Skip to main content

Reading Shaftesbury

Performing as a Critic

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Performing Political Theory
  • 279 Accesses

Abstract

The second lesson comes from Lord Shaftesbury who was tutored by the great theorist John Locke. Shaftesbury developed concepts of criticism and performance as a new way of building bridges between great writers and new readers. Shaftesbury models the way every contemporary academic should perform by teaching the arts of criticism for student-readers to use when engaging with the texts of great writers of political theory.

The original version of this chapter was revised: Belated author correction has been corrected. The erratum to this chapter is available at https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-7998-6_8

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aronson, Jason. 1959. Critical Note: Shaftesbury on Locke. American Political Science Review 53 (4): 1101–1104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brett, R.L. 1951. The Third Earl of Shaftesbury. London: Hutchinson’s University Library.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carey, Daniel. 2006. Locke, Shaftesbury and Hutcheson: Contesting Diversity in the Enlightenment and Beyond. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cassirer, Ernst. 1953. The Platonic Renaissance in England, trans. James P. Pettegrove. London: Nelson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Critchley, Simon. 2002. On Humour. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danford, John W. 1990. David Hume and the Problem of Reason. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ginsberg, Robert (ed.). 1987. The Philosopher as Writer. London: Associated University Presses.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grean, Stanley. 1967. Shaftesbury’s Philosophy of Religion and Ethics. Athens: Ohio University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, Susan. 1990. Shaftesbury’s Soliloquy: The Development of Rhetorical Authority. Rhetoric Review 9 (1): 94–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaffro, Laurent. 2008. Which Platonism for Which Modernity? Chap. 17. In Platonism at the Origins of Modernity, ed. Douglas Hedley and Sarah Hutton, 255–267. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaffro, Laurent. 2014. Cyrus’ Strategy: Shaftesbury on Human Frailty and the Will. In New Ages, New Opinions: Shaftesbury in His World and Today, ed. Patrick Mueller, 153–165. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, Lawrence E. 1994. Shaftesbury and the Culture of Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Klein, Lawrence E. 1999. ‘Introduction’ to Shaftesbury’s Characteristics, vii–xxxi. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lang, Berel. 1980a. Towards a Poetics of Philosophical Discourse. The Monist 63 (4): 445–464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lang, Berel. 1980b. Philosophical Style. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lang, Berel. 1990. The Anatomy of Philosophical Style. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mansfield, Harvey J., Jr. 1965. Statesmanship and Party Government. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Markley, Robert. 1987. Style as Philosophical Structure. In The Philosopher as Writer, ed. Robert Ginsberg, 140–154. London: Associated University Presses.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melzer, Arthur M. 2014. Philosophy Between the Lines. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pangle, Thomas L. 1973. Montesquieu’s Philosophy of Liberalism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richetti, John T. 1983. Philosophical Writing: Locke, Berkeley, Hume. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, Alan. 2012. On Politics. London: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryle, Gilbert. 1971. Jane Austen and the Moralists, Chap. 8. In English Literature and British Philosophy, ed. S.P. Rosenbaum, 168–183. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaftesbury, Lord. 1716. Several Letters Written by a Noble Lord to a Young Man at the University. London: J. Roberts, available as a e-book through the British Library.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaftesbury, Lord. 1999. Soliloquy. In Characteristics, ed. L.E. Klein, 70–162. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, Charles. 1992. Sources of the Self. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tierney-Hynes, Rebecca. 2005. Shaftesbury’s Soliloquy: Authorship and the Psychology of Romance. Eighteenth Century Studies 38 (4): 605–621.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Voitle, Robert. 1984. The Third Earl of Shaftesbury. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John Uhr .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Uhr, J. (2018). Reading Shaftesbury. In: Performing Political Theory . Palgrave Pivot, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-7998-6_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics