Abstract
The problems now facing humanity are complex and rapidly evolving. In fact, these problems even threaten our very existence as a species. The sustainable system-of-systems model, which has been developed to help characterise the various different levels of human factors and ergonomics approaches to dealing with these problems, is explained and critiqued this chapter. We then look at the various possible ways to address the “fuzzy boundary” problem of complex adaptive systems for human factors and ergonomics. These possible solutions include the Pareto Principle, Stakeholder Salience Theory, Soft Systems Methodology, and Network Theory. The example of the design of a green building workplace layout is used to illustrate the concepts. The chapter concludes with a critique of what we consider to be the most promising of these solutions at present, the Network Theory.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Ali, S. H. (2004). A socio-ecological autopsy of the E. coli O157: H7 outbreak in Walkerton, Ontario, Canada. Social Science & Medicine, 58, 2601–2612.
Amoroso, L. (1938). Vilfredo Pareto. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 6, 1–21.
Barnhart, M., & Mish, J. (2017). Hippies, hummer owners, and people like me: stereotyping as a means of reconciling ethical consumption values with the DSP. Journal of Macromarketing, 37, 57–71.
Bell, S., & Morse, S. (2004). Experiences with sustainability indicators and stakeholder participation: A case study relating to a ‘Blue Plan’ project in Malta. Sustainable Development, 12, 1–14.
Bergvall-Kåreborn, B., Mirijamdotter, A., & Basden, A. (2004). Basic principles of SSM modeling: An examination of CATWOE from a soft perspective. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 17, 55–73.
Boudeau, C., Wilkin, P., & Dekker, S. W. (2014). Ergonomics as authoritarian or libertarian: Learning from Colin Ward’s politics of design. The Design Journal, 17, 91–114.
Brooks, A. (1998). Ergonomic approaches to office layout and space planning. Facilities, 16, 73–78.
Carayannis, T., Bojicic-Dzelilovic, V., Olin, N., Rigterink, A., & Schomerus, M. (2014). Practice without evidence: Interrogating conflict resolution approaches and assumptions. Justice and Security Research Programme, International Development Department, London School of Economics.
Checkland, P. B. (1972). Towards a systems-based methodology for real-world problem solving. Journal of Systems Engineering, 3, 87–116.
Checkland, P. B. (2000). Soft systems methodology: A thirty year retrospective. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 17, S11–S58.
Checkland, P. B., & Davies, L. (1986). The use of the term ‘Weltanschauung’ in soft systems methodology. Journal of Applied Systems Analysis, 13, 109–115.
Conklin, J. (2006). Dialogue mapping: Building shared understanding of wicked problems. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
Costanza, R., & Patten, B. C. (1995). Defining and predicting sustainability. Ecological Economics, 15, 193–196.
Dekker, S. W., Hancock, P. A., & Wilkin, P. (2013). Ergonomics and sustainability: Towards an embrace of complexity and emergence. Ergonomics, 56, 357–364.
Easley, D., & Kleinberg, J. (2010). Networks, crowds, and markets: Reasoning about a highly connected world. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Edwards, C., Spence, P. R., Gentile, C. J., Edwards, A., & Edwards, A. (2013). How much Klout do you have… A test of system generated cues on source credibility. Computers in Human Behavior, 29, A12–A16.
Elkington, J. (1998). Cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st century business. Oxford, UK: Capstone.
Genaidy, A. M., Sequeira, R., Rinder, M. M., & A-Rehim, A. D. (2009). Determinants of business sustainability: An ergonomics perspective. Ergonomics, 52, 273–301.
Gunderson, L. H., & Holling, C. S. (2002). Panarchy: Understanding transformation in human and natural systems. Washington, DC: Island Press.
Haines, H., Wilson, J. R., Vink, P., & Koningsveld, A. E. (2002). Validating a framework for participatory ergonomics (the PEF). Ergonomics, 45, 309–327.
Hakansson, H., & Ford, D. (2002). How should companies interact in business networks? Journal of Business Research, 55, 133–139.
Hawkes, J. (2001). The fourth pillar of sustainability: Culture’s essential role in public planning. Melbourne, Australia: Common Ground.
Hecht, A. D., Fiksel, J., Fulton, S. C., Yosie, T. F., Hawkins, N. C., Leuenberger, H., et al. (2012). Creating the future we want. Sustainability: Science, Practice, & Policy, 8, 62–75.
Hollnagel, E. (2012). FRAM: The functional resonance analysis method: Modelling complex socio-technical systems. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
Horn, R. E., & Weber, R. P. (2007). New tools for resolving wicked problems: Mess mapping and resolution mapping processes. Watertown, MA: Strategy Kinetics LLC.
Imai, M. (1986). Kaizen – The key to Japan’s competitive success. New York: Random House.
Jackson, M. C., & Keys, P. (1984). Towards a system of systems methodologies. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 35, 473–486.
Karsh, B. T., Waterson, P., & Holden, R. J. (2014). Crossing levels in systems ergonomics: A framework to support ‘mesoergonomic’ inquiry. Applied Ergonomics, 45, 45–54.
Kodas, M. (2014). How did palm oil become such a problem – And what can we do about it? ENASIA, November 3, 2014. http://ensia.com/features/how-did-palm-oil-become-such-a-problem-and-what-can-we-do-about-it/. Accessed 13 July 2016.
