Abstract
The notion of school leadership is far from being stabilized and, beyond its global dissemination, its realization varies according to policies and local contexts. There is a large agreement for assuming that this English-speaking paradigm, carried by International Organizations, faces different cultural and institutional traditions in Europe as well as in Latin America, and that leading school organizations cannot be reduced to neo-managerial perspectives. However, leadership remains a heuristic concept to reflect on the emergence of new roles and responsibilities between principals and teachers at school level.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Alexiadou, N., & Lundahl, L. (2016). Reforming Swedish education by introduction of quasimarkets and competition. In H. Gunter, E. Grimaldi, D. Hall, & R. Serpieri (Eds.), New public management and the reform of education: European lessons for policy and practice (pp. 66–80). London & New York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis.
Ärlestig, H., Johansson, O., & Nihlfors, E. (2016). Sweden: Swedish school leadership research—An important but neglected area. In H. Arlestig, D. Christopher, & J. Olof (Eds.), A decade of research on school principals (pp. 103–122). Springer: Dordrecht.
Barrère, A. (2013). Sociologie des chefs d’établissement. Les managers de la République. 2e éd. Paris: PUF.
Beatty, B. (2007). Feeling the future of school leadership: Learning to lead with the emotions in mind. Leading and Managing, 13(2), 44.
Biesta, G. (2007). Why “what works” won’t work: Evidence-based practice and the democratic deficit in educational research. Educational Theory, 57(1), 1–22.
Biesta, G. (2015). What is education for? On good education, teacher judgement, and educational professionalism. European Journal of Education, 50(1), 75–87.
Bogotch, I. E. (2000). Educational leadership and social justice: Practice into theory. Journal of School Leadership, 12(2), 138–156.
Boltanski, L., & Thévenot, L. (2006). On justification: Economies of worth. Princeton University Press.
Cambron-McCabe, N., & McCarthy, M. M. (2005). Educating school leaders for social justice. Educational Policy, 19(1), 201–222.
Dutercq, Y., Gather Thurler, M., & Pelletier, G. (2015). Le leadership éducatif. Bruxelles: De Boeck.
Evetts, J. (2009). New professionalism and new public management: Changes, continuities and consequences. Comparative Sociology, 8(2), 247–266.
Frost, D. (2006). The concept of ‘agency’ in leadership for learning. Leading and Managing, 12(2), 19–28.
Grace, G. (1995). School leadership: Beyond education management: An essay in policy scholarship. Psychology Press.
Grimaldi, E., & Serpieri, R. (2014). Italian education beyond hierarchy: Governance, evaluation and headship. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 42(4_suppl), 119–138.
Gunter, H. M. (2008). Policy and workforce reform in England. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 36(2), 253–270.
Gunter, H. M. (2016). An intellectual history of school leadership practice and research. Bloomsbury Publishing.
Gunter, H. M., Grimaldi, E., Hall, D., & Serpieri, R. (Eds.). (2016). New public management and the reform of education: European lessons for policy and practice. Routledge.
Hall, D., Gunter, H., & Bragg, J. (2013). Leadership, new public management and the re-modelling and regulation of teacher identities. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 16(2), 173–190.
Hargreaves, A. (2003). Teaching in the knowledge society: Education in the age of insecurity. Teachers College Press.
Hargreaves, A., & Shirley, D. L. (Eds.). (2009). The fourth way: The inspiring future for educational change. Corwin Press.
MacBeath, J., & Moos, L. (Eds.). (2004). Democratic learning: The challenge to school effectiveness. Psychology Press.
McClelland, D. C. (1985). How motives, skills, and values determine what people do. American Psychologist, 40(7), 812.
Meyer, H.-D., & Benavot, A. (Eds.). (2013). PISA, power, and policy: The emergence of global educational governance. Symposium Books Ltd.
Møller, J., & Vedøy, G. (2013). Leadership for social justice—Educating students as active citizens in a democratic society. Leading Schools Successfully: Stories from the Field, 163.
Møller, J., & Skedsmo, G. (2013). Modernising education: New public management reform in the Norwegian education system. Journal of Educational Administration and History, 45(4), 336–353.
Moos, L. (2008). School leadership for ‘Democratic Bildung’: Fundamentalist beliefs or critical reflection? School Leadership and Management, 28(3), 229–246.
Moos, L. (2014). Educational governance in Denmark. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 13(4), 424–443.
Moos, L. (2015). Leadership for creativity. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 18(2), 178–196.
Normand, R. (2008). School effectiveness or the horizon of the world as a laboratory. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 29(6), 665–676.
Normand, R. (2015). French principals in secondary education: Towards new roles and responsibilities? Journal of Educational, Cultural and Psychological Studies, 11, 135–152.
Normand, R. (2016). France: Between civil service and republican ethics—The statist vision of leadership among French principals. In A decade of research on school principals (pp. 357–374). Springer International Publishing.
Pollitt, C., & Bouckaert, G. (2004). Public management reform: A comparative analysis (2e éd.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Senge, P. M. (2006). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. Broadway Business.
Serpieri, R., & Grimaldi, E. (2015). Leader as policy device: The hybridization of head teachers in Italy. Journal of Educational, Cultural and Psychological Studies, 11, 71–87.
Spillane, J. P. (2006). Distributed leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Thrupp, M. (2005). School improvement: An unofficial approach. London: Continuum.
Thrupp, M., & Willmott, R. (2003). Education management in managerialist times: Beyond the textual apologists. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Uljens, M., Wolff, L.-A., & Frontini, S. (2013). Finland—NPM resistance or towards European neo-welfarism in education? In H. M. Gunter, E. Grimaldi, D. Hall, & R. Serpieri (Eds.), New public management and the reform of education: European lessons for policy and practice. London: Routledge (in press).
Verger, A., & Normand, R. (2015). New public management and education: Theoretical and conceptual elements for the study of a global education reform model. Educação & Sociedade, 36(132), 599–622.
Whitty, G. (2006). Education(al) research and education policy making: Is conflict inevitable? British Educational Research Journal, 32(2), 159–176.
Webb, P. T. (2006). The choreography of accountability. Journal of Education Policy, 21(2), 201–214.
Wiborg, S. (2013). Neo-liberalism and universal state education: The cases of Denmark, Norway and Sweden 1980–2011. Comparative Education, 49(4), 407–423.
Woods, P. (2005). Democratic leadership in education. London: Sage.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. and Educational Science Publishing House
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Normand, R. (2018). Leadership and New Public Management: The Forgotten Professional Dimension of School Organizations. In: Normand, R., Liu, M., Carvalho, L., Oliveira, D., LeVasseur, L. (eds) Education Policies and the Restructuring of the Educational Profession. Perspectives on Rethinking and Reforming Education. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-8279-5_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-8279-5_15
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-8278-8
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-8279-5
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)