Advertisement

Against the Flow: Challenges in Tourism Development for a Small-Border Town in Thailand

  • Chachaya Yodsuwan
  • Piyatida Pianluprasidh
  • Ken Butcher
Chapter
Part of the Perspectives on Asian Tourism book series (PAT)

Abstract

While management of cross-border tourism destinations has been of considerable interest to policy makers and tourism scholars for a long time, less attention has been given to Asian tourism destinations. A region well known worldwide is the Golden Triangle which shares its borders with Laos, Thailand and Myanmar. This chapter identifies key tourism planning issues, through interviews and a survey of key stakeholders, faced by a small town on the Thai side of the border – Chiang Saen. This tourist destination in Thailand draws local and international tourists because of its proximity to the Golden Triangle. Four broad issues restricting tourism development for Chiang Saen were identified: a complex web of stakeholders, powerful vested interests, a lack of identity or planning direction, and weak market attractiveness. Core Thai values of fatalism, relationship building, harmony and hierarchy contribute to the existence of these planning issues and constrain problem resolution. Furthermore, western style recommendations for planning development are likely to be ineffective. However, suggestions that leverage Thai values have potential to assist local tourism planning.

Keywords

Cultural values Stakeholder complexity Power relations Destination attractiveness Future uncertainty 

References

  1. Amante, M. (2013). Recovering the paradox of the border: Identity and (Un)familiarity across the Portuguese–Spanish border. European Planning Studies, 21(1), 24–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Blasco, D., Guia, J., & Prats, L. (2014). Emergence of governance in cross-border destinations. Annals of Tourism Research, 49, 159–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bramwell, B., & Sharman, A. (1999). Collaboration in local tourism policymaking. Annals of Tourism Research, 26(2), 392–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Buhalis, D. (2000). Marketing the competitive destination of the future. Tourism Management, 21, 97–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Gelbman, A., & Timothy, D. (2011). Border complexity, tourism and international exclaves. Annals of Tourism Research, 38(1), 110–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Haugland, S., Gronseth, H., & Aarstad, J. (2011). Development of tourism destinations. Annals of Tourism Research, 38(1), 268–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ilbery, B., & Saxena, G. (2011). Integrated rural tourism in the English-Welsh cross-border region: An analysis of strategic, administrative and personal challenges. Regional Studies, 45(8), 1139–1155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ioannides, D., Nielsen, P. A., & Billing, P. (2006). Transboundary collaboration in tourism: The case of the Bothnian Arc. Tourism Geographic: An international Journal of Tourism Space, Place and Environment, 8(2), 122–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Jamal, T., & Getz, D. (1995). Collaboration theory and community tourism planning. Annals of Tourism Research, 22(1), 186–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Jordan, L. (2007). Interorganisational relationships in small Twin-Island developing states in the Caribbean – The role of the internal core-periphery model: The case of Trinidad and Tobago. Current Issues in Tourism, 10(1), 1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Knutson, T., Komolsevin, R., Chatietu, P., & Smith, V. (2003). A cross-cultural comparison of Thai and US American rhetorical sensitivity: Implications for intercultural communication. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 27, 63–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Komin, S. (1990). Culture and work-related values in Thai organizations. International Journal of Psychology, 25, 681–704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lovelock, B., & Boyd, S. (2006). Impediments to a cross-border collaborative model of destination Management in the Catlins, New Zealand. Tourism Geographies, 8(2), 143–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Martinez, O. (1994). The dynamics of border interaction: New approaches to border analysis. In C. H. Schofield (Ed.), Global boundaries: World boundaries (Vol. 1, pp. 1–22). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  15. McKercher, R. (1999). A chaos approach to tourism. Tourism Management, 20, 425–434.Google Scholar
  16. Niffeenegger, P., Kulviwat, S., & Engchanil, N. (2006). Conflicting cultural imperatives in Modern Thailand: Global perspectives. Asia Pacific Business Review, 12(4), 403–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Spierings, B., & van der Velde, M. (2013). Cross-border mobility, unfamiliarity and development policy in Europe. European Planning Studies, 21(1), 1–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Timothy, D. J. (1995). Political boundaries and tourism: Borders as tourism attractions. Tourism Management, 16(7), 525–532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Timothy, D. (2000). Tourism and international parks. In R. Butler & S. Boyd (Eds.), Tourism and National Parks: Issues and implications (pp. 263–282). Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  20. Timpa, N. (2012). Amazing Thailand: Organizational culture in the Thai public sector. International Business Research, 5(11), 35–42.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Chachaya Yodsuwan
    • 1
  • Piyatida Pianluprasidh
    • 1
  • Ken Butcher
    • 2
  1. 1.School of ManagementMae Fah Luang UniversityMueang Chiang RaiThailand
  2. 2.Department of Tourism, Sport and Hotel ManagementGriffith UniversityQLDAustralia

Personalised recommendations