Skip to main content

Effectiveness of Selected Knowledge-Based Determinants in Macroeconomics Development of EU 28 Economies

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Finance & Economics Readings

Abstract

The stage of development of knowledge-based economy depends not only on the effectiveness of the innovation system but on the effectiveness of economic and institutional regime, education of population and information and communication technology. The aim of this paper is to determine which of the selected determinants of the knowledge-based economy provide the intended macroeconomic effects. The measurement of the effectiveness is performed by data envelopment analysis. In the case of inefficient determinants, DEA enables to detect how such a determinant should be regulated or modified to become more effective. We employed DEA models and analysed the effectiveness of inputs involved in the macroeconomic processes. We used data from Eurostat for EU 28 countries in the years 2011–2015. The results show that minority of EU countries were efficient and that these countries were at different levels of knowledge economy. The implications can be generalized for several types of knowledge-based economies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ahuja, G., & Katila, R. (2001). Technological acquisitions and the innovation performance of acquiring firms: A longitudinal study. Strategic Management Journal, 22(3), 197–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asheim, B. T., Boschma, R., & Cooke, P. (2011). Constructing regional advantage: Platform policies based on related variety and differentiated knowledge bases. Regional Studies, 45(7), 893–904.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barro, R. J. (2013). Education and economic growth. Annals of Economics and Finance, 14(2), 301–328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biemans, W., Griffin, A., & Moenaert, R. (2007). Twenty years of the Journal of Product Innovation Management: History, participants, and knowledge stock and flows. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 24(3), 193–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, D. H., & Dahlman, C. J. (2005). The knowledge economy, the KAM methodology and World Bank operations. World Bank Institute Working Paper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowan, R., & Zinovyeva, N. (2013). University effects on regional innovation. Research Policy, 42(3), 788–800.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dahlman, C., & Andersson, T. (2000). Korea and the knowledge-based economy: Making the transition. Washington, DC: World Bank and OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeCarolis, D. M., & Deeds, D. L. (1999). The impact of stocks and flows of organizational knowledge on firm performance: An empirical investigation of the biotechnology industry. Strategic Management Journal, 20(10), 953–968.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de la Paz-Marín, M., Gutiérrez, P. A., & Hervás-Martínez, C. (2015). Classification of countries’ progress toward a knowledge economy based on machine learning classification techniques. Expert Systems with Applications, 42(1), 562–572.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fraj, E., Matute, J., & Melero, I. (2015). Environmental strategies and organizational competitiveness in the hotel industry: The role of learning and innovation as determinants of environmental success. Tourism Management, 46, 30–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galia, F., & Legros, D. (2004). Complementarities between obstacles to innovation: Evidence from France. Research Policy, 33(8), 1185–1199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gelec, E., & Wagner, F. (2014). Future trends and key challenges in R&D management-results of an empirical study within industrial R&D in Germany. Proceedings of the R&D Management Conference, 3(6), 920–926.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gemmell, N., Kneller, R., & Sanz, I. (2015). Does the composition of government expenditure matter for long‐run GDP levels? Oxford bulletin of economics and statistics, working papers 10/2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guan, J. C., Yam, R. C., Mok, C. K., & Ma, N. (2006). A study of the relationship between competitiveness and technological innovation capability based on DEA models. European Journal of Operational Research, 170(3), 971–986.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guan, J., & Chen, K. (2012). Modeling the relative efficiency of national innovation systems. Research Policy, 41(1), 102–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guellec, D., & Wunsch-Vincent, S. (2009). Policy responses to the economic crisis: Investing in innovation for long-term growth. No. 159. Paris: OECD Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hajek, P., Henriques, R., & Hajkova, V. (2014). Visualising components of regional innovation systems using self-organizing maps—Evidence from European regions. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 84, 197–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hajkova, V., & Hajek, P. (2014). Efficiency of knowledge bases in urban population and economic growth—Evidence from European cities. Cities, 40, 11–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hollanders, H., & Celikel-Esser, F. (2007). Measuring innovation efficiency. INNO Metrics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hudec, O., & Prochádzková, M. (2013). The relative efficiency of knowledge innovation processes in EU countries. Studies in Regional Science, 43(1), 145–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hudson, J., & Minea, A. (2013). Innovation, intellectual property rights, and economic development: a unified empirical investigation. World Development, 46, 66–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaffe, A. B., Trajtenberg, M., & Henderson, R. (1993). Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108(3), 577–598.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, X., Hodgkinson, I. R., & Chuang, F. M. (2014). Foreign competition, domestic knowledge base and innovation activities: Evidence from Chinese high-tech industries. Research Policy, 43(2), 414–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papacharalambous, L., & McCalman, J. (2004). Teams investing their knowledge shares in the stock market of virtuality: A gain or a loss? New Technology, Work and Employment, 19(2), 145–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parcero, O. J., & Ryan, J. C. (2016). Becoming a knowledge economy: The case of Qatar, UAE, and 17 benchmark countries. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 1–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roper, S., & Hewitt-Dundas, N. (2015). Knowledge stocks, knowledge flows and innovation: Evidence from matched patents and innovation panel data. Research Policy, 44(7), 1327–1340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seidler-de Alwis, R., & Hartmann, E. (2008). The use of tacit knowledge within innovative companies: Knowledge management in innovative enterprises. Journal of Knowledge Management, 12(1), 133–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Staničkova, M., & Melecky, L. (2011). Hodnocení konkurenceschopnosti visegrádské čtyřky prostřednictvím aplikace CCR vstupově orientovaného modelu analýzy obalu dat. Scientific papers of the University of Pardubice. Series D, Faculty of Economics and Administration, 22(4), 176–188 (in Czech).

