Review of Research Studies

  • Jay Satia
  • Kavita Chauhan


In this chapter, we discuss peer-reviewed as well as other available research studies on quality of care in family planning in India. We have classified research studies in one or more of the following categories depending upon their major focus: status of quality of care; interventions to improve quality of care; factors influencing quality of care; and impact of improved quality of care. Evidence-based interventions to accelerate improvements in quality of care need to be implemented through an appropriate research agenda to enhance progress towards realizing India’s family planning programme goals.


Evidence based Informed choice Reproductive rights Factors influencing quality Impact of quality of care 


  1. Achyut, P., Mishra, A., Montana, L., Sengupta, R., Calhoun, L. M., & Nanda, P. (2016). Integration of family planning with maternal health services: An opportunity to increase postpartum modern contraceptive use in urban Uttar Pradesh, India. Journal of Family Planning and Reproductive Health Care, 42(2), 107–115. Scholar
  2. Anand, B., Singh, J., & Mohi, M. (2010). Study of unmet need for family planning in immunisation clinic of a teaching hospital at Patiala, India. Internet Journal of Health, 11(1), 23–24.Google Scholar
  3. Anand, S., & Sinha, R. K. (2010). Quality differentials and reproductive health service utilisation determinants in India. International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance, 23(8), 718–729.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Angeles, G., Dietrich, J., Guilkey, D., Mancini, D., Mroz, T., Tsui, A., et al. (2001). A meta-analysis of the impact of family planning programs on fertility preferences, contraceptive method choice and fertility. Washington, D.C.: MEASURE Evaluation, USAID.Google Scholar
  5. Angeles, G., Guilkey, D. K., & Mroz, T. A. (1998). Purposive program placement and the estimation of family planning program effects in Tanzania. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 93, 884–899.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Askew, I., & Brady, M. (2013). Reviewing the evidence and identifying gaps in family planning research: The unfinished agenda to meet FP2020 goals. Background document for the Family Planning Research Donor Meeting, Washington, D.C., December 3–4, 2012.Google Scholar
  7. Assaf, S., Wang, W., & Mallick, L. (2017). Quality of care in family planning services in Senegal and their outcomes. BMC Health Services Research, 17(1), 346. Scholar
  8. Barden-O’Fallon, J., Speizer, I. S., Calhoun, L. M., Montana, L., & Nanda, P. (2014). Understanding patterns of temporary method use among urban women from Uttar Pradesh, India. BMC Public Health, 14, 1018.Google Scholar
  9. Barge, S., & Ramachandar, L. (1999). Provider-client interaction in primary health care: A case study from Madhya Pradesh. In M. A. Koenig & M. E. Khan (Eds.), Improving quality of care in India’s family welfare programme. New York: Population Council.Google Scholar
  10. Belaid, L., Dumont, A., Chaillet, N., De Brouwere, V., Zertal, A., Hounton, S., et al. (2015). Protocol for a systematic review on the effect of demand generation interventions on uptake and use of modern contraceptives in LMIC. Systematic Reviews, 4, 124. Scholar
  11. Bertrand, J. T., Magnani, R. J., & Rutenberg, N. (1996). Evaluating family planning programs with adaptations for reproductive health. Washington, D.C.: The Evaluation Project, USAID.Google Scholar
  12. Bhatia, J.C., & John C. (1999). Health-seeking behaviour of married women and costs incurred: An analysis of prospective data. In S. Pachauri and S. Subramanian (eds), Implementing a reproductive health agenda in India: The beginning. New Delhi: Population Council.Google Scholar
  13. Brault, M. A., Schensul, S. L., Singh, R., Verma, R. K., & Jadhav, K. (2016). Multilevel perspectives on female sterilization in low-income communities in Mumbai, India. Qualitative Health Research, 26(11), 1550–1560. Scholar
  14. Bruce, J. (1990). Fundamental elements of the quality of care: A simple framework. Studies in Family Planning, 21(2), 61–91.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Calhoun, L. M., Speizer, I. S., Rimal, R., Sripad, P., Chatterjee, N., Achyut, P., et al. (2013). Provider imposed restrictions to clients’ access to family planning in urban Uttar Pradesh, India: A mixed methods study. BMC Health Services Research, 13, 532. Scholar
  16. Campbell, O. M., Benova, L., Macleod, D., Goodman, C., Footman, K., Pereira, A. L., et al. (2015). Who, what, where: An analysis of private sector family planning provision in 57 low- and middle-income countries. Tropical Medicine & International Health, 20(12), 1639–1656. Scholar
  17. Chavane, L., Dgedge, M., Bailey, P., Loquiha, O., Aerts, M., & Temmerman, M. (2017). Assessing women’s satisfaction with family planning services in Mozambique. Journal of Family Planning and Reproductive Health Care, 43(3), 222–228. Scholar
  18. Chin-Quee, D., Mugeni, C., Nkunda, D., Uwizeye, M. R., Stockton, L. L., & Wesson, J. (2016). Balancing workload, motivation and job satisfaction in Rwanda: Assessing the effect of adding family planning service provision to community health worker duties. Reproductive Health, 13, 2. Scholar
  19. Chowdhury, J., Lairenlakpam, M., & Das, A. (2010). Have the Supreme Court guidelines made a difference? A study of quality of care of women’s sterilization in five states. New Delhi: Centre for Health and Social Justice.Google Scholar
  20. Cleland, J., Bernstein, S., Ezeh, A., Faundes, A., Glasier, A., & Innis, J. (2006). Family planning: The unfinished agenda. Lancet, 368(9549), 1810–1827.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Darney, B. G., Saavedra-Avendano, B., Sosa-Rubi, S. G., Lozano, R., & Rodriguez, M. I. (2016). Comparison of family-planning service quality reported by adolescents and young adult women in Mexico. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 134(1), 22–28. Scholar
  22. Das, A., & Contractor, S. (2014). India’s latest sterilisation camp massacre. BMJ, 349, g7282. Scholar
  23. Debroy, S. (2016). 10 dead after female sterilization in 1 year. Times of India. Accessed January 28, 2018.
  24. Dehlendorf, C., Henderson, J. T., Vittinghoff, E., Grumbach, K., Levy, K., Schmittdiel, J., et al. (2016). Association of the quality of interpersonal care during family planning counseling with contraceptive use. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 215(1), 78.e1–9.
  25. Dwivedi, S. N., & Sundaram, K. R. (2001). National family health survey and children. Indian Journal of Pediatrics, 68(11), 1047.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Fotso, J. C., Speizer, I. S., Mukiira, C., Kizito, P., & Lumumba, V. (2013). Closing the poor-rich gap in contraceptive use in urban Kenya: Are family planning programs increasingly reaching the urban poor? International Journal for Equity in Health, 12(71).
  27. Halpern, V., Lopez, L. M., Grimes, D. A., & Gallo, M. F. (2011). Strategies to improve adherence and acceptability of hormonal methods of contraception. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 4, CD004317.
  28. Higgins, J. A., Kramer, R. D., & Ryder, K. M. (2016). Provider bias in long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) promotion and removal: Perceptions of young adult women. American Journal of Public Health, 106(11), 1932–1937.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  29. Holt, K., Caglia, J. M., Peca, E., Sherry, J. M., & Langer, A. A. (2017). Call for collaboration on respectful, person-centered health care in family planning and maternal health. Reproductive Health, 14(1), 20. Scholar
  30. Jain, A. (2001). Implications for evaluating the impact of family planning programs with a reproductive health orientation. Studies in Family Planning, 32(3), 220–229.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Jain, A. K. (2016). Examining progress and equity in information received by women using a modern method in 25 developing countries. International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 42(3), 131–140.Google Scholar
  32. Jain, A. K., Obare, F., RamaRao, S., & Askew, I. (2013). Reducing unmet need by supporting women with met need. International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 133–141.Google Scholar
  33. Jain, A. K., RamaRao, S., Kim, J., & Costello, M. (2012). Evaluation of an intervention to improve quality of care in family planning programme in the Philippines. Journal of Biosocial Science, 44(1), 27–41. Scholar
  34. Jain, A. K., & Ross, J. A. (2012). Fertility differences among developing countries: Are they still related to family planning program efforts and social settings? International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 38(1), 15–22. Scholar
  35. Jayachandran, V., Chapotera, G., & Stones, W. (2016). Quality of facility-based family planning services for adolescents in Malawi: Findings from a national census of health facilities. Malawi Medical Journal, 28(2), 48–52.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  36. Jejeebhoy, S. J., Santhya, K. G., Singh, S. K., et al. (2014). Provision of reproductive and sexual health services to adolescents and youth in India: The perspectives of health care providers. New Delhi: Population Council.Google Scholar
  37. Kaboré, S., Savadogo, L. B., Méda, Z. C., Bakouan, K., Lankoandé, E., Zongo, B., et al. (2016). Local culture and community participation: Djandioba family planning day in Burkina Faso. Sante Publique, 28(6), 817–826.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Koenig, M. A., & Khan, M. E. (Eds.). (1999). Improving quality of care in India’s family welfare programme. New York: Population Council.Google Scholar
  39. León, F. R., Lundgren, R., Huapaya, A., Sinai, I., & Jennings, V. (2007). Challenging the courtesy bias interpretation of favorable clients’ perceptions of family planning delivery. Evaluation Review, 31(1), 24–42.Google Scholar
  40. Madhavan, S., & Bishai, D. (2010). Private sector engagement in sexual and reproductive health and maternal and neonatal health: A review of the evidence. London: Department for International Development.Google Scholar
  41. Masho, S. W., Cha, S., Charles, R., McGee, E., Karjane, N., Hines, L., et al. (2016). Postpartum visit attendance increases the use of modern contraceptives. Journal of Pregnancy. Scholar
  42. Melka, A. S., Tekelab, T., & Wirtu, D. (2015). Determinants of long acting and permanent contraceptive methods utilization among married women of reproductive age groups in western Ethiopia: A cross-sectional study. Pan African Medical Journal, 21, 246. Scholar
  43. Mishra, S. R., Joshi, M. P., & Khanal, V. (2014). Family planning knowledge and practice among people living with HIV in Nepal. PLoS ONE, 9(2), e88663. Scholar
  44. Msovela, J., & Tengia-Kessy, A. (2016). Implementation and acceptability of strategies instituted for engaging men in family planning services in Kibaha district, Tanzania. Reproductive Health, 13(1), 138.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  45. Mugore, S., Kassouta, N. T., Sebikali, B., Lundstrom, L., & Saad, A. (2016). Improving the quality of postabortion care services in Togo: Increased uptake of contraception. Global Health: Science and Practice, 4(3), 495–505.
  46. Murthy, N. (1999) “The quality of family welfare services in rural Maharashtra: Insights from a client survey,” in Improving Quality of Care in India’s Family Welfare Programme: The Challenge Ahead,eds.M.A. Koenig and M.E. Khan. New York: Population Council, pp. 33–48.Google Scholar
  47. Mwaikambo, L., Speizer, I. S., Schurmann, A., Morgan, G., & Fikree, F. (2011). What works in family planning interventions: A systematic review. Studies in Family Planning, 42, 67–82. Scholar
  48. Nair, H., & Panda, R. (2011). Quality of maternal healthcare in India: Has the National Rural Health Mission made a difference? Journal of Global Health, 1, 79–86.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  49. Pandey, S. (2016). Assessment of efficacy of FP counselors program in Bihar. Paper presented at the International Conference on Family Planning, Nusa Dua, Indonesia, January 25–28.Google Scholar
  50. Pandey, S., Kannubhai, T. H., Rawat, C. M., Jha, S. K., & Awasthi, S. (2013). Socio-demographic factors influencing family size among rural population of district Nainital, Uttarakhand. Indian Journal of Community Health, 24(4), 291–296.Google Scholar
  51. PFI (Population Foundation of India). (2014). Robbed of choice and dignity: Indian women dead after mass sterilisation. Situational assessment of sterilisation camps in Bilaspur district, Chhattisgarh. Reproductive Health Matters, 22(44), 91–93.Google Scholar
  52. Phukan N. (2015, 3 June). Community based monitoring on quality of care in family planning service. COPASAH.Google Scholar
  53. RamaRao, S., & Mohanam, R. (2003). The quality of family planning programs: Concepts, measurements, interventions, and effects. Studies in Family Planning, 34(4), 227–248.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Rattan, J., Noznesky, E., Curry, D. W., Galavotti, C., Hwang, S., & Rodriguez, M. (2016). Rapid contraceptive uptake and changing method mix with high use of long-acting reversible contraceptives in crisis-affected populations in Chad and the Democratic Republic of the Congo. Global Health: Science and Practice, 4(Suppl. 2), S5–S20. Scholar
  55. Roy, T. K., & Verma, R. K. (1999). Women’s perceptions of the quality of family welfare services in four Indian states. In M. A. Koenig & M. E. Khan (Eds.), Improving quality of care in India’s family welfare programme (pp. 19–32). New York: Population Council.Google Scholar
  56. Sangraula, M., Garbers, S., Garth, J., Shakibnia, E. B., Timmons, S., & Gold, M. A. (2017). Integrating long-acting reversible contraception services into New York City school-based health centers: Quality improvement to ensure provision of youth-friendly services. Journal of Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology, 30(3), 376–382. Scholar
  57. Schwandt, H. M., Speizer, I. S., & Corroon, M. (2017). Contraceptive service provider imposed restrictions to contraceptive access in urban Nigeria. BMC Health Services Research, 17(1), 268. Scholar
  58. Scott, B., Alam, D., & Raman, S. (2011). Factors affecting acceptance of vasectomy in Uttar Pradesh: Insights from community-based, participatory qualitative research. RESPOND Project Study Series, Contributions to global knowledge—Report No. 3. New York: EngenderHealth/RESPOND Project.Google Scholar
  59. Singh, A., Chalasani, S., Koenig, M. A., & Mahapatra, B. (2012). The consequences of unintended births for maternal and child health in India. Population Studies, 66(3), 223–239 (Factors influencing mistimed and unwanted pregnancies among Nepali women).Google Scholar
  60. Sowmini, C. V. (1999). A study on the self-reported reproductive morbidity in the context of contraceptive use and analysis of service determinants of reproductive morbidity (MPH dissertation). Achutha Menon Centre for Health Sciences, Thiruvananthapuram.Google Scholar
  61. Speizer, I. S., Corroon, M., Calhoun, L., Lance, P., Montana, L., Nanda, P., et al. (2014). Demand generation activities and modern contraceptive use in urban areas of four countries: A longitudinal evaluation. Global Health: Science and Practice, 2(4), 410–426.Google Scholar
  62. Speizer, I. S., & Lance, P. (2015). Fertility desires, family planning use and pregnancy experience: Longitudinal examination of urban areas in three African countries. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 15, 294. Scholar
  63. Stephenson, R., Bartel, D., & Rubardt, M. (2012). Constructs of power and equity and their association with contraceptive use among men and women in rural Ethiopia and Kenya. Global Public Health, 7(6), 618–634.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Sundari, T. K. (1999). women’s experiences with the family planning program in Tamil Nadu in Improving Quality of Care in India’s Family Welfare Programme:The Challenge Ahead,eds.M.A. Koenig and M.E. Khan. New York: Population Council.Google Scholar
  65. Tappis, H., Kazi, A., Hameed, W., Dahar, Z., Ali, A., & Agha, S. (2015). The role of quality health services and discussion about birth spacing in postpartum contraceptive use in Sindh, Pakistan: A multilevel analysis. PLoS ONE, 10(10), e0139628. Scholar
  66. Teshome, A., Birara, M., & Rominski, S. D. (2017). Quality of family planning counseling among women attending prenatal care at a hospital in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 137(2), 174–179. Scholar
  67. Tumlinson, K., Pence, B. W., Curtis, S. L., Marshall, S. W., & Speizer, I. S. (2015). Quality of care and contraceptive use in Urban Kenya. International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 41(2), 69–79. Scholar
  68. Vermandere, H., Galle, A., Griffin, S., de Melo, M., Machaieie, L., Van Braeckel, D., et al. (2017). The impact of facility audits, evaluation reports and incentives on motivation and supply management among family planning service providers: An interventional study in two districts in Maputo Province, Mozambique. BMC Health Services Research, 17(1), 313. Scholar
  69. Visaria, P., & Visaria, L. (1994) Demographic transition: accelerating fertility decline in 1980s. ECONOMIC AND POLITICAL WEEKLY. 1994 Dec 17-24; 29(51-52):3, 281–92.Google Scholar
  70. Wasnik, V. R., Jawarkar, A. K., & Dhumale, D. M. (2013). Study of family planning practices with special reference to unmet need among married women in rural area of Amravati district of Maharashtra. Indian Journal of Community Health, 25(4), 348–353.Google Scholar
  71. Yadav, D., & Dhillon, P. (2015). Assessing the impact of family planning advice on unmet need and contraceptive use among currently married women in Uttar Pradesh, India. PLoS ONE, 10(3), e0118584. Scholar
  72. Yinger, N. V. (1998). Unmet need for family planning: Reflecting women’s perceptions. Washington, D. C.: International Center for Research on Women.Google Scholar
  73. Yore, J., Dasgupta, A., Ghule, M., Battala, M., Nair, S., Silverman, J., et al. (2016). CHARM, A gender equity and family planning intervention for men and couples in rural India: Protocol for the cluster randomized controlled trial evaluation. Reproductive Health, 13, 14. Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Indian Institute of Public Health GandhinagarGandhinagarIndia
  2. 2.Public Health Foundation of IndiaGurgaonIndia

Personalised recommendations