Abstract
We used a Delphi consensus-based approach to identify priorities for developing a research, action, and advocacy agenda for quality of care in family planning in India. The primary objective of this effort was to build a consensus among key stakeholders about research, action, and advocacy priorities to improve quality of care in family planning in India. The process included an exhaustive search using complementary approaches to identify potential research questions, and two Delphi rounds to select the priorities for developing the research, action, and advocacy agenda. This chapter presents key priorities identified through the Delphi process and qualitative inputs received from the participants. This exercise helped in soliciting inputs from a large number of individuals across diverse locations and areas of expertise. The names of participants were kept anonymous to avoid bias or domination in the process of prioritization of the quality of care agenda (research, action, and advocacy) by experts.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Reference
Boulkedid, R., Abdoul, H., Loustau, M., Sibony, O., & Alberti, C. (2011). Using and reporting the Delphi method for selecting healthcare quality indicators: A systematic review. PLoS ONE, 6(6), e20476. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0020476.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Satia, J., Chauhan, K. (2018). Consensus Building on Quality of Care Priorities. In: Improving Quality of Care in Family Planning. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-8132-3_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-8132-3_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-8131-6
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-8132-3
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)