Computation of Dynamic Signal Phases for Vehicular Traffic

  • Rajendra S. ParmarEmail author
  • Bhushan H. Trivedi
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems book series (LNNS, volume 38)


Traffic congestion is one of the significant contributors to global warming and a major factor deteriorating logistic efficiency, thereby impeding efficiencies and economy. Infrastructure expansion and improvements render a short-lived solution. Significant improvisation is achieved only through technological approach to the problems with challenges in signaling shortest route and ensuring fair treatment to all the directions without a deadlock-like situation. One of the firsts to address is signaling electronics. Signaling electronics are not maintained. Besides, traffic signals do not align with the traffic patterns. Traffic congestion is characterized as dynamic, stochastic, random, and unpredictable phenomenon. Consequently, traffic congestion cannot be addressed by static, predetermined signal phases, preprogrammed periodically changing signals based on a prior knowledge of traffic behavior as the dynamically changing traffic pattern will dislocate and disrupt the assumptions of traffic changes. Hence traffic signals have to be devised to adapt to changes as per the traffic situation. Secondly, signaling electronics is oblivious to vehicle densities, intended direction of travel, and available capacity on road ahead to accommodate oncoming vehicles. This leads to a green phase resulting in deadlock situation. The paper describes exploring utilization of green phases for other directions while maintaining exclusive and non-conflicting movement with other directions. The paper proposes computation of dynamic signal phases while ensuring fair assignment to other directions and avoidance of deadlock situations.


Traffic signals Intelligent traffic signals Dynamic traffic signal assignment 


  1. 1.
    Kittelson & Associates, Inc. (2008) Texas Transportation Institute, University of Maryland, Siemens ITS, Purdue University, & the Institute of Transportation Engineers, June 2008, Signal timing manualGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Irwin WC (1977) Planning and construction of a computerized traffic control system. Chattanooga, TennesseeGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Xiaohong L, Shuhua R, Lan S (2008) A new traffic signal coordinated control method based on mobile agent technology. In: Proceedings of the 27th chinese control conference, Kunming, Yunnan, China, Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Dalian Polytech University, Dalian 116034, P. R. ChinaGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Zhang W, Tan G, Ding N, Wang G (2012) Traffic congestion evaluation and signal control optimization based on wireless sensor networks: model and algorithms (School of Computer Science and Technology, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian, ChinazbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
  6. 6.
    List GF, Cetin M (2004) Modeling traffic signal control using Petri Nets. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst 5(3)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    dos Santos Soares M, Vrancken J (2008) Responsive traffic signals designed with Petri Nets. In: IEEE international conference on systems, man and cybernetics (SMC)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chin YK, Kow WY, Khong WL, Tan MK, Teo KTK (2012) Q-learning traffic signal optimization within multiple intersections traffic network. In: UK Sim-AMSS 6th european modeling symposium, modeling, simulation & computing laboratory, material & mineral research unit. School of Engineering and Information Technology, University Malaysia Sabah, Kota Kinabalu, MalaysiaGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Anokye M, Abdul-Aziz AR, Annin K, Oduro FT (2013) Application of queuing theory to vehicular traffic at signalized intersection in Kumasi-Ashanti Region, Ghana. Am Int J Contemp Res 3(7)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Komada K, Nagatani T (2009) Modeling and simulation for vehicular traffic in city network controlled by signals. TIC-STH, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Shizuoka University, Hamamatsu, JapanGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Parmar RS, Trivedi B (2017) Modulating traffic signal phases to realize real-time traffic control system. J Transp Technol 7(1):26–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Zhou B (2013) A real-time traffic-responsive strategy for road congestion problem. In: 2013 international conference on computational and information sciences. IEEE. College of Information Science and Technology, Zhejiang Shuren University, Hangzhou, China.
  13. 13.
    Wenjie C, Lifeng C, Zhanglong C, Shiliang TU (2005) A real time dynamic traffic control system based on wireless sensor network. In: Proceedings of the 2005 international conference on parallel processing workshops (ICPPW’05). IEEEGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lan C-L, Chang G-L (2015) A traffic signal optimization model for intersections experiencing heavy scooter–vehicle mixed traffic flows. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst 16(4) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Zhang W, Tan G, Ding N, Wang G (2012) Traffic congestion evaluation and signal control optimization based on wireless sensor networks: model and algorithms. In: Mathematical problems in engineering. Hindawi Publishing Corporation, vol 2012, Article ID 573171, 17p. School of Computer Science and Technology, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian, China. Scholar
  16. 16.
    Chang J-J, Li Y-H, Liao W, Chang, I-C (2012) Intersection based routing for urban vehicular communication with traffic light consideration. IEEE Wirel CommunGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Yinfei L (2009) Research on synchronizing traffic signals for an Urban arterial road. In: Third international symposium on intelligent information technology application. School of Statistics and Mathematics, Zhejiang Gongshang University, Hangzhou, ChinaGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Dotoli M, Fanti MP, Meloni C (2004) Coordination and real time optimization of signal timing plans for urban traffic control. In: Proceedings of the 2004 IEEE international conference on networking, sensing 8 control, 21–23 Mar 2004Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Borkar P, Malik LG (2013) Speed range prediction for subsequent intersections. In: Proceedings of 7th international conference on intelligent systems and control (ISCO)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hu Z, Motani M (2012) DVS: a distributed virtual signboard for information dissemination and preservation in vehicular networks. In: 15th international IEEE conference on intelligent transportation systems, Anchorage, Alaska, USA, 16–19 Sept 2012Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Dong L, Chen W (2010) Real-time traffic signal timing for urban road multi-intersection. Intell Inf Manag 2:483–486. College of Mechanical Engineering, Shanghai University of Engineering Science, Shanghai, China.
  22. 22.
    Ran Q, Yang J (2012) A novel closed-loop feedback traffic signal control strategy at an isolated intersection. In: 2012 IEEE international conference on information science and technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China, 23–25 Mar 2012Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kponyo JJ, Kuang Y, Li Z (2012) Real time status collection and dynamic vehicular traffic control using ant colony optimization. In: 2012 international conference on computational problem-solving (ICCP), Oct 2012Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Shladover SE, Li J-Q (2011) Evaluation of probe vehicle sampling strategies for traffic signal control. In: 2011 14th international IEEE conference on intelligent transportation systems, Washington, DC, USA, 5–7 Oct 2011Google Scholar
  25. 25.
  26. 26.
  27. 27.
  28. 28.
    Shelby SG, Bullock DM, Gettman D, Ghaman RS, Sabra ZA, Soyke N (2008) An overview and performance evaluation of ACS lite—a low cost adaptive signal control system. Submitted to the 87th TRB annual meeting in Washington, DC, Jan 2008Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    RHODES—real time hierarchical optimized distributed effective system (2008).
  30. 30.
    Parmar RS, Trivedi B (2014) Identification of parameters and sensor technology for vehicular traffic—a survey. IJTTE Int J Traffic Transp Eng 3(2):101–106Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Parmar RS, Trivedi B (2014) Real time computation of optimal signal timing to maximize vehicular throughput for a traffic junction. In: 3rd international conference on eco-friendly computing and communication systems (ICECCS 2014). NITK Surathkal, Mangalore, India, pp 194–199, 8–21 Dec 2014Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Parmar RS, Trivedi B (2017) Shortest alternate path discovery through recursive bounding box pruning. J Transp Technol 1–14Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.GTU, Gujarat Technology UniversityAhmedabadIndia
  2. 2.GLS Institute of Computer TechnologyAhmedabadIndia

Personalised recommendations