Advertisement

A Simulation-Based Comparison on Code Excited Linear Prediction (CELP) Coder at Different Bit Rates

  • Swati JoshiEmail author
  • Hemant Purohit
  • Rita Choudhary
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems book series (LNNS, volume 34)

Abstract

A better speech quality is necessary for transmission of speech in mobile communication systems in Digital Telephony. Nowadays, the conversion of analog speech signals into digital format is required for effective transmission of speech over different channels at far ends. The technique for conversion of speech in digital form is very old and ordinary one which is termed as pulse code modulation (PCM), but the bandwidth of the digitally converted data is too large, so a better level of compression is needed to reduce the bandwidth and enhance the capacity of channel. The compression of speech in nowadays is performed by a procedure called speech coding. In this paper, the code excited linear predictive (CELP) coding is summarized with different bit rates. The MATLAB R2016a version is used for simulating the 9.6 and 16 kbps CELP coder, and performance analysis is done with parameters MSE and SNR.

Keywords

Speech coding LPC CELP 

References

  1. 1.
    Ogunfunmi, T., Narasimha, M.J.: Speech over VoIP networks: advanced signal processing and system implementation. In: IEEE Circuits and Systems Magazine, Second Quarter, pp. 35–55 (2012)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ogunfunmi, T., Narasimha, M.J.: Principles of speech coding. CRC Press (2010)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Neuhoff, D.L., Philip, T.I.: Design of a CELP coder and analysis of various quantization techniques. Technical Report, University of Michigan EECS 651 (2005)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ramo, A., Toukomaa, H.: On comparing speech quality of various NB and WB speech coders. 0-7803-9243-4/05/, pp. 603–606, IEEE Multimedia Technologies laboratory, Nokia Research Center, Tampere, Finland (2005)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Edler, B., Schuller, G.: Perceptual audio coding using adaptive pre and post-filters and lossless compression. In: IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), vol. 10, pp. 881–884 IEEE (2000)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Pettigrew, R., Cuperman, V.: Backward pitch prediction for low-delay speech coding. In: IEEE Global Tele-Communications Conference and Exhibition Communications Technology for the 1990s and beyond, (GLOBECOM), United State Patent, pp. 1–12, Patent Number: 4,963,034 (1989)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Pettigrew, R., Cuperman, V.: Robust low-complexity backward adaptive pitch predictor for low-delay speech coding. Proc. IEEE Commun. Speech Vis. 138(4), 19–22 (1991)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Shetty, N., Gibson, J.D.: Perceptual pre-weighting and post-inverse weighting for speech coding. Technical Report, University of California (2007)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dietz, M.: Overview of the EVS codec architecture. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing ICASSP, 978-1-4673-6997-8/15/, pp. 5698–5602 (2015)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Qualcomm Inc., IWAENC.: Enhanced voice services. http://www.iwaenc2014.org/

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Tula’s InstituteDehradunIndia
  2. 2.JIET JodhpurJodhpurIndia

Personalised recommendations