Abstract
This research has combined qualitative and quantitative methods to investigate rural–urban income disparities. Both qualitative and quantitative methods have shown that counties like Qinggang in Heilongjiang are at a very low level of development. The interview data indicate that farming was almost the only source of peasants’ income and maize as their major product. The peasants were largely confined to the land, with few income-generating opportunities, apart from agriculture. The quantitative results confirm that transferring the surplus labour out of agriculture will help to increase rural income, thus reducing the rural–urban income gap.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Yan, Y. (2003). Private life under socialism: Love, intimacy, and family change in a Chinese village, 1949–1999. Stanford University Press.
Yan, Y. (2010). The Chinese path to individualization. The British Journal of Sociology, 61(3), 489–512.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Shanghai Jiao Tong University Press and Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Gao, Y., Fennell, S. (2018). Institutions, Urban Bias and Local Relations. In: China’s Rural–Urban Inequality in the Countryside. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-8273-3_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-8273-3_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-8272-6
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-8273-3
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)