    Google Scholar 

  • Stejskal, J., & Hajek, P. (2016). Measuring the effectiveness of cooperative ties in knowledge networks. In European Conference on Knowledge Management (pp. 831–839). UK: Academic Conferences International Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stejskal, J., Merickova, M. B., & Prokop, V. (2016). The cooperation between enterprises: Significant part of the innovation process—A case study of the Czech machinery industry. E a M: Ekonomie a Management, 19(3), 110–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taruté, A., & Gatautis, R. (2014). ICT impact on SMEs performance. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 110, 1218–1225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tavassoli, S. (2015). Innovation determinants over industry life cycle. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 91, 18–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tödtling, F., & Trippl, M. (2005). One size fits all? Towards a differentiated regional innovation policy approach. Research Policy, 34(8), 1203–1219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsai, K.-H., & Wang, J-Ch. (2009). External technology sourcing and innovation performance in LMT sectors: An analysis based on the Taiwanese technological innovation survey. Research Policy, 38(3), 518–526.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ulusoy, G., Kilic, K., Gunday, G., & Alpkan, L. (2014). Intellectual capital and organizational culture: Two major determinants of innovativeness in manufacturing firms. International Journal of Innovation and Regional Development, 6(2), 125–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Villar, C., Alegre, J., & Pla-Barber, J. (2014). Exploring the role of knowledge management practices on exports: A dynamic capabilities view. International Business Review, 23(1), 38–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, C., Rodan, S., Fruin, M., & Xu, X. (2014). Knowledge networks, collaboration networks, and exploratory innovation. Academy of Management Journal, 57(2), 484–514.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, E. C., & Huang, W. (2007). Relative efficiency of R&D activities: A cross-country study accounting for environmental factors in the DEA approach. Research Policy, 36(2), 260–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, J., & Shanley, M. T. (2009). Knowledge stock, exploration, and innovation: Research on the United States electromedical device industry. Journal of Business Research, 62(4), 474–483.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yanadori, Y., & Cui, V. (2013). Creating incentives for innovation? The relationship between pay dispersion in R&D groups and firm innovation performance. Strategic Management Journal, 34(12), 1502–1511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by a grant provided by the scientific research project of the Czech Sciences Foundation Grant No: 17-11795S.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Viktor Prokop .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Prokop, V., Stejskal, J., Hajek, P. (2018). Effectiveness of Selected Knowledge-Based Determinants in Macroeconomics Development of EU 28 Economies. In: Tan, LM., Lau Poh Hock, E., Tang, C. (eds) Finance & Economics Readings. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-8147-7_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics