Abstract
This chapter deals with the question of what is perceived as legitimate knowledge for constructing, discussing or questioning teachers’ work. After noting the importance of knowledge in the emergence and recognition of a professional group, we argue that the professional group of teachers has traditionally occupied a position of relative exteriority with respect to the definition of knowledge useful for the profession. Our hypothesis is that the development of New Public Management in the educational field, combined with the promotion of evidence-based education, contributes to a definition that is even more external to the group of knowledge and techniques considered legitimate for the professional activity of teaching. By contrast, the criticisms of evidence-based education seem to encourage the development of an alternative conception of teacher knowledge that is more rooted in the professional group and peer interactions, based on a professional judgment structured by the singular features of the situations encountered.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
In the French-speaking countries in particular (France, Quebec, Switzerland), a major current of contemporary research seeks to analyse teachers’ practices and their professional activity in order to investigate their knowledge and learning methods (Ria 2015).
References
Apple, M. (1980). Curricular form and the logic of technical control: Building the possessive individual. In L. Barton, R. Meighan, & S. Walker (Eds.), Schooling, ideology and curriculum (pp. 11–28). Lewes: Falmer Press.
Apple, M. (1983). Work, class and teaching. In L. Barton & S. Walker (Eds.), Gender, class and education (pp. 53–68). Lewes: Falmer Press.
Biesta, G. (2007). Why “what works” won’t work: Evidence-based practice and the democratic deficit in educational research. Educational Theory, 57(1), 1–22.
Biesta, G. (2010). Why ‘what works’ still won’t work. From evidence-based education to value-based education. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 29(5), 491–503.
Bourdoncle, R. (1993). La professionnalisation des enseignants: les limites d’un mythe. Revue Française de Pédagogie, 105, 83–119.
Bourdoncle, R. (1994). Savoir professionnel et formation des enseignants. Une typologie sociologique. Spirale. Revue de Recherche en Education, 13, 77–96.
Bourgeois, E. (2013). Expérience et apprentissage. La contribution de John Dewey. In L. Albarello, J. M. Barbier, E. Bourgeois, & M. Durand (Eds.), Expérience, activité, apprentissage (pp. 13–38). Paris: PUF.
Bowles, S., & Gintis, H. (1976). Schooling in capitalist America. Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Brown, S., & McIntyre, D. (1993). Making sense of teaching. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Champy, F. (2009). La sociologie des professions. Paris: PUF.
Chapoulie, J.-M. (1973). Sur l’analyse sociologique des groupes professionnels. Revue Française de Sociologie, 14(1), 86–114.
Connelly, F. M., & Clandinin, D. J. (1988). Teachers as curriculum planners. Narratives of experience. New York: Teachers College Press.
Davies, P. (1999). What is evidence-based education? British Journal of Educational Studies, 47(2), 108–121.
Demazière, D., Lessard, C., & Morissette, J. (2013). Les effets de la Nouvelle Gestion Publique sur le travail des professionnels: transpositions, variations, ambivalences. Education et Sociétés, 2(32), 5–20.
Dupriez, V. (2015). Peut-on réformer l’école ? Approches organisationnelle et institutionnelle du changement pédagogique. Louvain-la-Neuve: De Boeck Supérieur.
Dupriez, V., & Malet, R. (Eds.). (2013). L’évaluation dans les systèmes scolaires. Accommodements du travail et reconfiguration des professionnalités. Bruxelles: De Boeck.
Evans, L. (2008). Professionalism, professionality and the development of education professionals. British Journal of Educational Studies, 56(1), 20–38.
Hargreaves, D. H. (1996). Teaching as a research-based profession: Possibilities and prospects. Cambridge: Teacher Training Agency Annual Lecture.
Hiebert, J., Gallimore, R., & Stigler, J. W. (2002). A knowledge base for the teaching profession: What would it look like and how can we get one? Educational Researcher, 31(5), 3–15.
Hofstetter, R. & Schneuwly, B. (2009). Introduction. In R. Hofstetter, & B. Schneuwly (Eds.), Savoirs en (trans)formation. Au cœur des professions de l’enseignement et de la formation (pp. 7–40). Bruxelles: De Boeck.
Kennedy, M. M. (1983). Working knowledge. Science Communication, 5(2), 193–211.
Little, J. W. (2006). Professional development and professional community in the learner-centered school. Washington, DC: National Education Association.
Lortie, D. (1975). Schoolteacher: A sociological analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago.
Malet, R. (2016). Les politiques de professionnalisation de l’enseignement: conditions de développement, de diffusion et variations dans les usages et les effets. Education Comparée, 16, 117–202.
Maroy, C., & Cattonar, B. (2002). Professionnalisation ou déprofessionnalisation des enseignants. Le cas de la Communauté française de Belgique. Les Cahiers de Recherche du GIRSEF, 18.
Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340–363.
Paquay, L. (2012). Avancées et continuités dans la recherche sur la formation des enseignants. Les Cahiers de recherche du GIRSEF, 90, 1–35.
Perrenoud, P. (1996). Le métier d’enseignant entre prolétarisation et professionnalisation: deux modèles de changement. Perspectives, XXVI, 3, 543–562.
Portes, P. R. (2005). Dismantling educational inequality: A cultural-historical approach to closing the achievement gap. New York: Peter Lang.
Ria, L. (Ed.). (2015). Former les enseignants au XXIe siècle. Etablissement formateur et vidéoformation. Bruxelles: De Boeck.
Reynolds, M. C. (Ed.). (1989). The knowledge base for the beginning teacher. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
Saussez, F., & Lessard, C. (2009). Entre orthodoxie et pluralisme, les enjeux de l’éducation basée sur la preuve. Revue Française de Pédagogie, 168, 111–136.
Scheerens, J., & Bosker, R. J. (1997). The foundations of educational effectiveness. Oxford: Pergamon.
Slavin, R. E. (2002). Evidence-based education policies: Transforming educational practice and research. Educational Researcher, 31(7), 15–21.
Tardif, M., & Lessard, C. (1999). Le travail enseignant au quotidien: contribution à l’étude du travail dans les métiers et les professions d’interactions humaines. Québec: Presses de l’Université Laval.
Tardif, M., Lessard, C., & Lahaye, L. (1991). Les enseignants des ordres d’enseignement primaire et secondaire face aux savoirs. Esquisse d’une problématique du savoir enseignant. Sociologie et Sociétés, XXIII, 1, 55–69.
Vangrieken, K., Dochy, F., Raes, E., & Kyndt, E. (2015). Teacher collaboration: A systematic review. Educational Research Review, 15, 17–40.
Vause, A. (2010). Le processus de construction de la connaissance ouvragée des enseignants. Les Cahiers de Recherche en Éducation et Formation, 82.
Verloop, N., Van Driel, J., & Meijer, P. (2001). Teacher knowledge and the knowledge base of teaching. International Journal of Educational Research, 35(5), 441–461.
Vescio, V., Ross, D., & Adams, A. (2008). A review of research on the impact of professional learning communities on teaching practice and student learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(1), 80–91.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. and Educational Science Publishing House
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Dupriez, V., Cattonar, B. (2018). Between Evidence-Based Education and Professional Judgment, What Future for Teachers and Their Knowledge?. In: Normand, R., Liu, M., Carvalho, L., Oliveira, D., LeVasseur, L. (eds) Education Policies and the Restructuring of the Educational Profession. Perspectives on Rethinking and Reforming Education. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-8279-5_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-8279-5_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-8278-8
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-8279-5
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)