Skip to main content

Roles of Chinese Regions in Global Value Chains and Their Changes

An Analysis Based on a Global Input-Output Model in Which Chinese Regions Are Embedded

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
A New Era

Abstract

Not only has the division of labor system in global value chains developed extensively between countries, but it also has spread into individual countries in the form of domestic value chains. This is particularly significant in the case of China that is vast in territory and rich in natural resources with great regional differences. This chapter creates a global input-output table that covers subregions, and on this basis, develops the breakdown method for value-added exports and total export value added, and offers an empirical analysis of the roles that different regions of China played in global value chains as well as changes in 1997, 2002 and 2007. Research findings show that: (1) Trade in value added varied widely from region to region in China. In traditional statistics on trade in gross value, trade surpluses of regions were overestimated, and there even were phenomena that some regions had a trade surplus in gross-value terms but a trade deficit in value-added terms. (2) The Chinese inland regions achieved the value-added export directly by offering intermediate products to the coastal regions. Traditional statistics on trade in gross value generally overrated the coastal regions and underrated the inland regions in terms of their contributions to foreign trade. (3) Following China’s accession to the WTO, regions all over the country had a fast-increasing degree of vertical specialization, with the coastal regions outperforming the inland ones in this respect. But there were different structural factors responsible for rising vertical specialization. For the inland regions, it was largely because of increased connection with other regions in terms of vertical specialization, and in the case of the coastal regions, it was with other countries in the world.

CLC Number: F74; Document Code: A; Article No.: 1002-8102 (2016) 10-0087-15

Funded study projects: “A Study of Paths and Strategies for Broadening the Opening-up of China’s Services Sector” (14ZDA084), The National Social Science Fund of China; “A Study of the Impact of Population Aging on Regional Economy: Based on a OLG-CGE Model” (71401009), National Natural Science Foundation of China; “Transfer of Industries between the Regions of China during Economic Transformation: Observations, Mechanisms and Policies” (71473054), National Natural Science Foundation of China.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    For the convenience of expounding, this chapter refers to the value chains between regions within a country as “domestic value chains” and those between countries as “international value chains”. GVCs in this chapter is relatively broad concept, that is, including “domestic value chains” and “international value chains”.

  2. 2.

    In different studies this is variably known as vertical specialization , production fragmentation, outsourcing, global supply chains and global value chains.

  3. 3.

    Restricted by length requirements, the chapter did not give a detailed description of the tabulation method, which the authors may make available upon request.

  4. 4.

    The WIOD project, which lasted three years (from May 2009 to April 2012) and involved 11 research organizations with 4 million euros in funding, covered 27 EU countries and 13 non-EU countries, involving 35 industrial sectors and 59 product sectors over the span 1995–2011. WIOD data is available at: http://www.wiod.org/database/index.htm.

  5. 5.

    See Dietzenbacher et al. (2013). In the WIOTs, mainland China, Hong Kong and Macao together were treated as a whole.

  6. 6.

    Meng et al. (2013) further developed the breakdown formula used by KWW (2014) regarding subregions and broke down value-added exports and DVA within a country (region) based on domestic value chains and international value chains (relations between countries in global value chains). Considering that from a country’s (region’s) point of view, the TiVA method is the same as the value-added exports calculation method in the KWW (2014) formula, Meng et al. (2013)’s breakdown method based on domestic and international value chains is consistent with this chapter’s breakdown method that starts directly with the TiVA formula.

  7. 7.

    The inversion of a diagonal block matrix is also a diagonal block matrix

  8. 8.

    The difference between BEE − BdEE, BEr − BdErand so on may be considered to be international feedback effects arising from domestic and international value chains. This chapter attributes the value-added exports and outflows thus caused to international value chain channels.

  9. 9.

    So treated to keep consistent as much as possible with the VS definition of Hummels et al. (2001). WWZ (2013) defines VS as FVA plus repeated calculation items (items 13 and 16) in PDC in connection with foreign countries, that is, the sum of the 11th through 16th item in the 16-item breakdown formula.

  10. 10.

    See WWZ (2013) for details about the 16-item breakdown formula.

  11. 11.

    Trade data used in this chapter was generated through MATLAB programming based on TiVA calculation formulae. Detailed program codes and data are available on request.

  12. 12.

    VAXR may be greater than 1. Circumstances where the value is greater than 1 are consistent with theoretical predictions, which however is a flaw of the indicator. WWZ (2013) noted that VAXR for a particular industry might not certainly be smaller than 1 and that a greater value than 1 for the industry was because the industry’s value added was a result not only of direct exports through the industry but of indirect exports through other industries. This chapter also found on a subregional level that VAXR for a particular region within a country might also be greater than 1, because the region’s value added came from not only direct exports through the region itself but also indirect exports by supplying intermediate products to other regions.

  13. 13.

    Restricted by the length of this chapter, there are only listed the breakdown results of value-added exports and outflows of the regions without including results of their value-added exports to foreign countries. In addition, only data for the year 2007 is included. Data for 1997 and 2002 is available on request.

  14. 14.

    This part of domestic value added was first exported to foreign countries but was also contained in imports from other countries and finally consumed domestically, known as RDV. RDV, though not part of value added exports of a country, is part of the country’s GDP hidden in exports.

References

  • Ping, Xinqiao et al. China Center for Economic Research. Vertical Specialization in Export Trade of China and China-US Trade. The Journal of World Economy, Issue 5, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Su, Qingyi. A Breakdown of Provincial-level Export Value Added in China and Its Application. Economic Research Journal, Issue 1, 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Jie, Chen, Zhiyuan and Liu, Yuanchun. Estimation and Change Mechanism of Domestic Value-added in China’s Exports, Economic Research Journal, Issue 10, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, J. L. et al. Non-competing Input-Occupancy-Output Model and Its Application: China-US Trade Surplus in Perspective. Social Sciences in China, Issue 5, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costinot, A., Jonathan V., & Wang, S., An Elementary Theory of Global Supply Chains. Review of Economic Studies, Vol. 80, No. 1, 2013, pp. 109—144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dedrick, J., Kraemer, K.L., & Linden, G., Who Profits from Innovation in Global Value Chains?: A Study of the IPod and Notebook PCs. Industrial and Corporate Change, Vol. 19, No. 1, 2010, pp. 81–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dietzenbacher, E., Joaquim M. G., & Denise I., The Role of Brazilian Regions in the Global Value Chain, Working Paper, 2014,

    Google Scholar 

  • Dietzenbacher, E., Robert Stehrer, Marcel Timmer and Gaaitzen De Vries. The Construction of World Input-Output Tables In the WIOD Project. Economics Systems Research, 2013, Vol. 25, No. 1, pp. 71–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Findlay, R., An ‘Austrian’ Model of International Trade and Interest Rate Equalization. Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 86, No. 6, 1978,pp. 989–1007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, G.M., & Rossi-Hansberg, E., Trading Tasks: A Simple Theory of Offshoring. The American Economic Review, Vol. 98, No. 5, 2008, pp. 1978–1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hummels, D., Ishii, J., & Yi, Kei-Mu., The Nature and Growth of Vertical Specialization in World Trade. Journal of International Economics, Vol. 54, No. 1, 2001, pp. 75–96.

  • Johnson, R.C., & Noguera, G., Accounting for Intermediates: Production Sharing and Trade in Value-added. Journal of International Economics, Vol. 86, No. 2, 2012, pp. 224–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kee H. L., & Tang, H., Domestic Value-added in Exports: Theory and Firm Evidence from China. American Economic Review, Vol. 106, No. 6, 2015, pp. 1402–1436.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koopman R., Wang Z., & Wei, S.J., Tracing Value-added and Double Counting in Gross Exports. American Economic Review, Vol. 104, No. 2, 2014, pp. 459—494.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linden, G., Kraemer, K.L., & Dedrick, J., Who Captures Value in a Global Innovation System? The Case of Apple’s iPod. Communications of the ACM, Vol. 52, No. 3, 2009, pp. 140–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meng, B., Wang Z., & Koopman, R., How are Global Value Chains Fragmented and Extended In China’s Domestic Production Networks? IDE Discussion Paper No. 424, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meng, B., Yamano N., & Fang, Y., China’s Regional Economics and Value Chains: An Interregional Input-output Analysis, IDE Discussion Paper, No. 359, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tempest, R., Barbie and the World Economy. Los Angeles Times, September 22, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Upward, R., Wang, Z., & Zheng, J., Weighing China’s Export Basket: The Domestic Content and Technology Intensity of Chinese Exports. Journal of Comparative Economics, Vol. 41, No. 2, 2013, pp. 527–543.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang Z., Wei, S.J., & Zhu K.F., Quantifying International Production Sharing at the Bilateral and Sector Levels. Working Paper 19677. November, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xing, Y., & Detert N., How the iPhone Widens the United States Trade Deficit with the People’s Republic of China. ADBI Working Paper, 257, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Ni, H., Xia, J. (2019). Roles of Chinese Regions in Global Value Chains and Their Changes. In: He, D., Wang, C. (eds) A New Era. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-8357-0_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics