377–4391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Karino Y, Fedorov MV, Matubayasi N (2010) End-point calculation of solvation free energy of amino-acid analogs by molecular theories of solution. Chem Phys Lett 496:351–355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kast SM (2001) Combinations of simulation and integral equation theory. Phys Chem Chem Phys 3:5087–5092CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kawakami T, Shigemoto I, Matubayasi N (2012) Free-energy analysis of water affinity in polymer studied by atomistic molecular simulation combined with the theory of solutions in the energy representation. J Chem Phys 137:234903 (9 pp). Erratum (2014) J Chem Phys 140:169903 (2 pp)Google Scholar
  28. Kinoshita M (2013) A new theoretical approach to biological self-assembly. Biophys Rev 5:283–293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kokubo H, Hu CY, Pettitt BM (2011) Peptide conformational preferences in osmolyte solutions: transfer free energies of decaalanine. J Am Chem Soc 133:1849–1858CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kokubo H, Harris RC, Asthagiri D, Pettitt BM (2013) Solvation free energies of alanine peptides: the effect of flexibility. J. Phys. Chem. B 117:16428–16435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Levy RM, Belhadj M, Kitchen DB (1991) Gaussian fluctuation formula for electrostatic free-energy changes in solution. J Chem Phys 95:3627–3633CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lindgren M, Westlund PO (2010) On the stability of chymotrypsin inhibitor 2 in a 10 M urea solution: the role of interaction energies for urea-induced protein denaturation. Phys Chem Chem Phys 12:9358–9366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Luzhkov V, Warshel A (1992) Microscopic models for quantum mechanical calculations of chemical processes in solutions: LD/AMPAC and SCAAS/AMPAC calculations of solvation energies. J Comput Chem 13:199–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Matubayasi N, Nakahara M (2000) Theory of solutions in the energetic representation. I. Formulation. J Chem Phys 113:6070–6081CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Matubayasi N, Nakahara M (2002) Theory of solutions in the energy representation. II. Functional for the chemical potential. J Chem Phys 117:3605–3616. Erratum (2003) J Chem Phys 118:2446Google Scholar
  36. Matubayasi N, Nakahara M (2003) Theory of solutions in the energy representation. III. Treatment of the molecular flexibility. J Chem Phys 119:9686–9702CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Matubayasi N, Liang KK, Nakahara M (2006) Free-energy analysis of solubilization in micelle. J Chem Phys 124:154908 (13 pp)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Matubayasi N, Shinoda W, Nakahara M (2008) Free-energy analysis of the molecular binding into lipid membrane with the method of energy representation. J Chem Phys 128:195107 (13 pp)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Mizukami T, Saito H, Kawamoto S, Miyakawa T, Iwayama M, Takasu M, Nagao H (2012) Solvation effect on the structural change of a globular protein: a molecular dynamics study. Int J Quant Chem 112:344–350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Moeser B, Horinek D (2014) Unified description of urea denaturation: backbone and side chains contribute equally in the transfer model. J Phys Chem B 118:107–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Neidigh JW, Fesinmeyer RM, Andersen NH (2002) Designing a 20-residue protein. Nat Struct Mol Biol 9:425–430CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Paul S, Paul S (2015) Exploring the counteracting mechanism of trehalose on urea conferred protein denaturation: a molecular dynamics simulation study. J Phys Chem B 119:9820–9834CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Rose DR, Phipps J, Michniewicz J, Birnbaum GI, Ahmed FR, Muir A, Anderson WF, Narang S (1988) Crystal structure of T4-lysozyme generated from synthetic coding DNA expressed in Escherichia coli. Protein Eng Des Sel 2:277–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Saito H, Iwayama M, Mizukami T, Kang J, Tateno M, Nagao H (2013) Molecular dynamics study on binding free energy of Azurin-Cytochrome c551 complex. Chem Phys Lett 556:297–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Sakuraba S, Matubayasi N (2014) ERmod: Fast and versatile computation software for solvation free energy with approximate theory of solutions. J Comput Chem 35:1592–1608CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Shirts MR, Pande VS (2005) Solvation free energies of amino acid side chain analogs for common molecular mechanics water models. J Chem Phys 122:134508 (12 pp)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Stumpe MC, Grubmüller H (2007) Interaction of urea with amino acids: implications for urea-induced protein denaturation. J Am Chem Soc 129:16126–16131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Takahashi H, Matubayasi N, Nakahara M, Nitta T (2004) A quantum chemical approach to the free energy calculations in condensed systems: the QM/MM method combined with the theory of energy representation. J Chem Phys 121:3989–3999CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Takahashi H, Ohno H, Kishi R, Nakano M, Matubayasi N (2008) Computation of the free energy change associated with one-electron reduction of coenzyme immersed in water: a novel approach within the framework of the quantum mechanical/molecular mechanical method combined with the theory of energy representation. J Chem Phys 129:205103 (14 pp)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Takemura K, Guo H, Sakuraba S, Matubayasi N, Kitao A (2012) Evaluation of protein-protein docking model structures using all-atom molecular dynamics simulations combined with the solution theory in the energy representation. J Chem Phys 137:215105 (10 pp)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. van der Vegt NFA, Trzesniak D, Kasumaj B, van Gunsteren WF (2004) Energy-entropy compensation in the transfer of nonpolar solutes from water to cosolvent/water mixtures. ChemPhysChem 5:144–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Vener MV, Leontyev IV, Dyakov YuA, Basilevsky MV, Newton MD (2002) Application of the linearized MD approach for computing equilibrium solvation free energies of charged and dipolar solutes in polar solvents. J Phys Chem B 106:13078–13088CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Weber V, Asthagiri D (2012) Regularizing binding energy distributions and the hydration free energy of protein cytochrome c from all-atom simulations. J Chem Theory Comput 8:3409–3415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Wolfenden R, Andersson L, Cullis PM, Southgate CCB (1981) Affinities of amino acid side chains for solvent water. Biochemistry 20:849–855CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Yamamori Y, Matubayasi N (2017) Interaction-component analysis of the effects of urea and its alkylated derivatives on the structure of T4-lysozyme. J Chem Phys 146:225103 (13 pp)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Yamamori Y, Ishizuka R, Karino Y, Sakuraba S, Matubayasi N (2016) Interaction-component analysis of the hydration and urea effects on cytochrome c. J Chem Phys 144:085102 (14 pp)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Yamamoto T (2008) Variational and perturbative formulations of quantum mechanical/molecular mechanical free energy with mean-field embedding and its analytical gradients. J Chem Phys 129:244104 (15 pp)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Division of Chemical Engineering, Graduate School of Engineering ScienceOsaka UniversityToyonaka, OsakaJapan
  2. 2.Elements Strategy Initiative for Catalysts and BatteriesKyoto UniversityKatsura, KyotoJapan

Personalised recommendations