Bottom-Up Estimation and Top-Down Prediction: Solar Energy Prediction Combining Information from Multiple Sources
Accurately forecasting solar power using the data from multiple sources is an important but challenging problem. Our goal is to combine two different physics model forecasting outputs with real measurements from an automated monitoring network so as to better predict solar power in a timely manner. To this end, we consider a new approach of analyzing large-scale multilevel models for computational efficiency. This approach features a division of the large-scale data set into smaller ones with manageable sizes, based on their physical locations, and fit a local model in each area. The local model estimates are then combined sequentially from the specified multilevel models using our novel bottom-up approach for parameter estimation. The prediction, on the other hand, is implemented in a top-down matter. The proposed method is applied to the solar energy prediction problem for the US Department of Energy’s SunShot Initiative.
This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the US government. Neither the US government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, expressed or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represented that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the US government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the US government or any agency thereof.
- Chatterjee, S., Lahiri, P., & Li, H. (2008). Parametric bootstrap approximation to the distribution of EBLUP and related prediction intervals in linear mixed models. The Annals of Statistics, 36, 1221–1245. (06)Google Scholar
- Du, J., & Tracton, M. S. (2001). Implementation of a real-time shortrange ensemble forecasting system at ncep: An update. In Ninth Conference on Mesoscale Processes, Preprints, Ninth Conference on Mesoscale Processes, Fort Lauderdale, FL., American Meteorological Society.Google Scholar
- Ela, E., Milligan, M., & Kirby, B. (2011). Operating Reserves and Variable Generation. NREL/TP-5500-51978. http://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy11osti/51978.pdf.
- Lange, K. L., Little, R. J. A., & Taylor, J. M. G. (1989). Robust statistical modeling using the T distribution. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 84, 881–896.Google Scholar
- Margolis, R., Coggeshall, C., & Zuboy, J. (2012). Integration of solar into the U.S. electric power system. In SunShot vision study. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Energy.Google Scholar
- Orwig, K., Ahlstrom, M., Banunarayanan, V., Sharp, J., Wilczak, J., Freedman, J., et al. (2015). Recent trends in variable generation forecasting and its value to the power system. IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy, 99, 1–10.Google Scholar
- Pelland, S., Galanis, G., & Kallos, G. (2013). Solar and photovoltaic forecasting through post-processing of the global environmental multiscale numerical weather prediction model. Progress in Photovoltaics: Research and Applications, 21, 284–296.Google Scholar
- Skamarock, W. C., Klemp, J. B., Dudhia, J., Gill, D. O., Barker, D. M., Duda, M. G., et al. (2008). A description of the advanced research WRF version 3. NCAR TECHNICAL NOTE: NCAR/TNñ475+STR. National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, Colorado, USA.Google Scholar
- Wong, R. K. W., Storlie, C. B., & Lee, T. C. M. (2016). A frequentist approach to computer model calibration. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology). (To appear)Google Scholar