Lange-Morales, K., Thatcher, A., & García-Acosta, G. (2014). Towards a sustainable world through human factors and ergonomics: It is all about values. Ergonomics, 57, 1603–1615.
Levin, K., Cashore, B., Bernstein, S., & Auld, G. (2012). Overcoming the tragedy of super wicked problems: Constraining our future selves to ameliorate global climate change. Policy Sciences, 45, 123–152.
Maier, M. W. (1998). Architecturing principles for systems of systems. Systems Engineering, 1, 267–284.
Manuaba, A. (2007). A total approach in ergonomics is a must to attain humane, competitive and sustainable work systems and products. Journal of Human Ergology, 36, 23–30.
Meadows, D. (1999). Leverage points: Places to intervene in a system. Hartland, VT: The Sustainability Institute.
Merton, R. K. (1936). The unanticipated consequences of purposive social action. American Sociological Review, 1, 894–904.
Milgram, S. (1967). The small world problem. Psychology Today, 2, 60–67.
Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., & Wood, D. J. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review, 22, 853–886.
Munasinghe, M. (2009). Sustainable development in practice: Sustainomics methodology and applications. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Murphy, R. (2012). Sustainability: A wicked problem. Sociologica, 6, 1–23.
Newman, M. E. (2003). The structure and function of complex networks. SIAM Review, 45, 167–256.
Öberg, C., Huge-Brodin, M., & Björklund, M. (2012). Applying a network level in environmental impact assessments. Journal of Business Research, 65, 247–255.
Paliwal, P. (2005). Sustainable development and systems thinking: A case study of a heritage city. The International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 12, 213–220.
Philip, S. Y., Han, J., & Faloutsos, C. (2010). Link mining: Models, algorithms, and applications. Berlin, Germany: Springer.
Richardson, M., & Ball, L. J. (2009). Internal representations, external representations and ergonomics: Towards a theoretical integration. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 10, 335–376.
Rittel, H. W., & Webber, M. M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4, 155–169.
Salmon, P. M., Walker, G. H., Read, G. J. M., Goode, N., & Stanton, N. A. (2017). Fitting methods to paradigms: Are ergonomics methods fit for systems thinking? Ergonomics, 60, 194–205.
Scerri, A., & James, P. (2010). Communities of citizens and ‘indicators’ of sustainability. Community Development Journal, 45, 219–236.
Schultz, E., & Barnett, B. (2015). Cognitive directive mapping: Designing futures that challenge anthropocentrism. Nordes, 6. http://www.nordes.org/opj/index.php/n13/article/view/398/376
Scott, J. (2012). Social network analysis. London: Sage Publications.
Snehota, I., & Hakansson, H. (Eds.). (1995). Developing relationships in business networks. London: Routledge.
Steinfeld, H., Gerber, P., Wassenaar, T., Castel, V., Rosales, M., & De Haan, C. (2006). Livestock’s long shadow. Rome: FAO.
Svedung, I., & Rasmussen, J. (2002). Graphic representation of accident scenarios: Mapping system structure and the causation of accidents. Safety Science, 40, 397–417.
Thatcher, A. (2013). Green ergonomics: Definition and scope. Ergonomics, 56, 389–398.
Thatcher, A. (2016). Longevity in a sustainable human factors and ergonomics system-of-systems. Plenary address at the 22nd Semana de Salud Ocupacional in Medellin Bogota.
Thatcher, A., & Yeow, P. H. P. (2016a). A sustainable system of systems approach: A new HFE paradigm. Ergonomics, 59, 167–178.
Thatcher, A., & Yeow, P. H. P. (2016b). Human factors for a sustainable future. Applied Ergonomics, 57, 1–7.
Walker, G. H., Gibson, H., Stanton, N. A., Baber, C., Salmon, P., & Green, D. (2006). Event analysis of systemic teamwork (EAST): A novel integration of ergonomics methods to analyse C4i activity. Ergonomics, 49, 1345–1369.
Walker, G. H., Stanton, N. A., Salmon, P. M., Jenkins, D. P., & Rafferty, L. (2010). Translating concepts of complexity to the field of ergonomics. Ergonomics, 53, 1175–1186.
Wilson, J. R. (2000). Fundamentals of ergonomics in theory and practice. Applied Ergonomics, 31, 557–567.
Wilson, J. R. (2014). Fundamentals of systems ergonomics/human factors. Applied Ergonomics, 45, 5–13.
Wisner, A. (1985). Ergonomics in industrially developing countries. Ergonomics, 28, 1213–1224.
Zhang, H., Calvo-Amodio, J., & Haapala, K. R. (2015). Establishing foundational concepts for sustainable manufacturing systems assessment through systems thinking. International Journal of Strategic Engineering Asset Management, 2, 249–269.
Zink, K. J. (2014). Designing sustainable work systems: The need for a systems approach. Applied Ergonomics, 45, 126–132.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Thatcher, A., Yeow, P.H.P. (2018). A Sustainable System-of-Systems Approach: Identifying the Important Boundaries for a Target System in Human Factors and Ergonomics. In: Thatcher, A., Yeow, P. (eds) Ergonomics and Human Factors for a Sustainable Future. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-8072-2_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-8072-2_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-8071-5
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-8072-2
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)