Advertisement

Derived Genetic Key Matching for Fast and Parallel Remote Patient Data Accessing from Multiple Data Grid Locations

  • K. AshokkumarEmail author
  • P. Saravanan
  • Rusydi Umar
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems book series (LNNS, volume 33)

Abstract

In recent years, grid computing has made a fast growth in many scientific experiments and research centers in the area of medicine, scientific computation. Many research works in data grid using replication algorithm and scheduling strategies for managing large data were introduced. However, replication and scheduling strategies pose significant threat when applied in biomedical area due to parallel access limitation in grid. In this paper, Derived Genetic Key Matching (DGKM) technique is introduced for quick parallel accessing of data (heart disease patient data) available in multiple grid locations. The storage key of patient data in multiple grid locations is synchronized to improve data integrity for effective disease diagnosis. DGKM in distributed grid services allows parallel and integrated data accessing with minimal key matching time. Further, Vantage Point (VP) tree indexed Berkeley key model is designed to optimize (patients) data storage at different grid locations. The proposed technique is implemented by GridSim and is tested using Cleveland Clinic Foundation Heart disease dataset. The results showed better performance in improving data access speed by 17.04% and accuracy of integral patient data from corresponding grid location by 15.13% compared to state-of-the-art works.

Keywords

Grid computing Derived genetic Key matching Parallel accessing Gene populations Parallel computing 

References

  1. 1.
    Saadat N, Rahmani Am (2012) PDDRA: a new pre-fetching based dynamic data replication algorithm in data grids. Elsevier 28(4)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mansouri N, Dastghaibyfard GH (2013) Enhanced dynamic hierarchical replication and weighted scheduling strategy in data grid. Elsevier 73(4):534–543Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Guan H, Li J, Zhong L, Yu Y, Chapman M (2013) Process virtualization of large-scale lidar data in a cloud computing environment. Elsevier 60:109–116Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Buyya Rajkumar (2013) Introduction to the IEEE transactions on cloud computing. IEEE Trans Cloud Comput 1(1):3–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Misra S, Das S, Khatua M, Obaidat MS (2014) Qos-guaranteed bandwidth shifting and redistribution in mobile cloud environment. IEEE Trans Cloud Comput 2(2):181–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cao J, Hwang K, Li K, Zomaya AY (2013) Optimal multi server configuration for profit maximization in cloud computing. IEEE Trans Parallel Distrib Syst (TPDS) 24(6):1087–1096Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Di S, Wang C-L, Cappello F (2014) Adaptive algorithm for minimizing cloud task length with prediction errors. IEEE Trans Cloud Comput 2(2):194–207Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Duan R, Prodan R, Li X (2014) Multi-objective game theoretic scheduling of bag-of-tasks workflows on hybrid clouds. IEEE Trans Cloud Comput 2(1):29–42Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Zhang Q, Zhani MF, Boutaba R, Hellerstein JL (2014) Dynamic heterogeneity-aware resource provisioning in the cloud. IEEE Trans Cloud Comput 2(1):14–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Chen C-A, Won My, Stoleru R, Xie GG (2015) Energy efficient fault-tolerant data storage and processing in mobile cloud. IEEE Trans Cloud Comput 3(1):28–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Li K, Mu Y, Li K, Min G (2013) Exchanged crossed cube: a novel interconnection network for parallel computation. IEEE Trans Parallel Distrib Syst (TPDS) 24(11):2211–2219Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Dastjerdi AV, Buyya R (2014) Compatibility-aware cloud service composition under fuzzy preferences of users. IEEE Trans Cloud Comput 2(1):1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wan Z, Liu J, Deng RH (2012) HASBE: a hierarchical attribute-based solution for flexible and scalable access control in cloud computing. IEEE Trans Inform Forensics Sec 7(2):743–754Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sundareswaran S, Squicciarini AC, Lin D (2012) Ensuring distributed accountability for data sharing in the cloud. IEEE Trans Depend Sec Comput 9(4):556–568Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gupta R, Ramamritham K (2012) Query planning for continuous aggregation queries over a network of data aggregators. IEEE Trans Knowledge Data Eng (TKDE) 24(6):1065–1079CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Inan A, Kantarcioglu M, Ghinita G, Bertino E (2012) A hybrid approach to private record matching. IEEE Trans Depend Sec Comput 9(5):684–698Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Pitoura T, Ntarmos N, Triantafillou P (2012) Saturn: range queries, load balancing and fault tolerance in DHT data systems. IEEE Trans Knowled Data Eng (TKDE) 24(7):1313–1327Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Balasubramanian B, Garg VK (2013) Fault tolerance in distributed systems using fused data structures. IEEE Trans Parallel Distribu Syst (TPDS) 24(4):1–16Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Tao T, Cheng S (2014) Fast nearest neighbor search with keywords. IEEE Trans Knowledge Data Eng (TKDE) 26(4):1–13MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Shahbazi A, Miller J (2014) Extended subtree: a new similarity function for tree structured data. IEEE Trans Knowledge Data Eng (TKDE) 26(4):1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Wang J-L, Sun Q-W, Dong B-M, Wei F, Chen J-L, Dong Y-K, Wang A-H, Shen Z-Q (2015) Antigenic characterization of the glycosylated E2 proteins of classical swine fever virus. J Pure Appl Microbiol 9(2)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Xie S, Dan J, Yu B, Xu Y, Zou Z (2015) Comparison between staged ORIF and EFLIF in treatment of pilon fracture: a systematic review. J Pure Appl Microbiol 9(2)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Reddy PK, Reddy MS (2009) Biochemical and PCR-RAPD characterization of pseudomonas fluorescens produced antifungal compounds inhibit the rice fungal pathogens in vitro. J Pure Appl MicrobiolGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ashok kumar K, Chandrasekar (2015) Influence of vantage point-based dervied genetic key matching for heart disease diagnosis from multiple grid location. J Pure Appl Microbiol. 9(Spl. Edn. 2):637–646Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of ComputingSathyabama UniversityChennaiIndia
  2. 2.Department of Informatics Engineering, Faculty of Industrial TechnologyAhmad Dahlan UniversityYogyakartaIndonesia

Personalised recommendations