Skip to main content

Embedding MOOCs in Academic Programmes as a Part of Curriculum Transformation: A Pilot Case Study

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Innovations in Open and Flexible Education

Part of the book series: Education Innovation Series ((EDIN))

Abstract

The University of Wollongong’s first locally developed and hosted massive open online course (MOOC) The Reluctant Mathematician was a highly scaffolded MOOC designed to support stressed and low-efficacy mathematics learners. It was developed to raise maths skills at our university and also in the community – where such skills continue to be a challenge and in some cases a source of stress. Internally, the MOOC provided an alternative online way to support students who struggle with mathematics at university level and as a complement to the existing face-to-face services. This paper describes a successful approach to using MOOCs not only for addressing skills shortage among university students but also to engage staff in the hybrid learning aspects of curriculum transformation. Based on a small-scale pilot, this paper describes the narrative of engagement of academics and highlights the main elements which were conducive to their involvement in selecting and using the MOOC as support for an assignment in their curriculum. A framework is proposed for educators who are interested in using MOOCs for a similar purpose.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Campbell, A. (2013). What threats and benefits do free online mathematics courses pose to traditional universities? Paper presented at the proceedings of the 19th annual congress of the Association for Mathematics Education of South Africa. Cape Town.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conole, G. (2007). An international comparison of the relationship between policy and practice in e-learning. In Handbook of e-learning research (pp. 286–310). London: Sage Publications.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Delbanco, A. (2013). MOOCs of hazard: Will online education dampen the college experience? Yes: Will it be worth it? Well. Retrieved from https://newrepublic.com/article/112731/moocs-will-online-education-ruin-university-experience05/05/2015

  • Greenagel, F. L. (2002). The illusion of e-learning: Why we are missing out on the promise of technology. League White Papers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoban, G., Nielsen, W., & Carceller, C. (2010). Articulating constructionism: Learning science through designing and making ‘Slowmations’ (Student-generated animations). In C. H. Steel, M. J. Keppell, P. Gerbic, & S. Housego (Eds.), Curriculum, technology & transformation for an unknown future (pp. 433–443). Brisbane, Australia: University of Queensland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huber, M. T., & Hutchings, P. (2004). Integrative learning: Mapping the terrain. The academy in transition. Washington, DC: Association of American Colleges and Universities.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuh, G. D. (2008). Excerpt from high-impact educational practices: What they are, who has access to them, and why they matter. Washington, DC: Association of American Colleges and Universities.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambert, S. (2015). Reluctant mathematician: Skills-based MOOC scaffolds wide range of learners. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 1, 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • N. L. (2013). The Economist explains: Will MOOCs kill university degrees?. Retrieved from http://www.economist.com/blogs/economist-explains/2013/10/economist-explains

  • Pappano, L. (2012). The year of the MOOC. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2012/11/04/education/edlife/massive-open-online-courses-are-multiplying-at-a-rapid-pace.html?_r=0

  • Professions Australia. (2008). Higher education policy: Delivering Australia’s future professional workforce requirements. Professions Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valentin, M. A., Nafukho, F., Valentin Jr, C., Johnson, D. D., & LeCount, J. (2014). Return on investment: Contrary to popular belief, MOOC’s are not free. Paper presented at the 14th international conference on HRD theory and practice across Europe. Manchester, UK.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sarah Lambert .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Lambert, S., Alony, I. (2018). Embedding MOOCs in Academic Programmes as a Part of Curriculum Transformation: A Pilot Case Study. In: Li, K., Yuen, K., Wong, B. (eds) Innovations in Open and Flexible Education. Education Innovation Series. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-7995-5_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-7995-5_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-7994-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-7995-5

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics