Skip to main content

Conceptualizing Strategic Partnerships

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
India and Japan

Part of the book series: Politics of South Asia ((POSAS))

Abstract

The India–Japan “special strategic and global partnership” has been described as one that will define the Indo-Pacific and shape the Asian century. This introductory chapter introduces the reader to a brief history of the growing relationship, defines the hitherto inadequately explored concept of “strategic partnership” in a post-alliance world, explains the objectives, design and relevance of the book and outlines the distinguishing features of the chapters to follow.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    See, e.g., C. Raja Mohan, “The Case for Alliance,” Indian Express, September 14, 2017, http://indianexpress.com/article/opinion/columns/the-case-for-alliance/. From China ’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs came a more critical comment following the same line of thinking. See Sutirtho Patranobis, “China Has a Message for India and Japan : Form Partnership, Not Alliance,” Hindustan Times, September 14, 2017, http://www.hindustantimes.com/world-news/china-has-a-message-for-india-and-japan-form-partnership-not-alliance/story-HEygMJnZgSZOHxdvhrWaHI.html.

  2. 2.

    Joint Statement on India and Japan Vision 2025: Special Strategic and Global Partnership Working Together for Peace and Prosperity of the Indo-Pacific Region and the World, Ministry of External Affairs India , December 12, 2015, http://www.mea.gov.in/bilateral-documents.htm?dtl/26176 (accessed April 25, 2016).

  3. 3.

    Media Statement by Prime Minister with Japanese Prime Minister in New Delhi, Ministry of External Affairs India , December 12, 2015, http://pib.nic.in/newsite/PrintRelease.aspx?relid=133117 (accessed April 25, 2016).

  4. 4.

    Kiyoshi Takenaka, “Japan and India Vow to Boost Defence Ties during Summit,” Reuters, September 1, 2014, http://in.reuters.com/article/japan-india-investment-modi-idINKBN0GW15520140901 (accessed April 26, 2016).

  5. 5.

    David Brewster, “The India–Japan Security Relationship: An Enduring Security Partnership?” Asian Security, 6, 2 (2010), pp. 95–120.

  6. 6.

    C. Raja Mohan, Crossing the Rubicon: The Shaping of India ’s New Foreign (New Delhi: Viking/Penguin, 2003), p. 263.

  7. 7.

    Christopher W. Hughes, Japan ’s Re-Emergence as a ‘Normal’ Military Power, Adelphi Paper (London: IISS and Routledge, 2005), pp. 68–369.

  8. 8.

    Richard Fontaine, “Where Is America in Japan and India ’s Plans for Asia?” The National Interest, December 28, 2015, http://nationalinterest.org/feature/where-america-japan-indias-plans-asia-14741 (accessed May 1, 2016).

  9. 9.

    See, e.g., Mark Beeson, “Hegemonic Transition in East Asia? The Dynamics of Chinese and American Power,” Review of International Studies, 35, 1 (January 2009), pp. 95–112; Aaron L. Friedberg, A Contest for Supremacy. China , America, and the Struggle for Mastery in Asia (New York: W. W. Norton, 2011); Kishore Mahbubani, The New Asian Hemisphere: The Irresistible Shift of Global Power to the East (New York: Public Affairs, 2008).

  10. 10.

    On hegemony and challenge, see Robert S. Gilpin, War and Change in World Politics (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1981).

  11. 11.

    The apparent “imbalance” between their nuclear arsenals matters little. For a more detailed discussion on the irrelevance of nuclear balances, see Rajesh Basrur, “Nuclear Deterrence: The Wohlstetter-Blackett Debate Revisited,” Working Paper No. 271, S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies, Nanyang Technological University, April 15, 2014, https://www.rsis.edu.sg/wp-content/uploads/rsis-pubs/WP271.pdf. On US–China economic interdependence , see Stephen S. Roach, “China ’s Big Sticks,” Project Syndicate, January 25, 2017, https://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/trump-china-protectionism-retaliation-by-stephen-s--roach-2017-01.

  12. 12.

    See, e.g., Rajesh M. Basrur, “Modi’s Foreign Policy Fundamentals: A Trajectory Unchanged,” International Affairs, 93, 1 (January 2017), pp. 7–26; Feng Zhongping and Huang Jing, “China’s Strategic Partnership Diplomacy: Engaging with a Changing World,” Working Paper No. 8, European Strategic Partnerships Observatory, Brussels, June 2014, http://strategicpartnerships.eu/publications/chinas-strategic-partnership-diplomacy-engaging-with-a-changing-world/ (accessed February 10, 2015); Natalie M. Hess, “EU Relations with ‘Emerging’ Strategic Partners: Brazil, India and South Africa,” Focus, 2, 2012, http://www.giga-hamburg.de/en/publication/eu-relations-with-emerging-strategic-partners-brazil-india-and-south-africa (accessed February 10, 2015); Vidya Nadkarni, Strategic Partnerships in Asia: Balancing Without Alliances (Abingdon and New York: Routledge, 2010); Prashant Parameswaran, “Explaining US Strategic Partnerships in the Asia-Pacific Region: Origins, Development and Prospects,” Contemporary Southeast Asia , 36, 2 (2014), pp. 262–289; Thomas S. Wilkins, “‘Alignment,’ Not ‘Alliance’—The Shifting Paradigm of International Security Cooperation: Toward a Conceptual Taxonomy of Alignment,” Review of International Studies, 38, 1 (2012), pp. 53–76. On the India–Japan relationship, see Yogesh Joshi and Harsh V. Pant, “Indo-Japanese Strategic Partnership and Power Transition in Asia,” India Review, 14, 3 (July–September 2015), pp. 312–329.

  13. 13.

    Takenori Horimoto and Lalima Varma, eds., IndiaJapan Relations in Emerging Asia (New Delhi, 2013); Arpita Mathur, IndiaJapan Relations: Drivers, Trends and Prospects, RSIS Monograph No. 23, 2012; Rohan Mukherjee and Anthony Yazaki, eds., Poised for Partnership. Deepening IndiaJapan Relations in the Asian Century (New Delhi: Oxford University Press, 2016); Shutaro Sano, “Japan–India Development and Security Cooperation Should Be Steady, Not Rushed,” Asia Pacific Bulletin, 382, May 31, 2017; N. S. Sisodia and G. V. C. Naidu, eds., IndiaJapan Relations: Partnership for Peace and Security in Asia (New Delhi: Promilla & Co and Bibliophile South Asia , 2006).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Basrur, R., Kutty, S.N. (2018). Conceptualizing Strategic Partnerships. In: Basrur, R., Kutty, S. (eds) India and Japan. Politics of South Asia. Palgrave Pivot, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-8309-9_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics