Skip to main content

A Level Playing Field? Complicit Meritocracy in a Post-truth Era

  • Chapter
Post-Truth, Fake News
  • 3814 Accesses

Abstract

In this chapter, we investigate two aspects of post-truth in education. The first derives from the philosophical work of Jacques Rancière, and the second derives from an analysis of meritocratic ideology in contemporary education. In both cases, we find that education has been producing a certain ‘truth’ about truth. Rancière’s work contrasts the hidden explanatory function of education, which presupposes a collective or shared sense of truth, with the arbitrariness of language as the social mechanism for understanding or determining such truth. This understanding is useful when applied to the case of meritocracy, as we discuss in the second part of this essay, as meritocratic ideology lays a framework in schools for the production of truth. Schooling bolsters, explains and emulates a meritocratic view of the world. In doing so, truth itself gets linked to meritocracy. We conclude this chapter by reflecting on an example of Donald Trump’s notion of the level playing field, briefly commenting on how the persistence and strength of meritocratic ideology in education are tied to a post-truth order.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    At the Philosophy of Education Society Annual Conference of 2017, we presented a paper on relational affect and meritocracy, which addressed the negative and positive feelings expected of (taught to?) students by educators in relation to educational achievement and mediocrity (Jackson and Bingham 2018). Some members of the audience suggested that anxiety and stress at the thought of meritocratic failure can serve as motivational to students. Emotional strain was thus articulated as a positive part of the ‘work’ of education.

References

  • Applebaum, A. (2007). Engaging student disengagement: Resistance or disagreement? In B. S. Stengel (Ed.), Philosophy of education. Urbana: Philosophy of Education Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Applebaum, A. (2015). Needing not to know: Ignorance, innocence, denials, and discourse. In E. Duarte (Ed.), Philosophy of education. Urbana: Philosophy of Education Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bingham, C., & Biesta, G. (2010). Jacques Rancière: Education, truth, emancipation. New York: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, L., & Bingham, C. (2018). Precarious meritocracy: On the affective structure of meritocracy in education. In A. Chinnery (Ed.), Philosophy of education 2017. Urbana: Philosophy of Education Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kozol, J. (2012). Savage inequalities. New York: Broadway Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNamee, S., & Miller, R. (2004). The meritocracy myth. Sociation Today, 2(1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, M. A. (2015). Western models of intercultural philosophy. In T. Besley & M. A. Peters (Eds.), Interculturalism, education and dialogue. New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, M. A. (2017). Education in a post-truth world. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 49(6), 563–566.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rancière, J. (1991). The ignorant schoolmaster: Five lessons in intellectual emancipation. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rancière, J. (1995). On the shores of politics. London/New York: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rancière, J. (1999). Disagreement: Politics and philosophy. Minneapolis/London: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rancière, J. (2004). The politics of aesthetics. London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinberg, S., & Kincheloe, J. (2009). Smoke and mirrors: More than one way to be diverse and multicultural. In S. Steinberg (Ed.), Diversity and multiculturalism: A reader. New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trump, D. J. (2017, June 7). Statement by President Trump on the Paris Climate Accord. The White House. https://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2017/06/01/statement-president-trump-paris-climate-accord. Accessed June 7, 2017.

  • Warren, J., & Hytten, K. (2004). The faces of whiteness: Pitfalls and the critical democrat. Communication, 53(4), 321–339.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Liz Jackson .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Jackson, L., Bingham, C. (2018). A Level Playing Field? Complicit Meritocracy in a Post-truth Era. In: Peters, M.A., Rider, S., Hyvönen, M., Besley, T. (eds) Post-Truth, Fake News. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-8013-5_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-8013-5_13

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-8012-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-8013-5

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics