Skip to main content

Overview of Science, Technology and Innovation Development in Russia

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
BRICS Innovative Competitiveness Report 2017
  • The paper is based on the materials and results of studies obtained in the framework of implementation of the project UNESCO Science Report 2015 (Gokhberg and Kuznetsova 2015), as well as author’s works in the field of international science and technology cooperation.
  • The original version of this chapter was revised: The affiliation of authors “L. Gokhberg, T. Kuznetsova, and A. Pikalova” was changed. The correction to this chapter is available at https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-8078-4_13

Abstract

The Russian Federation faces a variety of challenges in securing adequate investment in new knowledge and technologies and deriving socio-economic benefit from them. The global financial crisis of 2008 and the ensuing stagnation were exacerbating domestic weaknesses, such as the limited market competition and persistent barriers to entrepreneurship, which were hampering the growth of the Russian economy. Despite some reforms since, these challenges have intensified since mid-2014.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Change history

  • 28 November 2018

    In the original version of the book, the affiliation of authors “S. Shashnov, M. Kotsemir, A. Grebenyuk, L. Gokhberg , T. Kuznetsova, and A. Pikalova” was incorrect in chapters 2 and 5.

Notes

  1. 1.

    Including the Presidential Decree on the Approval of the Priority Areas for the Development of Science and Technology and the List of Critical Technologies (2011), the Strategy for Innovative Development to 2020 (2012), the State Programme for Development of Science and Technology, 2013–2020 and the Federal Goal-oriented Programme on Research and Development in Priority Areas of Russia’s Science and Technology Complex (2012).

  2. 2.

    Roughly 60% of Russian researchers work in Moscow, the Moscow Region and St Petersburg. Six other regions together account for about 20%: Nizhny Novgorod, Ekaterinburg, Novosibirsk, Rostov, Tyumen and Krasnodar.

  3. 3.

    This programme provides schools, colleges and universities with full-scale financing for equipment procurement, offers subsidies to the best secondary schools and technical colleges, finances advanced teachers’ training, etc.

  4. 4.

    Including St Petersburg Polytechnic, the Far-East Federal University and three national research universities: the Higher School of Economics; Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology; and Moscow Institute of Engineering and Physics.

  5. 5.

    See: http://engineer-cadry.ru.

  6. 6.

    Not to be confused with the Russian Foundation for Basic Research, set up in 1993 to issue grants for basic research.

  7. 7.

    The Russian Foundation for Basic Research, the Russian Foundation for Humanities and the Foundation for Assistance to Small Innovative Enterprises were all set up in the early 1990s.

  8. 8.

    In 2015, it was renamed the Federal Corporation for the Development of Small and Medium Enterprises, a public company with 100% state ownership.

  9. 9.

    Prior to the reform of 2013, there were six Russian academies: the Academies of Sciences; Medical Sciences; Agricultural Sciences; Education; the Arts; and Architecture and Construction Services.

  10. 10.

    Such as bionanotechnology, neurobiology, bioinformatics, etc.

  11. 11.

    Some technoparks were not able to fulfil their mission and achieve the prescribed objectives (measured in terms of highly skilled jobs created, turnover of goods produced and services rendered to resident businesses, completed projects, etc.). See: http://nptechnopark.ru/upload/spravka.pdf.

  12. 12.

    See: http://europa.eu/newsroom/highlights/special-coverage/eu_sanctions/index_en.htm#5.

  13. 13.

    The 2017 call for proposals of basic research projects held by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research jointly with organisations participating in the BRICS Framework Science, Technology and Innovation Programme.

  14. 14.

    Daya Bay neutrino oscillation facility’s official website [Electronic resource]. Access mode: http://dayabay.ihep.ac.cn/twiki/bin/view/Public/.

References

  • Dekhtyaruk, Y., Karyshev, I., Korableva, M., Velikanova, N., Edelkina, A., Karasev, O., et al. (2014). Foresight in civil shipbuilding—2030. ForesightRussia, 8(2), 30–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gershman, M., & Kuznetsova, T. (2013). The ‘effective’ contract in science: the model’s parameters. ForesightRussia, 7(3), 26–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gershman, M., & Kuznetsova, T. (2014). Performance-related pay in the Russian R&D sector. ForesightRussia, 8(3), 58–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • GII. (2016). The Global Innovation Index 2016: Winning with Global Innovation. Ithaca/Fontainebleau/Geneva: Cornell University/INSEAD/WIPO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gokhberg, L. (Ed.). (2016). Russia 2030: science and technology foresight. Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation, National Research University Higher School of Economics, Moscow.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gokhberg, L., Kitova, G., Kuznetsova, T., & Zaichenko, S. (2011). Science policy: A global context and Russian practice. Moscow: Higher School of Economics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gokhberg, L., & Kuznetsova, T. (2010). Russian Federation. In UNESCO science report 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gokhberg, L., & Kuznetsova, T. (2011a). Strategy2020: A new framework for innovation policy. ForesightRussia, 5(4), 40–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gokhberg, L., & Kuznetsova, T. (2011b). S&T and innovation in Russia: Key challenges of the post-crisis period. Journal of East-West Business, 17(2–3), 73–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gokhberg, L., & Kuznetsova, T. (2015). Russian Federation. The UNESCO science report: Towards 2030 (pp. 342–363). Paris: UNESCO.

    Google Scholar 

  • HSE. (2014a). Education in figures: 2014. Brief data book. Moscow: Higher School of Economics.

    Google Scholar 

  • HSE. (2014b). Science. Innovation. Information society: 2014. Brief data book. Moscow: Higher School of Economics.

    Google Scholar 

  • HSE. (2014c). Education in the Russian Federation: 2014. Data book. Moscow: Higher School of Economics.

    Google Scholar 

  • HSE. (2017a). Science indicators: 2017. Data book. Moscow: Higher School of Economics.

    Google Scholar 

  • HSE. (2017b). Indicators of innovation activities: 2017. Data book. Uses OECD data. Moscow: Higher School of Economics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuznetsova, T. (2013). Russia. In V. Scerri & H. M. M. Lastres (Eds.), BRICS national system of innovation. The role of the state. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuznetsova, T., Roud, V., & Zaichenko, S. (2014) Interaction between Russian enterprises and scientific organizations in the field of innovation. Foresight—Russia, 8(1), 2–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Finance. (2014). Execution of the federal budget and budget system of the Russian Federation. Moscow.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2011). Towards green growth. Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2014). Main science and technology indicators (Vol. 2014, Issue 1). Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2016). Main science and technology indicators (Vol. 2014, Issue 2). Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putin, V. (2012). We need a new economy. Vedomosty. January 30, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosstat—Russian Federal Statistical Service. (2015). Russian Statistical Yearbook: 2015. Moscow.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schiermeier, Q. (2015). Russian science minister explains radical restructure. Nature.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shashnov, S., & Grebenyuk, A. (2011). Science and technology priorities for modernization of Russian Economy. ForesightRussia, 5(2), 48–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sokolov, A. (2013). Foresight in Russia: Implications for policy making. In D. Meissner, L. Gokhberg & A. Sokolov (Eds.), Science, technology and innovation policy for the future: Potential and limits of foresight studies. Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokolov, A., & Chulok, A. (2016). Priorities for future innovation: Russian S&T Foresight 2030. Futures, 80, 17–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stone, R. (2014). Embattled president seeks new path for Russian academy. Science. http://news.sciencemag.org.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alexander Sokolov .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Social Sciences Academic Press and Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Gokhberg, L., Kuznetsova, T., Pikalova, A., Sokolov, A. (2018). Overview of Science, Technology and Innovation Development in Russia. In: Zhao, X., Li, M., Huang, M., Sokolov, A. (eds) BRICS Innovative Competitiveness Report 2017. Research Series on the Chinese Dream and China’s Development Path. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-8078-4_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics