Skip to main content

How Does Land Finance Affect Economic Growth in China?

Mathematical Model Analysis and Empirical Analysis on Provincial Panel Data

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
A New Era
  • 341 Accesses

Abstract

Land finance, as the local governments’ policy to collect revenue in China, is considered to be related with the economic growth. In recent years, whether land finance is contributing to economic growth and how land finance affects economic growth have been attracting more and more attention of the researchers. In this chapter, the economy is divided into two sectors—traditional Malthus section and modern Solow sector under the framework of the New-Classical Theory of Economic Growth. The effect of land finance on economic growth in China is derived via mathematical method based on economic growth model. The result shows that land finance will transfer the labor from the Malthus sector to the Solow sector, which will induce the economic growth. This chapter uses the panel data analysis of 30 provinces during 2004–2013 to test the above result. It finds that reducing the rural land and raising the land lease price have promoted the economic growth. The labor transfer from the Malthus sector to the Solow sector caused by land finance do more contribution to economic growth than reducing the rural land and raising the land lease price.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Source: Ministry of Finance of the People’s Republic of China, http://gks.mof.gov.cn/zhengfuxinxi/tongjishuju/201501/t20150130_1186487.html.

  2. 2.

    Source: China Statistical Yearbook.

  3. 3.

    If the used land is directly included in the model as an explanatory variable, land, a factor of production, might influence the economic output due to some intangible factors, thus causing endogenetic problems, and this has been proved by the Haqusman test. Therefore, when measuring the influence of land on economic growth, we process this explanatory variable and use the average real value of rural land as an explanatory variable.

  4. 4.

    The result is the land transfer revenue divided by land area.

References

  • Cobb, C., & Douglas, P. (1928). A theory of production. The American Economic Review, 18 (1), 139–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deng, X., Huang, J., Rozelle, S., & Uchida, E. (2010). Economic growth and the expansion of urban land in China. Urban Studies, 47 (4), 813–843.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ding, C., & Lichtenberg, E. (2011). Land and urban economic growth in China. Journal of Regional Science, 51 (2), 299–317.

    Google Scholar 

  • Du, X. J., Huang, Z. H., & Wu, C. F (2009). Land finance and economic growth in China—Analysis based on provincial panel data. Finance & Trade Economies (Caimao Jingji), 1, 60–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feng, L., Wei, L., & Jiang, Y. (2008). Study on the contribution of land element to economic growth in China. China Land Science (Zhongguo Tudi Kexue), 22 (12), 4–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gong, R. K. (2012). Tax-share reform, fiscal decentralization and housing price. Economic Theory and Business Management (Jingji Lilun Yu Jingji Guanli), 4, 45–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, J., & Jowsey, E. (2004). Urban land economics (6th edition), Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Homburg, S. (1991). Interest and growth in an economy with Land. The Canadian Journal of Economics, 24 (2), 450–459.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiang, X. S., Liu, S. Y., & Li, Q. (2007). The land reform and economic growth. Management World (Guanli Shijie), 9, 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiang, Z. (2014). Industrialization, local government efforts and land finance: A perspective of land finance in China. China Industrial Economics (Zhongguo Gongye Jingji), 319 (10), 33–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, H., Yin, F., & Li, J. (2008). China’s construction land expansion and economic growth: A capital-output ratio based analysis. China & World Economy, 16 (6), 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lichtenberg, E., & Ding, C. (2009). Land officials as land developers: Urban spatial expansion in China. Journal of Urban Economics, 66, 57–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, J., Wu, J. N., & Ma, L. (2012). Local officials’ promotion and land finance in China: An empirical analysis of panel data from municipal-level cities. Journal of Public Management (Gonggong Guanli Xuebao), 9 (2), 11–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, X. G., Zhang, X., & Fang, W. Q. (2015). The income allocation of infrastructure between rural area and urban area: A perspective from labor transfer. The Journal of World Economy (Shijie Jingji), 3, 145–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loupias, C., & Wigniolle, B. (2013). Population, land and growth. Economic Modeling, 31, 223–237.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCain, R. (1970). Land in Fellner’s model of economic growth: Comment. The American Economic Review, 60 (3), 495–499.

    Google Scholar 

  • Metzemakers, P., & Louw, E. (2005). Land as a production factor. Chapter to be presented on 45th Congress of the European Regional Science Association in Amsterdam, 23–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ngai, R. (2004). Barriers and the transition to modern growth. Journal of Monetary Economics, 51 (7), 1353–1383.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nichols, D. (1970). Land and economic growth. The American Economic Review, 60 (3), 332–340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Research Group on China’s Economic Growth (CASS). (2011). Urbanization, fiscal expansion and economic growth, Economic Research Journal (Jingji Yanjiu), 46 (11), 4–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhee, C. (1991). Dynamic inefficiency in an economy with land. Review of Economic Studies, 58 (4), 791–797.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solow, R. (1974). Intergenerational equity and exhaustible resources. The Review of Economic Studies, 41, 29–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun, X. L., & Zhou, F. Z. (2013). Land finance and the tax-sharing system: An empirical explanation. Social Sciences in China (Zhongguo Shehui Kexue), 4, 40–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, Y., Zhang, X., Skitmore, M., Song, Y., & Hui, E. (2014). Industrial land price and its impact on urban growth: A Chinese case study. Land Use Policy, 36, 199–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xue, B., & Chi, X. (2010). Land finance, rent-seeking and economic growth. Public Finance Research (Caizheng Yanjiu), 2, 27–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ye, J. P., Ma, C. F., & Zhang, Q. H. (2011). The analysis on the contribution of land to economic growth in China: Based on spatial panel data. Finance & Trade Economies (Caimao Jingji), 4, 15–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu, J. W., Xiao, J., & Gong, L. T. (2015). Political cycle and land leasing: Evidence from Chinese cities. Economic Research Journal (Jingji Yanjiu), 50 (2), 88–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zou, W., & Liu, H. Y. (2015). Land finance in China: an empirical analysis of spatial panel data from municipal-level cities. Economist (Jingji Xuejia), 9, 21–32.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Yue, S., Lu, Y. (2019). How Does Land Finance Affect Economic Growth in China?. In: He, D., Wang, C. (eds) A New Era. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-8357-0_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics