Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Ergonomics and Human Factors for a Sustainable Future pp 77–110Cite as

Palgrave Macmillan

Human Factors Issues in Responsible Computer Consumption

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

  • 890 Accesses

Abstract

Energy is wasted when individuals do not practise responsible computer consumption behaviour (RCCB) such as turning off idling computers or using power-management tools. This study aims to determine the key human factors and ergonomics (HFE) issues influencing RCCB so as to provide recommendations to change users’ behaviour. A model was developed based on the Theory of Planned Behaviour and HFE literature. A questionnaire was designed, tested and finalised, and samples were collected and analysed. The findings reveal significant HFE factors such as self-efficacy, positive attitudes, collectivist and personal benefits, self-identity and habit. Recommendations include a steeper stepwise electricity tariff; government social messages such as saving money, prolonging computer life, making a difference and attaining collective benefits; and education in calculating the monetary savings from energy saved.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ajzen, I. (2011). The theory of planned behaviour: Reactions and reflections. Psychology & Health, 26, 1113–1127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrae, A. S. G., & Andersen, O. (2010). Life cycle assessments of consumer electronics – Are they consistent. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 15, 827–836.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Antil, J. H. (1984). Socially responsible consumers: Profile and implication for public policy. Journal of Macromarketing, 4(Fall), 18–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armitage, C. J., & Conner, M. (2001). Efficacy of the theory of planned behavior: A meta-analytic review. British Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 471–499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asia Pacific. (n.d.). Internet world stats – Usage and population statistics. Retrieved from: http://www.internetworldstats.com/stats3.htm

  • Baker, J. P., & Ozaki, R. (2008). Pro-environmental products: Marketing influence on consumer purchase decision. Journal Consumer Market, 25, 281–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnatt, C. (n.d.). Green computing. http://www.explainingcomputers.com/green.html. Accessed 5 Sept 2014.

  • Bissell, S. J., Duda, M. D., & Young, K. C. (1998). Recent studies on hunting and fishing participation in the United States. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 3, 75–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burkotler, D., Weyers, B., Kluge, A., & Luther, W. (2014). Customization of user interfaces to reduce errors and enhance user acceptance. Applied Ergonomics, 45, 346–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, N. H., & Huang, S. C. T. (2016). Domestic technology adoption: Comparison of innovation adoption models and moderators. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries, 26, 177–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conner, M., & Armitage, C. J. (1998). Extending the theory of planned behavior: A review and avenues for further research. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 28, 1429–1464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costanza, R., & Patten, B. C. (1995). Defining and predicting sustainability. Ecological Economics, 15, 193–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costello, A. B., & Osborne, J. W. (2005). Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 10(7), 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, P. M., Betts, R. A., Jones, C. D., Spall, S. A., & Totterdell, I. J. (2000). Acceleration of global warming due to carbon-cycle feedbacks in a coupled climate model. Nature, 408, 184–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dahlstrand, U., & Biel, A. (1997). Pro-environmental habits: Propensity levels in behavioral change. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 27, 588–601.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies, J., Foxall, G. R., & Pallister, J. (2002). Beyond the intention–behavior mythology: An integrated model of recycling. Market Theory, 2, 29–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Department of Statistics Malaysia. (2015). ICT use and access by individuals and households survey report, Malaysia. https://www.statistics.gov.my/index.php?r=column/cthemeByCat&cat=395&bul_id=Q3l3WXJFbG1PNjRwcHZQTVlSR1UrQT09&menu_id=amVoWU54UTl0a21NWmdhMjFMMWcyZz09

  • Dillon, A. (2001). User acceptance of information technology. In W. Karwowski (Ed.), Encyclopedia of human factors and ergonomics. London: Taylor and Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durugbo, C. (2013). Improving information recognition and performance of recycling chimneys. Ergonomics, 56, 409–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Egmond, C., & Bruel, R. (2007). Nothing is as practical as a good theory, analysis of theories and a tool for developing interventions to influence energy-related behavior. SenterNovem, 16 pp. http://www.cres.gr/behave/pdf/paper_final_draft_CE1309.pdf. Accessed 13 July 2015.

  • Elkington, J. (1997). Cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st century business. Oxford: Capstone Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • eMarketer. (2012). China’s key internet stats rival the US and Japan. http://www.emarketer.com/Article.aspx?R=1008899&ecid=a6506033675d47f881651943c21c5ed4

  • Eriksson, L., Garvill, J., & Nordlund, A. M. (2008). Interrupting habitual car use: The importance of car habit strength and moral motivation for personal car use education. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 11, 10–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Field, A. P. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS: And sex and drugs and rock ‘n’ roll. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flemming, S. A. C., Hilliard, A., & Jamieson, G. A. (2008). The need for human factors in the sustainability domain. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 52nd Annual Meeting, 748–752.

    Google Scholar 

  • Follows, S. B., & Jobber, D. (2000). Environmentally responsible purchase behavior: A test of a consumer. European Journal of Marketing, 34(5/6), 723–746.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, S., & Ogden, D. T. (2009). To buy or not to buy? A social dilemma perspective on green buying. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 26(6), 376–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hagger, M. S., Anderson, M., Kyriakaki, M., & Darkings, S. (2007). Aspects of identity and their influence on intentional behavior: Comparing effects for three health behaviors. Personality and Individual Differences, 42, 355–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2011). PLS-SEM: Indeed a silver bullet. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 19, 139–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansla, A. (2011). Value orientation, awareness of consequences, and environmental concern. University of Gothenburg, Sweden, 2011, 1–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanson, M. A. (2013). Green ergonomics: Challenges and opportunities. Ergonomics, 56, 399–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harun, R., Lim, K. H., & Othman, F. (2011). Environmental knowledge and attitude among students in Sabah. World Applied Sciences Journal, 14, 83–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, J., Thorpe, N., & Fairchild, R. (2013). Attitudes towards and perceptions of eco driving and the role of feedback systems. Ergonomics, 56, 507–521.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haslam, R., & Waterson, P. (2013). Editorial: Ergonomics and sustainability. Ergonomics, 56, 343–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haslam, R. A. (2002). Targeting ergonomics interventions-learning from health promotion. Applied Ergonomics, 33, 241–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henion, K. E. (1976). Ecological marketing. Columbus, OH: Grid.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holden, R. J. (2012). Social and personal normative influences on healthcare professionals to use information technology: Towards a more robust social ergonomics. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 13, 546–569.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hopkinson, L., & James, P. (2011). Lifecycle energy and environmental impacts of computing equipment: A June 2011 update to a 2009 SusteIT Report. http://www.goodcampus.org/files/files/57LCA_of_computing_equipment_v7_final_June_2011.pdf

  • Index Mundi. (2014). Malaysia age structure – Population pyramid. http://www.indexmundi.com/malaysia/age_structure.html. Accessed 8 July 2015.

  • International Ergonomics Association. (2015). Definitions and domain ergonomics. http://www.iea.cc/whats/

  • Jackson, T. L. S., & Johnson, A. E. (2002). Cultural ergonomics in Ghana, West Africa: A descriptive survey of industry and trade workers’ interpretations of safety symbols. International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics, 8, 37–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaufmann, H. R., Panni, M. F., & Orphanidou, Y. (2012). Factors affecting consumers’ green purchasing behavior: An integrated conceptual framework. Amfiteatru Economic, 14, 50–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, S. S., Malhotra, N. K., & Narasimhan, S. (2005). Two competing perspectives on automatic use: A theoretical and empirical comparison. Information Systems Research, 16, 418–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, Y., & Choi, S. R. (2005). Antecedents of green purchase behavior: An examination of collectivism, environmental concern and PCE. Advances in Consumer Research, 32, 592–599.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klockner, C. A. (2013). A comprehensive model of the psychology of environmental behaviour—A meta-analysis. Global Environmental Change, 23, 1028–1038.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kobus, C. B., Mugge, R., & Schoormans, J. P. (2013). Washing when the sun is shining! How users interact with a household energy management system. Ergonomics, 56, 451–462.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kothaneth, S. (2010). A pilot study on the cross-cultural acceptance of technology. Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting Proceedings 09/2010 54, 1951–1955.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kowalewski, S., Borg, A., Kluge, J., Himmel, S., Trevisan, B., Erabme, D., Ziefle, M., & Jakobs, M. (2014, July 19–23). Modeling the influence of human factors on the perception of renewable energies. Taking geothermics as example. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics AHFE 2014, Krakow, Poland, 1884–1891.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, K. (2008). Opportunities for green marketing: Young consumers. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 26, 573–586.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, K. (2011). The green purchase behavior of Hong Kong young consumers: The role of peer influence, local environmental involvement, and concrete environmental knowledge. Journal of International Consumer Marketing, 23, 21–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Limayem, M., Hirt, S. G., & Cheung, C. M. K. (2007). How habit limits the predictive power of intentions: The case of IS continuance. MIS Quarterly, 31, 705–737.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lockton, D., Harrison, D., & Stanton, N. A. (2010). The design with intent method: A design tool for influencing user behavior. Applied Ergonomics, 41, 382392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, K., Legg, S., & Brown, C. (2013). Designing for sustainability: Ergonomics – Carpe diem. Ergonomics, 56, 365–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection. (2002). Barrier/motivation inventory. http://www.state.ma.us. Accessed 10 Aug 2013.

  • McDonagh, D., Bruseberg, A., & Haslam, C. (2002). Visual product evaluation: Exploring users’ emotional relationships with products. Applied Ergonomics, 33, 231–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mida, S. (2009). Factors contributing in the formation of consumer’s environmental consciousness and shaping green purchasing decision. Symposium on Computers & Industrial Engineering, Moncton, 957–962.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moller, B., & Thogersen, J. (2008). Car-use habits: An obstacle to the use of public transportation? In C. Jensen-Butler, B. Madsen, O. A. Nielsen, & B. Sloth (Eds.), Road pricing, the economy, and the environment. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moray, N. (1994, August). Ergonomics and the global problems of the 21st century. Keynote Address Presented at the 12th Triennial Congress of the International Ergonomics Association, Toronto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moray, N. (1995). Ergonomics and the global problems of the twenty first century. Ergonomics, 38, 1691–1707.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Munasinghe, M. (2012). Millennium consumption goals (MCGs) for Rio+20 and beyond: A practical step towards global sustainability. Natural Resources Forum: A United Nations Sustainable Development Journal, 36, 202–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murugesan, S. (2008). Harnessing green IT: Principles and practices. IT Professional Journal, 10, 24–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Energy Foundation, (2007). Assessment of potential for energy savings from PC software management. http://www.1e.com/energycampaign/downloads/1ENEFReport.pdf. Accessed 10 Aug 2013.

  • Ng, Y. C. (2011). Comscore Malaysia segmentation: Which areas have the most internet users? http://www.ibizclicks.com/blog/comscore-malaysia-segmentation/. Accessed 10 Aug 2013.

  • Nordlund, A. M., & Garvill, J. (2002). Value structure behind pro-environmental behavior. Environment and Behavior, 34, 740–756.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ottman, J. A. (2000). It’s not just the environment, stupid. http://www.greenmarketing.com/articles/IB_Sept00.html. Accessed 2 Aug 2013.

  • Ouellette, J. A., & Wood, W. (1998). Habit and intention in everyday life: The multiple processes by which past behavior predicts future behavior. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 54–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oyserman, D., Elmore, K., & Smith, G. (2012). Self, self-concept, and identity. In M. Leary & J. P. Tangney (Eds.), Handbook of self and identity (2nd ed., pp. 69–104). New York: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • PC Energy Report. (2009). The power to save money. http://www.1e.com/EnergyCampaign/downloads/PC_EnergyReport2009-US.pdf. Accessed 29 July 2015.

  • Poortinga, W., Steg, L., & Vlek, C. (2004). Values, environmental concern, and environmental behavior: A study into household energy use. Environment and Behavior, 36, 70–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prothero, A., Dobscha, S., Freund, J., Kilbourne, W. E., Luchs, M. G., Ozanne, L. K., et al. (2011). Sustainable consumption: Opportunities for consumer research and public policy. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 30, 31–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Radjiyev, A., Qiu, H., Xiong, S., & Nam, K. H. (2015). Ergonomics and sustainable development in the past two decades (1992–2011): Research trends and how ergonomics can contribute to sustainable development. Applied Ergonomics, 46A, 67–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rice, G., Wongtada, N., & Leelakulthanit, O. (1996). An investigation of self-efficacy and environmentally concerned behavior of Thai consumers. Journal of International Consumer Marketing, 9, 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ries, F., Hein, V., Pihu, M., & Armenta, J. M. S. (2012). Self-identity as a component of the theory of planned behaviour predicting physical activity. European Physical Education Review, 18(3), 322–334. http://kodu.ut.ee/~vello/Ries.Hein.EPER2012TPB.pdf

  • Rise, J., Sheeran, P., & Hukkelberg, S. (2010). The role of self-identity in the Theory of Planned Behavior: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 40, 1085–1105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rivera, M. E. K., Ganey, H. C. N., Dalton, J., & Hancock, P. A. (2004). Worldview and acculturation as predictors of performance: Addressing these variables in human factors/ergonomics research. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 48th Annual Meeting, 1223–1227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, M., Amick, B. C., III, DeRango, K., Rooney, T., Bazzani, L., Harrist, R., et al. (2009). The effects of an office ergonomics training and chair intervention on worker knowledge, behavior and musculoskeletal risk. Applied Ergonomics, 40, 124–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sauer, J., Wiese, B. S., & Ruttinger, B. (2002). Improving ecological performance of electrical consumer products: The role of design-based measures and user variables. Applied Ergonomics, 33, 297–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schahn, J., & Holzer, E. (1990). Studies of individual environmental concern. The role of knowledge, gender, and background variables. Environment and Behavior, 22, 767–786.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schultz, P. W., & Zelezny, L. C. (1998). Values and pro-environmental behavior: A five country survey. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 29, 540–558.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skarżyńska, K. (2002). Work as a cultural and personal value: Attitudes towards work in Polish society. International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics, 8, 195–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steg, L., & Vlek, C. (2009). Encouraging pro-environmental behavior: An integrative review and research agenda. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29, 309–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stern, P. C. (2000). Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. Journal of Social Issues, 56, 407–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Szalma, J. L. (2014). On the application of motivation theory to human factors/ergonomics: Motivational design principles for human-technology interaction. Human Factors, 56(8), 1453–1471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thang, S. M., & Kumarasamy, P. (2006). Malaysian students’ perceptions of the environment contents in their English language classes. Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 3, 190–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thatcher, A. (2012). Affect in designing for sustainability in human factors and ergonomics. International Journal of Human Factors and Ergonomics, 1, 127–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thatcher, A. (2013). Green ergonomics: Definition and scope. Ergonomics, 56(3), 389–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thatcher, A., & Yeow, P. H. P. (2016a). Human factors for a sustainable future. Applied Ergonomics, 57, 1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thatcher, A., & Yeow, P. H. P. (2016b). A sustainable system of systems approach: A new HFE paradigm. Ergonomics, 59, 167–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The Economist. (2009). Computing climate change. http://www.economist.com/node/14297036. Accessed 10 Sept 2013.

  • Tonglet, M., Philips, P. S., & Read, A. D. (2004). Using the Theory of Planned Behavior to investigate the determinants of recycling behavior: A case study from Brixworth, UK. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 41, 191–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trafimow, D., & Finlay, K. A. (2001). The importance of traits and group memberships. European Journal of Social Psychology, 31, 37–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • TrendMicro. (2012). Trend Micro Study shows increasingly usage behaviour across multiple devices in APAC. http://apac.trendmicro.com/apac/about-us/newsroom/releases/articles/20130314012909.html

  • Urien, B., & Kilbourne, W. (2011). Generativity and self-enhancement values in eco-friendly behavioral intentions and environmentally responsible consumption behavior. Psychology & Marketing, 28, 69–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valle, P. O. D., Rebelo, E., Reis, E., & Menezes, J. (2005). Combining behavioral theories to predict recycling involvement. Environment and Behavior, 37, 364–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y. L., & Xu, X. (2012). Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: Extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS Quarterly, 36, 157–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voorbij, A. I. M., & Steenbekkers, L. P. A. (2002). The twisting force of aged customers when opening a jar. Applied Ergonomics, 33, 105–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webb, D. J., Mohr, L. A., & Harris, K. E. (2008). A re-examination of socially responsible consumption and its measurement. Journal of Business Research, 61(2), 91–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webster, F. E. (1975). Determining the characteristics of socially responsible consumer. Journal of Consumer Research, 2, 188–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wee, S. C., Mohd Soki, B. M. A., Norhayati, Z., Tajudin, M. N. M., Khalid, I., & Ishak, N. (2014). Consumers’ perception, purchase intention and actual purchase behavior of organic food products. Review of Integrative Business & Economics Research, 3, 378–397.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, J. R. (2014). Fundamentals of systems ergonomics/human factors. Applied Ergonomics, 45, 5–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yeow, P. H. P., Yuen, Y. Y., & Loo, W. H. (2013). Ergonomics issues in national identity card for homeland security. Applied Ergonomics, 44, 719–729.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeitlin, L. R. (1994). Failure to follow safety instructions: Faulty communication or risky decisions? The Human Factors, 36, 172–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zink, K. J. (2014). Designing sustainable work systems: The need for a systems approach. Applied Ergonomics, 45, 126–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

The authors thank the Ministry of Higher Education, Malaysia, for funding this research under the Fundamental Research Grant Scheme (FRGS)

(Ref: FRGS/1/2012/SS05/MUSM/02/2). The authors also thank the respondents who participated in this research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Business, Monash University Malaysia, Bandar Sunway, Malaysia

    Paul H. P. Yeow & Wee Hong Loo

  2. Division of Business and Management, United International College, Beijing Normal University-Hong Kong Baptist University, Zhuhai, China

    Uchenna Cyril Eze

Authors
  1. Paul H. P. Yeow
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Wee Hong Loo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Uchenna Cyril Eze
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Psychology Department, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa

    Andrew Thatcher

  2. School of Business, Monash University Malaysia, Bandar Sunway, Malaysia

    Paul H.P. Yeow

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Yeow, P.H.P., Loo, W.H., Eze, U.C. (2018). Human Factors Issues in Responsible Computer Consumption. In: Thatcher, A., Yeow, P. (eds) Ergonomics and Human Factors for a Sustainable Future. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-8072-2_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-8072-2_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-8071-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-8072-2

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation