Advertisement

DDTRCSTCT: Design of Doppler Tolerant Radar Code to Increase SNR Using Trellis Code Technique

  • Rajkumar D. BhureEmail author
  • K. Manjunath Chari
  • Syed Jalal Ahmad
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems book series (LNNS, volume 33)

Abstract

In todays world the defense security system facing most important interesting issue for the doppler radar is the detection of multiple moving targets attacks. But the process of detection and ranging target fails because the shadow of fast-moving targets (noise) may hide the slow-moving targets, which may lead a serious damage in the battlefield environment. Hence, measurement of these parameters (i.e., range and resolution) of target is a challenging issue. Considering these challenges, current research trend concentrates on enhancement of Merit Factor (MF) as well as Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR) of the radar system. In this paper, a novel approach has been proposed, namely, trellis code generation using quad code sequence. This method improves the Merit Factor (MF) of the main lobe; on the other hand, it reduces the side spikes of the noise amplitude below 80 dB caused by fast-moving attacks during target detection process. Thus enhanced SNR acheived by creating multiple clear windows at different Doppler’s (frequency shift) with respect to target range. We have validated our approach using Matlab.

Keywords

Quad code Trellis coding technique Doppler Matlab Side spikes SNR 

References

  1. 1.
    Faulconbridge I (2002) Radar Fundamentals. Argos Press, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Barton DK (1975) Pulse Compression. Artech House, Norwood, MAGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lewis BL, Kretschmer FF (1981) A new class of polyphase pulse compression codes and techniques. IEEE Trans Aerospace Electron Syst 17:364–371MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Pace PE, Ng CY (2010) Costas CW frequency hopping radar waveform: peak side lobe Improvement using Golay complementary sequences. Electron Lett 46(2):169–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Freedman A, Levanon N (1986) Staggered costas signals. In: IEEE transactions on aerospace and electronic systems, vol AES-22, no. 6, pp 695–702Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Levanon N, Mozeson E (2004) Orthogonal train of modified Costas pulses. In: Proceedings of the IEEE radar conference, April 2004, pp 255–259Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Yang H, Zhou J, Wang F, Zhang Z (2011) Design and analysis of Costas/PSK RF stealth Signal waveform. In: IEEE CIE international conference on radarGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lemieux J, Ingels F Analysis of FSK/PSK modulated radar signals using Costas arrays and complementary Welti codes. In: Record of the IEEE international radar conference, 990, pp 589–594Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Borwein P, Kaltofen E, Mossinghoff M (2007) Irreducible polynomials and Barker Sequences. ACM Commun Comput Algebra 41(4)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lewis BL, Kretschmer F (1981) A new class of polyphase pulse compression codes and Techniques. IEEE Trans Aerospace Electr Syst 17(3):364–372Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ravi Krishna Reddy D, Anuradha BJ (2015) Improved SNR of MST Radar Signals By Kaiser-Hamming and Cosh-Hamming Window Functions. Int J Eng Res Appl 5(3):32–38Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Singh K, Elizabath Rani D Syed Jalal Ahmad (2016) Re-sampling binary hex code windowing technique to enhance target detection. Indian J Sci Technol, 9(47).  https://doi.org/10.17485/ijst/2016/v9i47/105952

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rajkumar D. Bhure
    • 1
    Email author
  • K. Manjunath Chari
    • 2
  • Syed Jalal Ahmad
    • 3
  1. 1.GITAMHyderabadIndia
  2. 2.GITAM UniversityHyderabadIndia
  3. 3.MIETJammuIndia

Personalised recommendations