Advertisement

Breast Cancer Diagnosis from Digital Mammograms Using RF and RF-ELM

  • R. D. GhongadeEmail author
  • D. G. Wakde
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems book series (LNNS, volume 34)

Abstract

Artificial neural network is used as emerging diagnostic tool for breast cancer. The objective of this research is to diagnose breast cancer with a machine learning method based on random forest (RF) and RF-ELM classifier. MIAS database is used for digital mammogram images. Preprocessing is generally needed to improve the low quality of image. The region of interest (ROI) is determined according to the size of suspicious area. After the suspicious region is segmented, features are extracted by texture analysis. Gray-level co-occurrence matrix (GLCM) is used as a texture attribute to extract the suspicious area. From all extracted features, best features are selected with the help of correlation-based feature (CBF) selection. Selected features to improve the accuracy of classification are mean, standard deviation, kurtosis, variance, entropy, and correlation coefficient. RF and RF-ELM are used as classifiers. The results of present work show that the CAD system using RF-ELM classifier is very effective and achieves the best result in the diagnosis of breast cancer.

Keywords

Breast cancer CAD ELM Feature selection Mammogram RF-ELM 

References

  1. 1.
    Jemal, A., Bray, F., Center, M.M., Ferlay, J., Ward, E., Forman, D.: Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J. Clin. 61(2), 69–90 (2011)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Forouzanfar, M.H., Foreman, K.J., Delossantos, A.M.: Breast and cervical cancer in 187 countries between 1980 and 2010: a systematic analysis. Lancet 378(9801), 1461–84 (2011)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Rebecca, L., Siegel, M.P.H., Miller, K.D., Ahmedin Jemal, D.V.M.: Cancer statistics, 2017. CA A Cancer J. Clin. (2017)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Study Forecasts New Breast Cancer Cases by 2030. By NCI Staff, National Cancer Institute at the National Institutes of Health, USA (2015)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kolb, T.M., Lichy, J., Newhouse, J.H.: Comparison of the performance of screening mammography, physical examination, and breast US and evaluation of factors that influence them: an analysis of 27,825 patient evaluations. Radiology 225(1), 165–175 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cheng, H.D., Cai, X., Chen, X., Hu, L., Lou, X.: Computer-aided detection and classification of microcalcifications in mammograms: a survey. Pattern Recogn. 36(12), 2967–2991 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cheng, H.D., Shi, X.J., Min, R., Hu, L.M., Cai, X.P., Du, H.N.: Approaches for automated detection and classification of masses in mammograms. Pattern Recogn. 39(4), 646–668 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Motakis, E., Ivshina, A.V., Kuznetsov, V.A.: Data-driven approach to predict survival of cancer patients. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Mag. 28(4), 58–66 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Karahaliou, A.N., Boniatis, I.S., Skiadopoulos, S.G., Sakellaropoulos, F.N., Arikidis, N.S., Likaki, E.A.: Breast cancer diagnosis: analyzing texture of tissue surrounding microcalcifications. IEEE Trans. Inf. Technol. Biomed. 12(6), 731–738 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Marcano-Cedeño, J., Quintanilla-Domínguez, D.: Andina: WBCD breast cancer database classification applying artificial metaplasticity neural network. Expert Syst. Appl. 38(2011), 9573–9579 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Jiji, G.W., Marsilin, J.R.: Automatic diagnose of the stages of breast cancer using intelligent technique. J. Inst. Eng. India Ser. B 93(4), 209–215 (2013)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ahmad, F., Isa, N.A.M., Noor, M.H.M., Hussain, Z.: Intelligent breast cancer diagnosis using hybrid GA-ANN. In: 2013 Fifth International Conference (IEEE) on Computational Intelligence, Communication Systems and Networks, pp. 9–12 (2013)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Nugroho, H.A., Faisal, N., Soesanti, I. and Choridah, L.: Analysis of computer aided diagnosis on digital mammogram images. In: 2014 International Conference (IEEE) on Computer, Control, Informatics and Its Applications, pp. 25–29 (2014)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Dheeba, J., Albert Singh, N., Tamil Selvi, s: Computer-aided detection of breast cancer on mammograms: a swarm intelligence optimized wavelet neural network approach. J. Biomed. Inf. 49, 45–52 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Xie, W., Li, Y., Ma, Y.: Breast mass classification in digital mammography based on extreme learning machine. Neurocomputing (2015) (Elsevier Ltd.)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mohebian, M.R., Marateb, H.R., Mansourian, M., Mañanas, M.A., Mokarian, F.: A hybrid computer-aided-diagnosis system for prediction of breast cancer recurrence (HPBCR) using optimized ensemble learning. Comput. Struct. Biotechnol., 75–85 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.SGB Amravati UniversityAmravatiIndia
  2. 2.P. R. Patil College of Engineering & TechnologyAmravatiIndia

Personalised recommendations